Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

KEITH M

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    1,361

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by KEITH M

  2. Posted

    10 minutes ago, soupy said:

    Yep that big word if again lol Yep hindsight is wonderful thing but thought bomber would of got 3 points where wells did not but nothing is guaranteed in speedway.

    But in hindsight they got it right as heats 11 and 12 were 9-3 in favour of Berwick whilst a 3-3 which you were hoping for in heat 11,would of only made it 8-4 to Berwick even with a 5-1 tac sub success if they had of used Bomber in heat 12 

  5. Posted · Edited by KEITH M

    50 minutes ago, Falcon1983 said:

    Then you have an "allowance" of time for on track injuries which is incorporated into the overall running time to complete a meeting.

     

    So would we have to have a new set of rules in the rule book 

    serious injury = unlimited time. Doctor looking at rider = 30 mins. Riders shaken = 10 minutes. Spectator in crowd falling ill = 40 minutes. AirFence deflation = 30 minutes. Innocent riders machinery repairs= 10 minutes.

    The list could go on as how many meetings run over 2 hours if there is not an unforeseen incident 

     

    • Like 1

  10. Posted

    6 hours ago, screm said:
    Newcastle Speedway are pleased to announce, that from this week, all children under the age of 16 will be able to enter FREE of charge (with a paying adult)!
     

    So does this mean a headmaster could take his full school ? Is 300 kids running around for an extra £18  going to be worth it 

    Obviously I am joking but can you imagine Rob Grants face  if someone did do that ?

    • Haha 1

  11. Posted · Edited by KEITH M

    This is a quote today from one Diamonds fan who has been going to nearly every home meeting since 1975 from the age of 11 ….. I am not going today to watch that sh*te, I am staying in to watch Liverpool v Everton …….. Wonder how many other fans were saying the same thing ? 

  15. Posted

    I have been going to Brough for 43 years now and for 40 of them years I used to pay my entrance money to watch the Owens, Hunter, Bargh, Pedersen( Nicki and Bjarne)Stuart Robson   Larson, Bach and Lambert etc Now when I pay my entrance money I say I am going to watch Cook, Masters, Pickering, Nicholls, Charles Wright, Kerr and the Worralls etc …. Notice the common theme ? I used to go to be excited by my teams riders now I look forward to seeing the opposition teams riders 

    • Like 3

  22. Posted

    15 minutes ago, szkocjasid said:

    I don't think that would've been the case, it was well documented that there was a lack of riders due to Covid / Brexit / Polish rules. 

    The main difference was the RS rule gave Danyon Hume a Champ spot (deservedly) & allowed for stronger guests at reserve (e.g Leon Flint replacing weaker riders)!

    What is defined as a rising star .. You are always going to get problems… if the rule had of been around in the 70’s and 80’s Kenny Carter would of been a rising star, Michael Lee would of been a rising star, Gary Havelock would of been a rising star the list could go on, so there will always be riders at reserve who are better than others at a young age which would sh@ft the ruling to keep reserves equal 

    • Like 1

  23. Posted

    1 hour ago, MrP said:

    My mate’s Sisters Brother-in-Law has been told off someone who bought a Chronicle from someone selling them in the city centre that her uncle’s cousin reckons we’re in Talks with Laguta who they reckon comes in on a 3 point average because he once watched Neighbours and has a Kylie poster on his wall. Keep it to yourself 

    Now I know your making things up…………….

     

    They have never had blokes selling the Chronicle for years in town 

    • Haha 3
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy

  I accept