Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

SPEEDY69

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2,364

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SPEEDY69

  2. Posted · Edited by SPEEDY69

    Is there anything fans here won't whine about :D

    I enjoyed the meet and it was wonderful to see our riders come out on top.

    Of course GB won't win the WC but as long as they give a good account then that is progress.

    Moaning about the fact we only beat weakened teams is pointless.

    GB were weakened by the loss of Loram and Louis in previous years but had to just get on with it. That's speedway.

    Credit where its due and our lads did marvellous.

    I thought the Aussies would pip us and those last 5 heats would go their way.

    Glad to see I was wrong and our lads fought for every point.

    Tai beating Holder was class and had to laugh at his comment that he could see what Chris was doing by watching the helmet cam on the big screen. Good one son!

    Lee got a great win and Steady was exactly that.

    Bomber and Scotty were top class and inspired the rest.

    Getting to the final is an acheivment for GB and one hopefully they can build on.

    It might help inspire some of the younger lads to want to be part of that.

    Our boys never seem to get the money from sponsors they deserve and have the handicap of usually being outclassed equipment wise but last night was their night and they deserved their glory.

    Putting them down especially when those doing it are British is silly.

    Last year the Russians deservedly got tons of praise for thier qualifying feats and what GB did last night was no different to that.

    We are hardly a top speedway nation anymore.

    Give cerdit where it's due and deserved.

    We did well last night.

    :)

     

    Couldn't agree more. Well done to the Brits, an excellent result and best of luck for Saturday. I hope that Stead improves his gating as it will be vital at Vojens. Couldn't believe Lindgren trying to get reinstated for Heat 1 - clearly minimal contact if any at all and nothing to make a rider fall off. I don't think the Aussies were being arrogant, simply trying to keep relaxed and not let the pressure get to them. Wonder if Lyon will keep the same riding order putting out Scott in the first & last heats - I think it should be the job of the Captain to shoulder that pressure to bring it home.

  3. Posted

    Fair enough, but Sir Stirling Moss was never a world champion while other lesser drivers have been. And in terms of speedway the dynamics have changed with the advent of the GPs. No one can know whether Gollob would've emulated Szczakiel under the old system? One night in Poland worked for Jerzy, why not for Gollob? He's won GPs at Wroclaw, Bydgoszcz and Torun. The world championship is important, of course, but to my mind so are GP wins. Winning a GP certainly counts for more than winning the Intercontinental Final.

    I agree that with a World Final in Poland Gollob would likely have won one by now. Disagree though about the Intercontinental Final/GP - certainly more pressure in the Inter as you had to finish in the top positions to get to the World Final - no slip ups were possible. One or two poor GPs and you can still be World Champ.

  4. Posted

    Poland's only world champion, to date, although that looks like changing this year. Big question is Gollob or Hampel? You really have to give Gollob a lot of credit. It isn't so long ago that he was being written off in some quarters. Yet in the last three seasons he has enjoyed a remarkable renaissance, winning in the most unexpected of places, such as Malilla, Copenhagen and Terenzano. He even made a decent fist of Cardiff this season. Gollob has also won something like eighteen GPs, while Britain has managed a combined total of four (to put this abject performance into its proper context, Tony Rickardsson once won six in a season).

    I accept that to win any open meeting is an achievement in itself but I find GP wins irrelevant - it's the title of World Champion they are going for.

  5. Posted

    They kept asking Nicholls back and Harris completed last season fourteenth out of fifteen, showing very little, other than a last race win in Bydgoszcz (having finished stone last in his other four) yet he was asked back. Hancock also keeps the stars and stripes flying in the GPs. I think they might be loathe to lose their American presence. BSI's parent company is, after all, the American IMG.

    I think Harris was on his last chance this year (as he has never qualified for the series, which at least Nicholls did twice I think) but winning the British Championship may save him again if he fails to get through the qualifiers. It's all about becoming world champion and there are plenty in there who have had so many chances - if Gollob doesn't win this year with three GPs in Poland then he never will either. Don't forget Poland's last world champion was in the early 1970s so Britian hasn't done that bad!

  7. Posted

    As some of the nominations for the GP in the past seem to have been based on National Champions, this includes Britain, then it seems certain that Harris will be in the GP again next season even if he fails to qualify again - perhaps I'm wrong but I don't think he's ever qualified has he?

     

    Good for him to win last night, he made a great start in the final and has been on top form in the last couple of weeks. Does anyone know if the ref was watching the meeting at any stage?!!

  8. Posted

    I've been going to Foxhall most weeks since about 1982 and in my view any lack of passing is not solely due to the track shape. I have witnessed processional meetings at every track I've been to, even at GP level they have been dull this year by and large. As the bikes continue to output more power and the changes in style required it's easier than ever for a rider to stay in front, especially on the almost universal slick tracks. Let me tell you there are riders who can pass regularly at Foxhall, Nicholls & Harris being two, but I don't think there is as much skill required with the throttle these days as in the past.

    At many tracks you can simply hold it on full most of the time. What's needed is a reduction in power/revs for the bikes and heavier tracks where you simply can't keep full throttle all the way around. When faced with tracks which are like this many of todays riders struggle badly. 15 years ago you would rarely see riders go right round the fence line because the risk of a crash/lift/losing ground due to a mistake was high. That isn't the case any more so there is no fear and what used to separate those who could use that bit of the outside line and engineer a pass has now disappeared.

  10. Posted

    The main criteria for the nomination should be whether they can make consistently good starts. As has been evidenced this year overtaking has been rare with most races processional. With the possibility of 3 GPs in Poland next year the organisers are clearly desperate for a Polish World Champion (and the gate receipts!), which despite all the plaudits on their strengths, they have failed to deliver since the early 1970s.

  11. Posted · Edited by SPEEDY69

    Yes, I realised that, but not one with a chance of winning the Grand Prix. What I'm getting at is that I don't think that not having a full GP British rider at Cardiff would make any difference to the gate. I don't think not having a British rider would make any real difference to the interest in the Grand Prix series as a whole. After all, it's not as though British riders have any chance of winning the GP at the moment. Does anyone here watch the Grand Prix on television or go to see them live just because Scott Nicholls and Chris Harris are in them?

    Actually, yes. I went to Latvia this year but wouldn't have if there were no brits to support. The event loses appeal for me. Also, a lot of people are puitting Woffinden forward but isn't he a reserve in the foreign leagues?

  12. Posted

    I also think there are too many who get in without doing qualifying rounds as such - and I don't mean wilcards, but the riders who finish in the top 8. I think it should be the top three only. There are riders who perform very well in 1 or 2 GPs but poorly in the others but continue to get in top 8. There is too little change from one year to the next and on the current state of motorway tracks & dull racing then the only real points of interest are how the newcomers get on. If this doesn't change I think the series will continue to decline - something I won't be too disappointed about anyway as I've always much preferred team racing.

  13. Posted

    no need to build for the future in a few years time because by then some new youngsters will replace this bunch and so it goes on - seen it happen in other sports. i think we might surprise a few at peterborough but whatever the ages of any rider, the team should be your strongest one and i don't think it is.

  14. Posted

    Rubbish,(to Gemmilou) riders need to earn their places in the team and just because they are young doesn't mean they should be given a chance. I am all for bringing in the youngsters, but surely you put your best team out for the WTC.

     

    If Lyon wants to blood youngsters, get some internationals organised.

    Wow, this must be the first post of yours I completely agree with!! We see it other sports as well, I remeber Cricket went down that road for a long time, putting in players just because they are young. Football the same but that's changed recently and who did most people say was one of the better performers for England - Beckham one of the oldest.

     

    You need the best team regardless of age.

     

  15. Posted

    It's no good arguing with you because I agree with what you say. :P

    It was Orion saying it wasn't about money when of course the decision he made had a lot to do with money, otherwise Scott would have ridden in the E.L. and given up riding abroad if he was that cheesed off going from one airport terminal to another.

    Disagree Gemini. I have seen some of Scott's comments on missing the EL and it was to do with a reduced racing schedule, travelling time and time with his family. Poland meetings are on Sundays, Sweden on Tuesdays which makes it fairly easily to plan homelife around. In the EL, you can be called upon to ride on any day of the week, sometmes at short notice due to rain offs and it's this that led to him giving the EL a miss for a year - nothing to do with money.

  17. Posted

    Hi

     

    Does anyone know if there is any way to buy tickets for Latvia from the UK other than via a bank transfer (£20 charge!)?

     

    If not, are tickest easily available at the track on the day or is this one usually sold out?

     

    I have flights and accommodation booked already but any help with this GP would be much appreciated.

     

    Thanks

     

    Karl

  18. Posted

    I am a big fan of Scott and of course would love to see him in the GPs again next year - he is certainly one of the more entertaining riders in the series. He has no right to be there next year though as he finished outside the top 8 and didn't do the qualifiers so if they picked others he would gave to accept it, as his fans would. However, the series has nevre been about who are the best current riders in the world - it's a series to attract sponsors, fans & viewers & ultimately make money.

     

    The qualifiers for this years series didn't really pull up any trees did they and all three are now out again. Holder failed to get through the qualifiers so if he gets a wildcard, why would anyone else bother doing them? It's not black and white this issue but yes I still think Scott adds to the series and I can't think of many others better who should replace him.

  20. Posted

    holder has to be in gps as i said on another thread he would be in top 8 easily maybe even top 5 hes that good

     

    Trouble is, Holder was not good enough to get through the GP qualifying and was knocked out earlier this year. By all means nominate him but as for every nominated rider, there are others who have just missed qualification that could rightly feel aggrieved.

     

    Having said that, the qualifiers through the rounds for this years GP haven't really set it alight either - Dryml, Kasprzak, Pedersen?

  21. Posted

    I think Scott must have some guy who used to have some input into the tuning of the Reliant Robin.

    As far as I'm concerned there is nothing wrong with the tuning side of Scott's equipment, he alwasy has more than enough power, it's the setting up of the bike on GP race nights that seems to be the problem - normally takes at least 2 races to get it anywhere near right. Power does not equal speed and in slick conditions it is the steps the mechanics take to reduce the power of the engine & adjust other parts of the bike that can be the differnece between winning and losing. This is probably why he has taken the step (if true) of refreshing his support team - to be honest I think he was always more competitive when his father looked after his bikes on race day.

     

  22. Posted

    How we can improve is if the riders/mechanics etc. can get their machinery suited to the conditions - it was quite obvious on Monday that they were lacking in speed and simply spinning their back wheels in the slick conditions - Bjarne Pedersen simply had so much drive along the straights and many of the other riders and their teams managed to get this right. This area has dogged our lads so often now that it must be very frustrating for them as well - on the TV they did show Scott talikng to Armando Castagna, perhaps he was pointing this out to him :approve:

     

    Apart from that I'd like to hear the team manager show some belief and inspire the team to do well & not say that his focus is on next year.

  24. Posted

    I have been to every Cardiff GP but had to miss this years so watched on telly but I thoughtit was really entertaining stuff. It wasn't all about the starts or who had the fastest machine and those riders who have the skill to cope with a rutted track shone through. Certainly much better than the slick bore fests we usually see on GP nights. Only thing that spoiled it was the ref.

  25. Posted

    The referee was the villain of the piece last night, not Nicki Pedersen. IMHO he relishes in the "bad boy" image and good luck to him, it's not his fault that the officials were completely inept.

     

    Love him or hate him, he's still the best speedway rider in the world (well, since rabbit hung up her kevlars anyway). B)

     

    Haven'y the time to read throught the whole thread so not sure if anyone has already said this. I agree that it's the referee who decides upon exclusions but I do believe that NP knew full well that he was beaten to the first turn both by Adams and Bjarne and simply carried on coming across expecting contact, which there was, and falling fairly comfortably expecting a re-run. Although he probably expected an all four back decision I think he still deliberately initiated the contact to get a re-run and that is cheating in my book. However, he made the final and didn't lose as many points on JC as he might have so did the ends justify the means - quite possibly in NPs head but he is playing with fire here and could get seriously injured - even in a simple enough looking bail out.

     

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy

  I accept