Ron 27 Posted October 17, 2010 I just try to read ColinCooke's posts - puts me to sleep every time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Jasper 192 Posted October 17, 2010 Then I hope we won't hear any bleating from you next year when Coventry start the season 2.18 points better off than the rest of us. As long as its within the rules Steve, just like it was within the rules that Madsen was a 4, just like it was within the rules that Doyle got a reduction, just like Darcy came in on a 4... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orion 7,615 Posted October 17, 2010 Then I hope we won't hear any bleating from you next year when Coventry start the season 2.18 points better off than the rest of us. Why will they start 2.18 points better of than anyone else ? Paw licker under the rules will be a 4 pointer glug glug glug Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Druid 18 Posted October 17, 2010 (edited) Zzzzzzz! wake me up at the start of next season. 2010 is done and dusted get over it move on. Edited October 17, 2010 by Prawn Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedibee 3,091 Posted October 17, 2010 Zzzzzzz! wake me up at the start of next season. 2010 is done and dusted get over it move on. And me . After all come march 2010 who will remember who won the playoffs anyway? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,821 Posted October 17, 2010 The season is now at a close Coventry Bees champions fair an squareI know it is a bit hard for some to chew on but its done dusted so roll on next season. Well said that poster! Nah. Orion, Steve Brum and the rest of them will be more than happy to see a rider on a 6.18 average starting for Coventry at reserve on 4 points. They have said for the last week or three that it is fair and OK for Pawlicki to have ridden only 11 meetings so they will have no cause to complain when Coventry have an instant 2.18 point team building advantage over the rest of the EL teams. That will teach you for selective reading Steve. I said QUITE CLEARLY that i DONT think its fair that Pawlicki didnt ride enough matches to get a true average. But Coventry didnt break any rules. You were happy to take Watt on his `false` average after dropping it at Eastbourne last season. Seems its only ok if its in Poole`s favour, eh Steve? So before you misquote me in future, be sure you`ve read ALL the post and posts. Unless you want to look like an idiot (although you are doing a grand job of that with this ridiculous thread that only one Poole posters seems to believe in. If you had a good point you might just have some backing! ) then carry on. Still going Steve...ha ha haha Watch you don't give yourself an ulcer! ive only been away 2 days and i cant believe he is still bleating this same nonesense!!! Zzzzzzz! wake me up at the start of next season. 2010 is done and dusted get over it move on. unfortunately for all Poole fans only 1 wont have moved on by then!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 17, 2010 I said QUITE CLEARLY that i DONT think its fair that Pawlicki didnt ride enough matches to get a true average. But Coventry didnt break any rules. You were happy to take Watt on his `false` average after dropping it at Eastbourne last season. Seems its only ok if its in Poole`s favour, eh Steve? So before you misquote me in future, be sure you`ve read ALL the post and posts. Watt has put on just over half a point on his starting average. ON a track he rates as his best. You believed all this Watt trying to rduce his average in the winter, when in truth it was the usual nonesense sprouted by the usual susppects. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,821 Posted October 17, 2010 Watt has put on just over half a point on his starting average. ON a track he rates as his best. You believed all this Watt trying to rduce his average in the winter, when in truth it was the usual nonesense sprouted by the usual susppects. Steve, the point is you GAINED from his starting average! like ALL of the starting averages on Pooles side. As virtually every BSF user predicted. We ALL know that riders are dictacted by there averages - who knows if its nonesense or not - or if there is an element of truth in it. Either way its taking advantage of riders on starting averages - just the same thing that Cov did having Pawlicki in reserve. Whether its right or not that he will come back on a 4 is open for discussion. But lets kid no one, Cov played it the same way that any other club would do in there position - Poole included! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
T.N.T. 355 Posted October 17, 2010 But lets kid no one, Cov played it the same way that any other club would do in there position - Poole included! MOST tracks would have done .... Not All !!! All this reminds me so much of a certain Mr Lindback's start over here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 17, 2010 MOST tracks would have done .... Not All !!! All this reminds me so much of a certain Mr Lindback's start over here Lindback came in on a 4, which was correct. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve0 5,517 Posted October 17, 2010 ARRRGGHHH!! Can we rename this thread "SS - stubborn in the extreme?" I can't believe this thread is still going either Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,821 Posted October 17, 2010 ARRRGGHHH!! Can we rename this thread "SS - stubborn in the extreme?" I can't believe this thread is still going either its a 1 man crusade it seems Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sprog1 79 Posted October 17, 2010 its a 1 man crusade it seems Yep. Don Quixote is alive and well in Dorset. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phlipphlopp 3,913 Posted October 17, 2010 its a 1 man crusade it seems I dont know why you all keep biting.............He's done some good fishing here , as the amount of pages testify Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
190557 17 Posted October 17, 2010 Looks like Pawlicki lost a run off for first place against Protasiewicz in an individual meeting in Poland this afternoon. He was up against a quality field and should be very useful for Coventry next year starting on a 4 point average. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites