barrow boy 119 Posted September 19, 2014 My top 10 riders on current form are now as follows:- 01-Maciek Janowski-Poole-1190 02-Jason Doyle-Leicester-1180 03-Matej Zagar-Belle Vue-1110 04-Troy Batchelor-Swindon-1105 05-Kenneth Bjerre-King's Lynn-1090 06-Hans Andersen-Coventry-1080 07-Chris Harris-Coventry-1070 08-Scott Nicholls-Belle Vue-1050 09-Craig Cook-Belle Vue-970 10-Peter Kildemand-Swindon-930 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Beevers 207 Posted September 19, 2014 My top 10 riders on current form are now as follows:-01-Maciek Janowski-Poole-119002-Jason Doyle-Leicester-118003-Matej Zagar-Belle Vue-111004-Troy Batchelor-Swindon-110505-Kenneth Bjerre-King's Lynn-109006-Hans Andersen-Coventry-108007-Chris Harris-Coventry-107008-Scott Nicholls-Belle Vue-105009-Craig Cook-Belle Vue-97010-Peter Kildemand-Swindon-930 What is the meaning of the four numbers after a riders name. Some kind of average? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
van wolfswinkel 635 Posted September 21, 2014 (edited) Is this EL form only? How many matches is current form? Would have thought on current form(last 6 EL matches)Morra, North, Newman would be in top 10? Schlein ahead of Killer recently. Edited September 21, 2014 by keef van cross Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barrow boy 119 Posted November 1, 2014 Is this EL form only? How many matches is current form? Would have thought on current form(last 6 EL matches)Morra, North, Newman would be in top 10? Schlein ahead of Killer recently. Most current last 10 all meaningful matches including guest appearances but for my final chart of the season I offer you my top 20 including riders who ended the season on the injured list but not including riders who left the league before it's end. 01-Maciek Janowski-Poole-1200 02-Jason Doyle-Leicester-1180 03-Neils Kristian Iversen-King's Lynn-1140 04-Kenneth Bjerre-King's Lynn-1080 05-Tai Woffinden-Wolverhampton-1075 06-Hans Andersen-Coventry-1070 07-Scott Nicholls-Belle Vue-1050 08-Matej Zagar-Belle Vue-1040 09-Cheis Harris-Coventry-1010 10-Trot Batchelor-Swindin-1005 11-Craig Cook-Belle Vue-950 12-Peter Kildemand-Swindon-920 13-Rory Schlein-King's Lynn-860 14-Cameron Woodward-Eastbourne-800 15-Lewis Bridger-Lakeside-795 16-Przemyslaw Pawlicki-Poole-790 17-Ben Barker-Coventry-780* 18-Bjarne Pedersen-Eastbourne-775 19-Davey Watt-Lakeside-770 20-Simon Stead-Leicester-760 * Ben Barker ended the season with Coventry but his ranking points were earned with Birmingham. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
strife 153 Posted November 2, 2014 Newman If you follow Barrow Boy's posts, you'll know that he has a system based on difficulty of rides, so riders at 1, 3 & 5 have a greater degree of difficulty than those at 4 & 5, and 6 & 7. By publishing his own scores, it at least shows the relevant effectiveness of riders - it looks like Janowski was regularly defeating the opposition's top three. Riders such as Newman and Kerr frequently rattled-up high scores, but rarely met opposition heat leaders. Indeed, a reserve could score nine points just by defeating the opposition reserves in 5 rides ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barrow boy 119 Posted November 3, 2014 If you follow Barrow Boy's posts, you'll know that he has a system based on difficulty of rides, so riders at 1, 3 & 5 have a greater degree of difficulty than those at 4 & 5, and 6 & 7. By publishing his own scores, it at least shows the relevant effectiveness of riders - it looks like Janowski was regularly defeating the opposition's top three. Riders such as Newman and Kerr frequently rattled-up high scores, but rarely met opposition heat leaders. Indeed, a reserve could score nine points just by defeating the opposition reserves in 5 rides ... Exactly 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
superguest 194 Posted November 3, 2014 (edited) If you follow Barrow Boy's posts, you'll know that he has a system based on difficulty of rides, so riders at 1, 3 & 5 have a greater degree of difficulty than those at 4 & 5, and 6 & 7. By publishing his own scores, it at least shows the relevant effectiveness of riders - it looks like Janowski was regularly defeating the opposition's top three. Riders such as Newman and Kerr frequently rattled-up high scores, but rarely met opposition heat leaders. Indeed, a reserve could score nine points just by defeating the opposition reserves in 5 rides ... Imo this is what we need to use to determin averages next season. Any chance an El promoter sees this? Edited November 3, 2014 by superguest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pugwash 3,208 Posted November 3, 2014 If you follow Barrow Boy's posts, you'll know that he has a system based on difficulty of rides, so riders at 1, 3 & 5 have a greater degree of difficulty than those at 4 & 5, and 6 & 7. By publishing his own scores, it at least shows the relevant effectiveness of riders - it looks like Janowski was regularly defeating the opposition's top three. Riders such as Newman and Kerr frequently rattled-up high scores, but rarely met opposition heat leaders. Indeed, a reserve could score nine points just by defeating the opposition reserves in 5 rides ... Good work it is too, thanks for all your hard work Barrow Boy. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
