Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
PhilTheAce

Leicester lions 2023 (PREMIERSHIP)

Recommended Posts

Just now, scoobydoo said:

You have to wonder if Worrall was fortunate he didnt get tested last night at Wolverhampton 

Or at the Pairs, or the British Final... or when he went to Venice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 40-38 said:

He can ride for us with a false beard and ‘tache and be billed as the experienced Pole Krzysztof Harriszek. In heats where he meets himself it would be explosive.

Artem Laguta wouldn't be very happy with a double threat to his left ankle though

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe this why Richie was too heavy to win the British final,  hes be carrying a six pack in his kevelars.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DiveBomb said:

Maybe this why Richie was too heavy to win the British final,  hes be carrying a six pack in his kevelars.

It’s all those snacks he puts away when he gets the munchies. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, False dawn said:

He refused a test in 2018 and was given a 2 year ban as a result. Retired and then came back this year.

Learnt his lesson then if hes failed one again 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 40-38 said:

It’s all those snacks he puts away when he gets the munchies. 

Nick Morris still sends over some kangaroo burgers for him before a meeting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, 2ndbendbeerhut said:

Unfortunately, one rider from each team produced a non-negative result on their test, and they were therefore excluded from the event.

Neither Worrall or Boxall are riding.

Probably important to note that a non-negative isn't a positive. It needs to be confirmed by the lab.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do we know how often these tests provide false positive results? I noticed that it’s reported as non-negative, is that because they need official lab testing in the same way drug and alcohol testing is done by the police?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 40-38 said:

Do we know how often these tests provide false positive results? I noticed that it’s reported as non-negative, is that because they need official lab testing in the same way drug and alcohol testing is done by the police?

Happens frequently at my work..they have a drug test are some are non conclusive. They are sent to a lab for a further inspection and usually solves the puzzle. I bet they find white lightning and frosty Jack's in his system ..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RBThirdbend said:

Probably important to note that a non-negative isn't a positive. It needs to be confirmed by the lab.

 

2 minutes ago, 40-38 said:

Do we know how often these tests provide false positive results? I noticed that it’s reported as non-negative, is that because they need official lab testing in the same way drug and alcohol testing is done by the police?

I cant recall any such situation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 40-38 said:

Do we know how often these tests provide false positive results? I noticed that it’s reported as non-negative, is that because they need official lab testing in the same way drug and alcohol testing is done by the police?

No, the B sample is lab analysed as it's more accurate.

Not 100% sure what the speedway process is but there may also be a review of the lab results by a specialist to see if they are consistent with medications the subject declared

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

 

I cant recall any such situation

You’d think that two dodgy kits would be coincidental as well. One maybe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 40-38 said:

You’d think that two dodgy kits would be coincidental as well. One maybe.

It's not dodgy kits. They might pick up painkillers for example as opiates.

It does happen but not often.

There have been cases where riders don't get a ban because of meds. Didn't that happen to Kyle Howarth with co codamol?

Edited by RBThirdbend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RBThirdbend said:

It's not dodgy kits. They might pick up painkillers for example as opiates.

It does happen but not often.

There have been cases where riders don't get a ban because of meds. Didn't that happen to Kyle Howarth with co codamol?

But given the Barker situation last year and the Morris one this year surely you’d be extra careful. It’s not worth the risk is it? I’m sure many riders take painkillers, but is it possible that lots of them might fail a test? Is it a failing in the SCB process? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy