No, i want a rule that makes it fairer across the board for all teams, instead of a lopsided league (again). Another team wouldnt have met the wage demands so saying another team could have signed them is totally facetious

So you want a rule just to stop Poole winning! The riders wanted to come to Poole and the fans are grateful that we can see two up and coming stars every week. Another team could have signed them but they didn't. 

To be fair, I think maybe it’s you that are missing the point. Poole are successful as a business and as a team. They have  a strong supporter base who have been treated to a winning team year after year. They are addicted to winning because they have got used to it. But the team can only beat what’s in front of them, and last night, the opposition were not only poor but disappointing - 5 race wins out of 13. And three of these were by Harris. After last year’s clashes, much was expected of this match but Glasgow were a let down.  But that’s only half the story - not only do Poole keep their own supporters happy, but the also make other promoters happy when Poole come to visit. Because the home supporters turn out in greater numbers because they want to see the mighty Pirates humiliated by their team. And sometimes that happens. For example, if you were an Edinburgh supporter, would you prefer to watch the Monarchs against Poole or against, say, Scunthorpe?

Going for a narrow 47-43 win for the Witches, think the Foxes will put up a good fight at Foxhall  Looking forward to after the meeting watching some laps being spun by some young guns

It wasn’t even a “you’ve still ridden well” 0 either… he was miles off it and got replaced in heat 8 by a 16 year old 🤷🏻‍♂️

If we can’t have Bednar then I’d be trying for Gusts… can’t have a number 2 scoring 0 at home, it’s just a no go