That would have been 10.49 to replace 9.85 when the team was already 4.30 over the points limit, so you could only have had 6.19 to make a double change.
Wonder if they were using last year's rule book and trying to fit into a 42.5 limit?
Nah probably not.
Probably just thought we'll replace 2 riders who total n.nn with a different 2 who total no more than n.nn and we'll be good to go.
Err no, read the rules.
We all would have had him back any time.
But the rest of the team has been scoring so well - as was seen at Ippo on Thursday.
No problem in you dropping him - just the timing.
Neither do you.
But I'd be pretty sure there was no contract pay-off.
Just dumped with no chance of another job because of the timing.
Sorry - but that stinks.
The sport's got to change - contracts must mean contracts and proper notice periods need to be brought in or payment made to buy out the agreements.
Maybe Auty will sort him out and show his the back wheel - in the nicest possible way of course!!
That was the point I was making.
If Sedgy has been left with only a few hours to find another club - Peterboroughesque.
Folk feel he has been under-performing for weeks so a change could have been made a while ago.
Sorry Mr. hut - I couldn't for the life of me remember what they were called!!
Very nice though!!
And yes multiple generations of the Newman clan all in the same place!!
I think lunatic team pairings may have played a part in a couple of those did they not?
And the really difficult track at Armadiddle where some of your guys didn't use the head about how to ride it.
Sorry Sue - should have looked out for you at the beginning and given you some provisions!!