foreverblue

I agree always expected a Swindon win but the margin is surprising and Poole should have won but Holder and North were poor whereas all the Robins heat leaders did their job with Zengota proving why Howarth had to go. Krcmar is a worry for them and his days in Robins colours may be numbered, have to get a double upper in maybe.

I dont see Swindon giving us too many problems although we may let them sneak a point

Coventry have plenty to race for, being top is important who wants to win the play offs at a away track, much better to win it at home, i speak from experience!

Blimey pokc and sychophants twice well done keep up the good work!!

There is nothing wrong with Charles Wright at reserve, definately give Garrity a run for his money.

The advantage is that you can have the second leg at home.

There has to a cut off though or you just get endless postponements and means the public still get short changed as they wouldn't refund for the original 10 heat meeting would they.

I doubt it will rain tonight so you won't have that to worry about.

Easy 4 points Darcy unbeaten.

Your forgetting Davey Watt likes riding in the rain!

Hopefully it will rain, then Havvy will want it called off after heat 9 and Lakeside take all the points!!

That doesn't mean he wasn't trying and he did get paid 10 for Lakeside against Leicester. So your saying at the start of your post an easy away win then at the end Lakeside may sneak a win!! Personally hoping for a easy Lakeside win.

But your rubbish in the wet!

Why wouldnt Watt give full effort on a track he was a number one, Nillsson is very good at home but Watt is better in my view and riding well at the moment.

I think lakeside could win, watt improves the team over nillsson and roynon is going well so could ruffle garrity a bit.

He wasnt in control of his bike as he crossed the line but he may have still been in contact with his bike.

I thought he had crossed the line in contact from where i was standing. My point is if one of them had stayed down North would have been excluded so he shouldn't have got the point as it was his fault Gomolski laid his bike down.

Well that's not me is it, i have never condoned Matt Ford's actions when he has done wrong but that comment is anti Poole in my view.

You dont think the up matt fords arse comment is anti poole then!!You dont have to stick up for him just because he supports your team.

I have always maintained it probably shouldn't have started but in fairness they had done a great job on the track and it was in a raceable condition. How do you think Coventry were looking at it considering they were losing. Coventry riders did not refuse to race heat 9 only heat 10. Everyone knew it would only get to heat 10, as always your trying to make out in some way it was Poole's fault which it wasn't. How does it discredit Poole?

I don't think refusing to race is petty and if they didn't get fined it would open up a whole new can of worms, the amount of the fine another question. The fan always seem to come last unless clubs give discounts for sky meetings and give value for money, perhaps they could discount the programme too as it is rarely good value for money. If clubs are going to continue to produce a programme from a previous meeting with a two page insert then they are only going to make fans annoyed, if programmes were all like the programme at Swindon when Poole were there then there wouldn't be a problem.

Probably because their not very high in the league and Darcy riding is always exciting

But if Gomolski had stayed down it would have been re-run or awarded and the referee would have had to exclude North as a primary cause of the stoppage.

But surely the rider that went down first is the primary cause so he should be excluded and had they stayed down that is what would of happened.

Got all a bit confusing in heat 14 when Dakota North came down and Gomolski laid it down to avoid crashing in to him, they both got up and continued and North but North should have been excluded for the primary cause of the stoppage which he wasn't so that's a point North should have deducted and given to Gomolski. In fairness though they both got up and didn't try to stay down and get a re-run.