Arson fire

you're a man?? Hands up, i got that wrong

houston wasnt banned, i never said he was??... But... Someone posted ' why ' .... Not swearing, not derogetory or nothing and got banned, yet houston swore and never got banned... Is that fair??

might be something simple Like a screw loose??

Lindgren will be back,canny lad, lives local, important sponsorship, canny lad, very consistent, canny lad, great team rider,canny lad, improving all the time,canny lad, excellent away from home, canny lad and can ride numerous lines around Brough.... Shoe in!! Happy days

Gustix, people get banned from that group for merely posting why??... Do you think that is fair??The poster, i believe it was Houston was said to be intimidated, dont you feel that excuse is just a cop out to keep the group to only those that share the same views?? Its pretty lame, even you must agree?? Then the same poster who was meant to be intimidated by someone asking 'why' posted "bunch of fkg idiots" that was since deleted but he wasnt banned. Surely that shows you how Karl runs his ship?? He wants only his arse lickers and no-one with an alternate opinion or view. He told another poster that they had to like all speedway riders ffs, whats the world coming to when a grown man tells other grown men what they should like?? I left the group because of all the nerds who cant debate if you have a different view, plus the photos are boring after the first million.

i was thinking that aswell

Be interesting to see which clubs signed the most 5 pointers since the ruling that maybe should have been a 7.... And who benefited most. Someone at the bspa made the call, question is... Why??

why??

allegedly he should have been 7 and not 5

christ, the majority then .... Kick them all out i say Tbf at least douglas and wells are half decent, campton isnt imo

depends when this rule was brought in from, if its a while then their is a good few more aswell.... Sedgy? Poole??

well if (barncooseboy) i think it was, is right? Then the BSPA have commited one almighty cock up, so god knows lol

because its a totally seperate visa??Somerset being pooles bitch is doing them no favours long term surely?

no?? His visa was issued for this season as he sat last season out due too..... Visa problems

depends if wolbert and wethers arnt on the way down, they both looked last year tbh

so if you agree a 2 year loan deal, why is it only done year on year??....whats the point in agreeing 2 years if it has to be re visited or issued in 12 month?? Or If kus had been woeful last season and say averaged 3..... Would berwick still have to take up the 2nd year option?? Its a daft way of doing business, (2 years)... Esp if its not binding??

The key is finding a big improver in clegg, branford or the 5 pointer should cook and masters be the other 2. Maybe wolbert will add a little bit, and sedgy will probably be more or less the same.... Cant see a worrall type improvement from the 2 reserves this year, which will be good and bring the monarchs back to the chasing pack Think no Deek will be hard to cover aswell.

so if it was for 2 years then Havvy should have had the 2 year payment initially?? And if it was for 2 years then why would dialouge be needed at AGM and then via email if it was set in stone and binding??... Seems the 2 year agreement was more likely verbally agreed rather than contractually, if so then old havvy is well within his rights imo. A bit shallow to renege but his first concern had to be redcar not berwick.... Esp after the lawson carry on.

they can force them back Dave, unless it is stipulated in the loan agreement that its season long with no option for call backs.... A club can call any other player back under any other loan agreement, regardless of which club it benefits... Works the other way aswell, which we will prob see in jan with HBA being booted back by Hull

Daz you heard lots of things, most havent been true, people are thinking you're HP is just Aldi special lad

The asset system is a scam anyway... EL teams could sign riders and have them as assets and then cream off loan payments from PL clubs whilst they did their apprenticeship, and without ever coming to the tapes for them...or strike some sort of deal that looks the case between poole and somerset...yet PL teams have to get and average for a rider before he becomes an asset Peterboro had a asset list as long as your arm and half of them didnt ride for them initially.

you dont know this is the case though?? The kozza allegation is down to the rider surely??..... If kus wanted to ride for berwick he would do, no court in the land would advocate restriction of trade... Hes average anyway so you have dodged a bullet....

when is speedway ever fair though?? You lot were doing summersaults when you got bellego as an asset ... Didnt hear you moaning then?? It wasnt fair on Glasgow surely?? Unless kus or old havvy tells the truth we will never know i suppose, and berwick infamous for over hyping, over spinning, under playing things to suit aswell imo.

if kus had a backbone and really wanted to be at berwick.... He wouldnt have signed for redcar surely??

they did similar with Bellego didnt they?