Sings4Speedway

Replace as far as i know with as quoted by the Plymouth promotion. Anyway as it stands i do think its wrong that riders without team places cannot guest within the NL. I would even go as far to say that these riders could even get a reduction to promote the use of unattached riders but the rules are as they are (for this season at least). There have been plenty of better riders who have faded into the background due to the classic numbers game and i suspect that will continue its just the nature of the sport

Agreed. Riders in that situation who its a little harder on as they were eligible last year until the rule change although in all fairness Jamie isn't keen on travel and William has ridden for almost every team in the league.

I thought it was Postman Pat who posted post?

Id be very surprised if that was the case. Probably best for Sheffield to move forward and be the priority again.

Avoidance yep Puma (too narrow) and not so long ago brought a pair of Kappa's wore them briefly and the sole started to detach so returned them for a replacement and they did the same thing a few weeks later .

Very true in all fairness Lee Kilby switching his allegiances to Swindon have had a factor too as he was doing some positive work in the previous seasons.

No pre match build up from the promotion once again? Is the PR element from the club slipping or are they bracing for another rain off?

No doubt that a fit and race sharp Gilkes returning will make the Kings a much bigger force (at least for the month he spends at reserve) but as ever once he moves into the team his threat will be nullified a bit like the Thompsons / Palin so its down to who fills the positions. Kent are likely to see Spooner at reserve and he could be even more dangerous there whereas Leicester with Ryan Mac & the ever absent Halder not so much. Are there any update on Gilkes likely return date? Obviously with a promising career it would be foolish to rush back but there must come a cut off point when he will choose to sit out the remainder of the year and maintain his 2.00 average plus im sure there is a signing deadline in July but of course that could have secretly changed?

Doh! Bit to early for me clearly.

Similar issue. I have a pair of day glo orange laces and hunting the perfect trainers to fit them into

im now starting to feel the pressure with limited days left. With roughly 11 years left, pair of trainers lasting circa 6 months that's less than 22 pairs left in my existence time....got to choose wisely

Who was expecting Adam Sheppard to be on a paid max after his first 3 rides? Whilst the win was secured there must be a few alarm bells ringing at Kent? The pre season favourites do look like there is a tendency to self destruct a little. Spooner obviously rusty, Jenkins & Ledwith brilliant but inconsistent and Kemp yet to set his season on fire. Fortunately the mature beyond his years Rowe held things together. By most debut season Ablitt is having a decent one but with much promise he is being eclipsed by the others stepping into the league and with the Gladiators reserve pairing not being one of the leagues strongest there are signs of weakness in the once dominant Kings side.

Fair point although Baseby "retired" due to lack of team place/high average and Hampshire "took a break/got the hump" for the same reason. Fact is Wally couldn't hold down his team place for a full season yet again and has to pay the price just like any other rider.

Not sure that the NL fours has priority over CL so you may be stuck with Danny but do also get Max which is a huge bonus especially after his 18 point Max last night.

Group A could be interesting Group B looks a forgone conclusion.

Agreed not exactly the future of the sport. Them's the rules and that's the way it is however shock horror there is one moaner so in the interests of fairness im just off to start threads about Tom Wooley, Dan Greenwood, Mark Baseby, Paul Hurry, Taylor Hampshire, Luke Bowen, Tony Atkin, Rob Suttleworth, Ben Hopwood & Adam Roynon who are all in the same boat and need somebody to moan on their behalfs also.

adidas stan smiths.....worth the prestige or is someone taking the mick with basic designs and sticking a name to it?

Are they on daily shuffle and therefore worn once a year or are some collectors pieces?

Amen to that. Then get a finance package out on a Mustang or similar and see if i can shave a few days off

Interesting so circa 11 1/2 years. If i can get a mortgage for 30+ years im laughing right?

like the look of a converse on normal people but with my size 12's they look like clown shoes

a pacamac now theres a fashion banana skin waiting to happen. practical & stylish vs nerdy and over prepared

i do like a no sock trainer BUT they just don't last long enough before the insoles start peeling away. However another nightmare is trainer socks

Feel your pain. I have a couple of green t-shirts. Fine across the cooler months but last summer tried to combine with shorts and a no go. Looks terrible with denim and my grey cotton shorts were too smart for them.....who'd be a man. Very handy thread this though i must agree

I have to admit that sambas are creeping further and further up the list. Does have to be adidas whatever. Trying to keep them nice and multi purpose as it will be a with jeans and with shorts daily go to shoe.