Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

SCB

Members
  • Posts

    18,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    357

Everything posted by SCB

  1. Erm, I used Jon Cooks thoughts and flipped them on him. And if Jon Cook was one of my employers clients of fully expect to lose my job for calling him such a thing. Lucky we don't sell to stupid people! Regarding he term retard, I would never use it to describe someone who had an illness or disability. And I doubt anyone with any decency ever would. But that doesn't mean the word can't be used in its correct way. You wouldn't call a gay person queer but you might someone being odd as queer.
  2. You can't go making statements like that without evidence. So here it is...... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3132042/Karl-Oyston-s-offensive-text-messages-revealed-FA-release-Blackpool-chairman-s-abusive-rant.html
  3. Do you want to show me that in a dictionary? Just because you're both sickos who use such words for people with disabilities doesn't mean we all are. Don't just us by your won gutter standards.
  4. I'll just leave this here.... https://twitter.com/middlo57/status/561235332671504384
  5. It's nothing to do with mental illness, what a weird connection
  6. Sidney got it, you don't seem to. The thread title was meant to cause outrage and be a stupid comment to annoy people that I have no plans to justify. Just so I can call people biased and thick. Most people have got it, it's no shock that you haven't. I guess I could have called him a "nice, honest man with the utmost integrity" and people would have been equally as shocked!
  7. So stupid is ok, retard isn't? You do realise they mean the same thing right? I guess if you're a retard you may not realise that.
  8. You know when Sidney and Starman are not happy with you that you're onto something and you're thoughts/opinions are vindicated
  9. Of course it was. Why else do you think you give subjects a heading? Thats an odd question that only had one answer. It wouldn't have really worked if I had called the topic, "Jon Cook Is A Man" would it?
  10. I'd normally say it makes me laugh when people get offended on behalf of others (retards in this case) but I'm not sure thats whats happening here!! I accept the Gustix comment was close to the line but it was a joke and not meant with any malice.
  11. You're fecking kidding? The guy took a year out so surely has to start again?!
  12. Isn't it funny, I throw back Jon Cooks quote at him and it's " totally out of order", "A complete insult", I should be banned and I should justify the comments. Normally I would agree, but as I have just taken Jon Cooks disgusting comment to show how terrible they are. For the record, anyone who has discussed or questioned the heat leader list, Jon Cook thinks you're "thick or biased, or both". When Jon Cook justify his comments that I am, "thick or biased, or both" then I'll justify mine
  13. Probably in the box of record in the attic next to the pile of speedway stars and programmes!
  14. If you don't agree you're either thick or biased, or both.
  15. Because of course members of the BSPA are never thick or biased?!
  16. TBF, that only confirms my point. Weeks after winning the titles failed to score in the WTC. The following year failed to score in the Continental Final. He was a second division rider in Poland most of his career too, at a time when the Polish first division was nothing to get excited about!
  17. Now if only someone (or a group of people) had come up with this great idea before!!
  18. I see the point. I'd argue any 5 year spell where no rider wins a title twice suggests to me that there was not "great" rider around at the time, just a lot of pretty good riders (admittedly there a gaping flaw here as Jan O and Per both had careers ended due to injury) especially as Sam and Havvy never really did a huge amount afterwards. Looking at the numbers (and thats pretty much all I have as memories of Hans are not great until the GP years for me) Hans strikes me as a man who would have won 10 World Titles had the GP series been in place 15 years earlier, he was a model of consistency and all them GP finals he'd have made would have made him close to impossible to beat. As for Egon Muller, I remember looking at his stats in the past and deciding he was a higher class version of Smolinksi who fluked a GP win but never really was that good. Muller was a very good rider on his day but if it wasn't his day it seems he could be crap. But also something in the middle. Again, give him a GP series and I'll say very Rune Holta-ish. Would throw in the odd stormer, the odd naff one but always finishing 6th to 10th. I think he's always given a harsh time as he shouldn't have been World Champion and barely rode in the UK but he was a decent rider - just not best in the World. He's not comparable to Szczakiel who had 1 decent meeting in his whole career!
  19. Sarjeant, Ellis, North, Kennett, Starke, Auty and I'll add Bjerre should he be Lynns last signing. edit - actually, it's going to bne mainly the tier 2 reserves, in fact I wouldn't be shocked it Sarj doubles his average!
  20. That it for me. The two of them were bumping and barging. So they had to accept that whoever went down was the loser.
  21. Sounds like it.... http://speedwayupdates.proboards.com/thread/15166/cradley-eastbourne-nlkoc-21-2015
  22. Cradley. That's Cradley who ride at Birmingham. But Birmingham were second. Seriously, only speedway could vote the sub-tenant best! Surely it's either a draw or as main tenant a Birmingham win?!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy