singy13 Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago So we draw nearer to the 'big decision' regarding UK speedways future. Hopefully the right call is made to assist clubs long term involvement. I like a bit of nostalgia so I looked back at my first season of watching speedway. It was 1970 Workington Comets giving fantastic thrills via Bob (Mr. Excitement)Valentine and co. Do you know there were 19 teams in Division One and 17 teams in Division Two = 36 teams in that season? So each team with 7 riders times 36 = 252 riders...Yes I've been told some doubled up on previous posts I've made on this forum - but hey not a great many riders did that. Which makes it most likely 200 + riders made it a sport to be proud of and well loved by many fans.(Apparently the third most popular UK sport then). So nowadays the sport struggles along via 16 clubs, most riders using the doubling up farce - probably less than 100 riders entertaining us. I have no advice to give a cure all to keep UK speedway afloat other than I think one division needs to be given at least a fair trial???? Who knows, if successful, fans and riders may well flock back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, singy13 said: So we draw nearer to the 'big decision' regarding UK speedways future. Hopefully the right call is made to assist clubs long term involvement. I like a bit of nostalgia so I looked back at my first season of watching speedway. It was 1970 Workington Comets giving fantastic thrills via Bob (Mr. Excitement)Valentine and co. Do you know there were 19 teams in Division One and 17 teams in Division Two = 36 teams in that season? So each team with 7 riders times 36 = 252 riders...Yes I've been told some doubled up on previous posts I've made on this forum - but hey not a great many riders did that. Which makes it most likely 200 + riders made it a sport to be proud of and well loved by many fans.(Apparently the third most popular UK sport then). So nowadays the sport struggles along via 16 clubs, most riders using the doubling up farce - probably less than 100 riders entertaining us. I have no advice to give a cure all to keep UK speedway afloat other than I think one division needs to be given at least a fair trial???? Who knows, if successful, fans and riders may well flock back. A completely different time, sadly... Most of those riders had jobs, and rode for excitement, and the "good money" they could earn for two or three meetings a week.... Lads in mundane jobs by day could be "heroes" in the evening, and go home with more than a weeks worth of money from their usual job for just one meeting.. And admission costs made a massively lower dent in the fans' disposable income than happens today... Plus, many ran Friday and Saturdays rather than Mondays and Thursdays... Now it is "two top bikes" minimum, sign written vans, hotel costs, flight costs, tuner costs, and a travel schedule that Jet2 would go dizzy with... 100's rocked up to the many training schools across the country, some sharing bikes they purchased together,(old several owners kit so didn't cost the earth), some riding old bikes fhe tracks had, hence there was a conveyer belt of potential talent, and, most riders only had one team so they didn't block progression like the majority do now by having two teams each, which erodes places for others... The Poles have "dozens" of riders who organically travel through a development structure as they know that to keep their sponsors, fans and TV happy, it is important to have "new talent" coming through regularly... They don't want to end up like the UK with guestfests and doubling up and down rife, as that will end the same way for them that is has for the UK... One league unfortunately looks unachievable if you look at the numbers of riders, unless another 20 or so want to ride over here, and given Poland ride Friday, Saturday and Sunday, (with the odd Thursday thrown in for good measure), getting another 20 would be very difficult indeed, unless like some tracks have done, you sign riders who you know will miss quite a few matches, and just accept guestfests as being the only way the sport can be ran over here... If you don't get more riders to come over, and run with one league, then many riders at six and seven (if they stay with seven per team), would be well out of their depth I would think... I personally think having a "Super League" with six, six rider teams, could maybe work, using only riders of say 4.5 points and above averages, and then they also run a 2nd tier team alongside all other teams, with three or so of their top tier riders, plus second tier level lads making up the rest of the tier two team... It will keep the DU'ing for many riders that they say they need, and still have a top tier at a significantly higher level to sell the sport to TV and its viewers... Edited 4 hours ago by mikebv 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackInTheDHSS Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago I'm not sure the rider shortage is as bad as everybody makes out. Yes it's not 200+, but I still make it 150 riders who competed (or were declared in a line-up at the start of the year) in 2025. Yes, some are very junior/inexperienced, but everybody has to start somewhere, and there were definite mismatches in the 1970s. 1. Nathan Ablitt 2. Jake Allen 3. Ben Barker 4. Troy Batchelor 5. Luke Becker 6. Dan Bewley 7. Ollie Binns 8. Norick Blodorn 9. Owen Booth 10. Bastian Borke 11. Ashton Boughen 12. Fraser Bowes 13. Alfie Bowtell 14. Tom Brennan 15. Max Broadhurst 16. Billy Budd 17. Arran Butcher 18. William Cairns 19. Paco Castagna 20. Jacob Clouting 21. Connor Coles 22. Ben Cook 23. Craig Cook 24. Zach Cook 25. Kenzie Cossey 26. Mitchell Cluff 27. Luke Craig 28. Jack Crewe 29. Joe Crewe 30. Harley Driscoll-Freeman 31. Kieran Douglas 32. Ryan Douglas 33. Jason Doyle 34. Jason Edwards 35. Adam Ellis 36. Joe Etheridge 37. Jamie Etherington 38. Harry Fletcher 39. Leon Flint 40. Vinnie Foord 41. Jack Franklin 42. Lasse Fredriksen 43. Max Fricke 44. Dan Gilkes 45. Jonatan Grahn 46. Liam Greens 47. Francis Gusts 48. Sam Hagon 49. Jamie Halder 50. Nathan Hargrave 51. Chris Harris 52. Luke Harris 53. Luke Harrison 54. Cameron Heeps 55. Freddy Hodder 56. Chris Holder 57. Jack Holder 58. Jacob Hook 59. Kyle Howarth 60. Danyon Hume 61. Ryan Ingram 62. Niels-Kristian Iversen 63. Max James 64. Maciej Janowski 65. Jordan Jenkins 66. Jonas Jeppesen 67. Michael Jepsen Jensen 68. Elliot Kelly 69. Drew Kemp 70. Declan Kennedy 71. Zaine Kennedy 72. Lewis Kerr 73. Peter Kildemand 74. Luke Killeen 75. Danny King 76. Jack Kingston 77. Daniel Klima 78. Nicoli Klindt 79. Jonas Knudsen 80. Brady Kurtz 81. Jan Kvetch 82. Simon Lambert 83. Richard Lawson 84. Jaimon Linsey 85. Jordy Loftus 86. Kryan Lyden 87. Matt Marson 88. Caydin Martin 89. Sam Masters 90. Mitch McDiarmid 91. Harry McGurk 92. Sam McGurk 93. Eli Meadows 94. Calum Mitchell 95. Nick Morris 96. Ben Morley 97. Connor Mountain 98. Luke Muff 99. Jake Mulford 100. Tobiasz Musielak 101. Villads Nagel 102. Scott Nicholls 103. Michael Palm Toft 104. Victor Palovaara 105. Mark Parker 106. Max Perry 107. Danny Phillips 108. Josh Pickering 109. Ace Pijper 110. Stene Pijper 111. Oskar Polis 112. Ben Rathbone 113. Keynan Rew 114. Laylen Richardson 115. Darryl Ritchings 116. Harrison Rogers 117. Anders Rowe 118. Adam Roynon 119. Erik Riss 120. Cooper Rushen 121. Emil Sayfutdinov 122. Jody Scott 123. Justin Sedgmen 124. Jack Shimelt 125. Mickie Simpson 126. Charlie Southwick 127. Tom Spencer 128. Sonny Springer 129. Jack Smith 130. Paul Starke 131. Senna Summers 132. Dan Thompson 133. Joe Thompson 134. Tobias Thomsen 135. Kye Thomson 136. Ben Trigger 137. Rohan Tungate 138. Ashton Vale 139. Antti Vuolas 140. Kai Ward 141. Mason Watson 142. Morgan Williams 143. Chad Wirtzfeld 144. Charlie Wood 145. Dayle Wood 146. Sam Woods 147. Steve Worrall 148. Charles Wright 149. Matej Zagar 150. Tate Zischke 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago It would be a challenge to get enough people to lay out circa £25 to watch some of those riders... No disrespect to them, but the admission fee would need to be around £15 to watch them ride and that wouldn't cover the "best riders" fees... My lad plays semi pro football as an amateur, (£10 to watch), and it would be like the league was set up to allow him to play against Mo Salah.... That tenner to get in wouldn't pay Mo's wages.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackInTheDHSS Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, mikebv said: It would be a challenge to get enough people to lay out circa £25 to watch some of those riders... No disrespect to them, but the admission fee would need to be around £15 to watch them ride and that wouldn't cover the "best riders" fees... My lad plays semi pro football as an amateur, (£10 to watch), and it would be like the league was set up to allow him to play against Mo Salah.... That tenner to get in wouldn't pay Mo's wages.... Fair point. Over 100 of those listed regularly raced in the top two leagues, though, with people expected to pay £20+ already. Although that could also explain the current attendance issues! 😃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singy13 Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 43 minutes ago, BackInTheDHSS said: Fair point. Over 100 of those listed regularly raced in the top two leagues, though, with people expected to pay £20+ already. Although that could also explain the current attendance issues! 😃 The current attendance issues are due to fans not liking guest fests and doubling up. Both of these rider problems dilute the sports integrity for so many fans. Lots have abandoned ship because they have seen too many teams use three, or more in some cases, guests. I often talked with Workington rugby directors, who were anti-speedway, and referred to the sport as having a strong likeness to that comical one called WWE (or is it WWF?)...anyway they said guests undermined the sport big style - and yes they were/are correct. Personally I just think the one division would bring more variety to a quite stagnant round of fixtures. And so what if Poland claim the best, every race has a winner, and loser. We used to have wobblers yes fifty years ago but shouted encouragement to one and all....let's do it via one league again !!!!!! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 41 minutes ago, singy13 said: The current attendance issues are due to fans not liking guest fests and doubling up. Both of these rider problems dilute the sports integrity for so many fans. Lots have abandoned ship because they have seen too many teams use three, or more in some cases, guests. I often talked with Workington rugby directors, who were anti-speedway, and referred to the sport as having a strong likeness to that comical one called WWE (or is it WWF?)...anyway they said guests undermined the sport big style - and yes they were/are correct. Personally I just think the one division would bring more variety to a quite stagnant round of fixtures. And so what if Poland claim the best, every race has a winner, and loser. We used to have wobblers yes fifty years ago but shouted encouragement to one and all....let's do it via one league again !!!!!! The part re guestfests and DU's, I 100% agree... And "one league" would bring variety... Unfortunately fans of teams used to watching Kurtz, Emil, Bewley, Holder, Fricke, Doyle etc, and paying around twenty five quid to do so, are going to have to see a significant reduction in admission costs to watch some of the riders mentioned, (if the riders who ride in Poland are not there).. And even if they do sign these riders up, they will miss so many meetings every week on Fridays and Saturdays, that it would make the league a complete farce... The top two division clubs seem to average between 500 to 1500 or so, and their rents won't be dropping, nor will their expectations of their riders to spend quite frankly ludicrous sums to compete, therefore admission costs cannot drop too much I would say... And any reduction in admission wouldn't see enough increase in attendances I would suggest to cover all the costs, given the dilution of the riders on show... A true conundrum for people who have demonstrated many times that they may not have the skill set required to sort out the issues... Edited 4 hours ago by mikebv 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Smith Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, BackInTheDHSS said: I'm not sure the rider shortage is as bad as everybody makes out. Yes it's not 200+, but I still make it 150 riders who competed (or were declared in a line-up at the start of the year) in 2025. Yes, some are very junior/inexperienced, but everybody has to start somewhere, and there were definite mismatches in the 1970s. 1. Nathan Ablitt 2. Jake Allen 3. Ben Barker 4. Troy Batchelor 5. Luke Becker 6. Dan Bewley 7. Ollie Binns 8. Norick Blodorn 9. Owen Booth 10. Bastian Borke 11. Ashton Boughen 12. Fraser Bowes 13. Alfie Bowtell 14. Tom Brennan 15. Max Broadhurst 16. Billy Budd 17. Arran Butcher 18. William Cairns 19. Paco Castagna 20. Jacob Clouting 21. Connor Coles 22. Ben Cook 23. Craig Cook 24. Zach Cook 25. Kenzie Cossey 26. Mitchell Cluff 27. Luke Craig 28. Jack Crewe 29. Joe Crewe 30. Harley Driscoll-Freeman 31. Kieran Douglas 32. Ryan Douglas 33. Jason Doyle 34. Jason Edwards 35. Adam Ellis 36. Joe Etheridge 37. Jamie Etherington 38. Harry Fletcher 39. Leon Flint 40. Vinnie Foord 41. Jack Franklin 42. Lasse Fredriksen 43. Max Fricke 44. Dan Gilkes 45. Jonatan Grahn 46. Liam Greens 47. Francis Gusts 48. Sam Hagon 49. Jamie Halder 50. Nathan Hargrave 51. Chris Harris 52. Luke Harris 53. Luke Harrison 54. Cameron Heeps 55. Freddy Hodder 56. Chris Holder 57. Jack Holder 58. Jacob Hook 59. Kyle Howarth 60. Danyon Hume 61. Ryan Ingram 62. Niels-Kristian Iversen 63. Max James 64. Maciej Janowski 65. Jordan Jenkins 66. Jonas Jeppesen 67. Michael Jepsen Jensen 68. Elliot Kelly 69. Drew Kemp 70. Declan Kennedy 71. Zaine Kennedy 72. Lewis Kerr 73. Peter Kildemand 74. Luke Killeen 75. Danny King 76. Jack Kingston 77. Daniel Klima 78. Nicoli Klindt 79. Jonas Knudsen 80. Brady Kurtz 81. Jan Kvetch 82. Simon Lambert 83. Richard Lawson 84. Jaimon Linsey 85. Jordy Loftus 86. Kryan Lyden 87. Matt Marson 88. Caydin Martin 89. Sam Masters 90. Mitch McDiarmid 91. Harry McGurk 92. Sam McGurk 93. Eli Meadows 94. Calum Mitchell 95. Nick Morris 96. Ben Morley 97. Connor Mountain 98. Luke Muff 99. Jake Mulford 100. Tobiasz Musielak 101. Villads Nagel 102. Scott Nicholls 103. Michael Palm Toft 104. Victor Palovaara 105. Mark Parker 106. Max Perry 107. Danny Phillips 108. Josh Pickering 109. Ace Pijper 110. Stene Pijper 111. Oskar Polis 112. Ben Rathbone 113. Keynan Rew 114. Laylen Richardson 115. Darryl Ritchings 116. Harrison Rogers 117. Anders Rowe 118. Adam Roynon 119. Erik Riss 120. Cooper Rushen 121. Emil Sayfutdinov 122. Jody Scott 123. Justin Sedgmen 124. Jack Shimelt 125. Mickie Simpson 126. Charlie Southwick 127. Tom Spencer 128. Sonny Springer 129. Jack Smith 130. Paul Starke 131. Senna Summers 132. Dan Thompson 133. Joe Thompson 134. Tobias Thomsen 135. Kye Thomson 136. Ben Trigger 137. Rohan Tungate 138. Ashton Vale 139. Antti Vuolas 140. Kai Ward 141. Mason Watson 142. Morgan Williams 143. Chad Wirtzfeld 144. Charlie Wood 145. Dayle Wood 146. Sam Woods 147. Steve Worrall 148. Charles Wright 149. Matej Zagar 150. Tate Zischke 1 league would see a good chunk of rider's knocked off that list as they'd be unavailable due to Swedish and Polish demands, maybe also Germany & Denmark. I personally feel 1 league will be disastrous 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackInTheDHSS Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 23 minutes ago, Daniel Smith said: 1 league would see a good chunk of rider's knocked off that list as they'd be unavailable due to Swedish and Polish demands, maybe also Germany & Denmark. I personally feel 1 league will be disastrous But would that not mean the 50 riders of lower quality were more likely to be competitive? Lose the top 50 and gain the bottom 50, or vice versa. Either way, there’s a pool of 100 riders to choose from? Regardless of the standard of racing, there are enough riders riding in the second and third tiers to fill one big league. Edited 4 hours ago by BackInTheDHSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Smith Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 22 minutes ago, BackInTheDHSS said: But would that not mean the 50 riders of lower quality were more likely to be competitive? Lose the top 50 and gain the bottom 50, or vice versa. Either way, there’s a pool of 100 riders to choose from? Regardless of the standard of racing, there are enough riders riding in the second and third tiers to fill one big league. Make that the "1 Big League" then. Leave Belle Vue, Ipswich, Sheffield, Leicester & King's Lynn to come up with their own NEW format for a potential "Super League." What I would like, it's inventive:- 5 man teams for the regular season, home & away x2. Now, the invention 😬 An "All Team Tournament" x2 at each stadium, where a 'World Cup' style format can be used & the points also count towards the league table. Points can be standardised, like: Regular League: Win 3pts, Draw 1pt, Lose 0pts ATT: 1st 6pts, 2nd 4pts, 3rd 3pts, 4th 2pts, 5th 0pts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1 valve Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, BackInTheDHSS said: But would that not mean the 50 riders of lower quality were more likely to be competitive? Lose the top 50 and gain the bottom 50, or vice versa. Either way, there’s a pool of 100 riders to choose from? Regardless of the standard of racing, there are enough riders riding in the second and third tiers to fill one big league. A pool of 100 riders to form a league “regardless of the standard of racing”? Well that there is the quickest and surest way to finish UK speedway off once and for all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technik Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, singy13 said: The current attendance issues are due to fans not liking guest fests and doubling up. Both of these rider problems dilute the sports integrity for so many fans. Lots have abandoned ship because they have seen too many teams use three, or more in some cases, guests. I often talked with Workington rugby directors, who were anti-speedway, and referred to the sport as having a strong likeness to that comical one called WWE (or is it WWF?)...anyway they said guests undermined the sport big style - and yes they were/are correct. Personally I just think the one division would bring more variety to a quite stagnant round of fixtures. And so what if Poland claim the best, every race has a winner, and loser. We used to have wobblers yes fifty years ago but shouted encouragement to one and all....let's do it via one league again !!!!!! Whilst not being a fan of the guest facility to compare British Speedway to the way Rugby, Football or Cricket works is misguided. Our team structure is based on a solid 7 man team with no extras. If you go along to other sports they have many substitutes they can bring into a game at any point or even start different players for each game. The position of Goalkeeper at most football clubs is for one person with a second sitting on the bench & a third who trains but never selected. Ice Hockey has 3 or 4 lineups for each game changing on the fly. Rugby has 5 replacements each game, In all reality are they not using a simiular facility to speedway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.