Hancock/pedersen Incident

[Liontamer 202]

Page 25:

 

Well I'm sorry but I can't agree with you. If you saw it from the same angle as I did then you would have no doubts whatsoever that Hancock deleberately took Nicki into the fence.

 

However, as this thread has now run to 25 pages & we are never going to agree, maybe it's time the mods locked it.

[home straight 290]

[pirate paul 1]

Sorry your all wrong. Nicki should have given Greg more room to get out wide and then he deliberatelty rode into his back wheel to mke it look like Gregs fault. A clear exclusion for Pedersen.

Edited June 26, 2005 by pirate paul

[Midnight Blue 0]

Bring back the Cardiff referee!!

Pedersen should have been excluded, it was just a hard second bend, sometimes confused with first bend bunching by riders who should know better and race commentators.

 

What about Scotty, gets knocked off at the first bend (first bend incident ) then gets excluded!!

Later picks himself up off the floor to let the race continue......................well said Chris Louis about needing to stay down.

 

Well done TRick another master class.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tony Millard: Was that incident caused by the green light...................................

[Eastie 0]

As this thread is about Greg hitting Nicki how the hell can you blame Nicki, PIRATE Paul.???

Shows how biassed you lot are . What if it had been the other way round , another 20 pages of anti Nicki lemmings. If anyone should have been excluded it should have been Greg .

Also the Crump incident on Hampel .was it Nicki ???? no ........................ it doesn't matter then.

Edited June 26, 2005 by Eastie

[Midnight Blue 0]

Crump was very hard on Hampel and fairly or unfairly if he does not fall the race usually continues, irrespective of Pedersens past misdemeanors in this case i felt he should have been excluded for causing the race to be stopped.

[Star Lady 5,400]

Amazing how a thread gets hijacked by serious people. I'm with LT this thread should have been locked 4 pages ago

[Liontamer 202]

It's a bit like baking a cake. You chuck in the ingredients & give 'em a quick stir, then you stand back & watch it rise. Edited June 26, 2005 by Liontamer

[Star Lady 5,400]

Sounds like a recipe for Yorkshire Puds

[pirate paul 1]

As this thread is about Greg hitting Nicki how the hell can you blame Nicki, PIRATE  Paul.???

Shows how biassed you lot are . What if it had been the other way round , another 20 pages of anti Nicki lemmings. If anyone should have been excluded it should have been Greg .

Also the Crump incident on Hampel .was it Nicki ???? no ........................  it doesn't matter then.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Perhaps looking up the word 'irony' in the dictionary may help?

[Eastie 0]

Crump was very hard on Hampel and fairly or unfairly if he does not fall the race usually continues, irrespective of Pedersens past misdemeanors in this case i felt he should have been excluded for causing the race to be stopped.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It depends if the cause was due to Nicki falling or Greg hitting Nicki and we can see on the slowmo that Greg in fact hits him twice before he went down so the cause of the stoppage was Greg.

What I like about Nicki is that he doesnt do all the diving, fingerpointing and waving arm like other riders do.

With the Hampel / Crump incident you dont have to fall. Crump could have been excluded for unfair riding after the race had finished.

[Liontamer 202]

Sounds like a recipe for Yorkshire Puds

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

They don't call me Delia for nothing SL.

[Star Lady 5,400]

With the amount of rise you are getting LT, I would suggest diversifying into gourmet souffle

[Liontamer 202]

With the amount of rise you are getting LT, I would suggest diversifying into gourmet souffle

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

You know me, always one for taking the rise.

[richtea 1]

With the amount of rise you are getting LT, I would suggest diversifying into gourmet souffle

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Liontamer - causes more rising than Sophie Blake