ballinger 32 Posted May 9, 2009 Absolutely spot on refereeing decision. Walsek was on the white line and Pedersen was trying to lean all over him! Yes Walasek 'hits' him but only because Pedersen is trying to climb over him. Finally a referee with some bollocks. Just wound Sky+ back to see what the fuss is about, sorry chaps but IMO that's as bad a decision as Malilla last year from Mr Darago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob B 1,257 Posted May 9, 2009 Terrible decision. He did try to lean on Walasek but Walasek just rode straight and didn't turn. Terrible decision. Did you want Walasek to go over the kerb and onto the grass then, he was riding right on the inside! Pedersen has done it loads of times, he cuts across the rider on the inside makes sure there is contact and if he does come off the rider on the inside usually gets excluded. Did it to Crump at Leszno last year and twice at Cardiff last year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacques 3,114 Posted May 9, 2009 Absolutely spot on refereeing decision. Walsek was on the white line and Pedersen was trying to lean all over him! Yes Walasek 'hits' him but only because Pedersen is trying to climb over him. Finally a referee with some bollocks. Threw himself at him more like... Correct decision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
srbramble 0 Posted May 9, 2009 Terrible decision. He did try to lean on Walasek but Walasek just rode straight and didn't turn. Terrible decision. Pedesen wasn't in full control of his bike just before the contact. IMO, because of that, he lost the corner, and turned left on Walasek. Watch it again. Good decision by the ref. Get over it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghostwalker 1,859 Posted May 9, 2009 i'm with wanna here, sure Nicki tried to lean on Walsek but Walesek wasnt any better when he tried to push Nicki out and just went straigh ahead right into Nicki. IMO all 4 back would have been the most appropiate for first bend incidents like these especially with the lack of consitency from the ref's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IW08 3 Posted May 9, 2009 Scott Nicholls, the British number 1? not on this evidence Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghostwalker 1,859 Posted May 9, 2009 (edited) hey wow Greg does an interview in Swedish and he's really good at it! :D Edited May 9, 2009 by Ghostwalker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tigerblues 10 Posted May 9, 2009 all 4 back Unbelievable Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob B 1,257 Posted May 9, 2009 Very strange, can only presume the referee was pressing the button and they didn't go up before Jonsson went through them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghostwalker 1,859 Posted May 9, 2009 (edited) all 4 back yeah this ref is really weird allthough the ref claims technical error. but i dont know if it really was or if the ref screw up. *edit* i mean its easy to say afterwards that it was a technical error if he did screw up. Edited May 9, 2009 by Ghostwalker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
srbramble 0 Posted May 9, 2009 There just has to be a good explaination for it, but I can't think what it might be. Strangest decision of the night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UnitedUnitedUnited 0 Posted May 9, 2009 Unbelievable the worst ive ever seen I need the maths to be wrong, as I need rune to win to get me a load off money Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tomhaines 68 Posted May 9, 2009 Can someone confirm... is the tied places decided on heat wins/2nds/3rds or on when the riders met? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
