Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 15, 2010 I understand what your saying but, after he signed, Coventry had 24 EL matches left, of which he rode only 11 - not 9, not 10, not 12, not 13, but 11. It's that unique number that immediately makes people ask questions. Missing 54% of the matches must make him one of the most unreliable riders over here. I'm pretty sure there was 'a legitimate reason for him missing every meeting' but all the same, missing 13 out oif 24? You should'nt ask such questions. Coventry would never stoop so low as to fiddle the rules, would they? Its so obvious what has gone on it's undefendable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spock29 0 Posted October 15, 2010 You should'nt ask such questions. Coventry would never stoop so low as to fiddle the rules, would they? Its so obvious what has gone on it's undefendable. The Bees are Buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
williamfj 43 Posted October 15, 2010 Mods please lock this thread, it's run it's course, and that course was Shovlar whinging and moaning and looking for any reason for Poole's crushing defeat other than the Poole team themselves! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
javw 21 Posted October 15, 2010 Fair point Wolfie, enough is enough.Just going around in circles. Either a wind up or someone has got very serious problems! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Simon G 0 Posted October 15, 2010 Just lock Shovlar's account, make life on here much easier! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 15, 2010 Just lock Shovlar's account, make life on here much easier! Really? Because you don't like what I say? Don't you believe in other peoples opinion? Or if someone disagrees with yours just ban them? Coventry fans now trying to be the forum police! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Jasper 192 Posted October 15, 2010 Granted he would have missed a few, but he could easily have ridden more than 12. A Wolves fan posted a list of all the meetings he missed. Quite a few of them are unexplained. You take that as gospel? if thats the case it would go a fair way to explaining your nonsensical ramblings, actually thats point, do you ghostwrite Matt Ford's column? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
philfromcov 326 Posted October 15, 2010 Really? Because you don't like what I say? Don't you believe in other peoples opinion? Or if someone disagrees with yours just ban them? Coventry fans now trying to be the forum police! to re phrase footbal chants: Sit down shuit up yoooooooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuur ssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhuiiiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttttt aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh up the mighty bees! pugwash were pants pugwash will be pants pugwash will always be pants six seasons 1 title not great is it, not like the mighty bees with three Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,035 Posted October 15, 2010 Some of you are as bad as each other....Coventry didn't break any rules. They won fairly. Can't we just move on from this now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 15, 2010 Post now removed, poster warned. Surely your rant here is against the forum rules. Never heard of attack the post and not the poster? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfsbane 12,944 Posted October 15, 2010 Really? Because you don't like what I say?.... No Steve. Because you won't give a straight answer to a straight question. Ever considered Westminster? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) No Steve. Because you won't give a straight answer to a straight question. Ever considered Westminster? No obligation to answer anyone on here. Or is there a rule that I have to respond to a particular Coventry poster? I only responded to Colin Cooke because he completely over stepped the mark. Edited October 15, 2010 by Steve Shovlar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colincooke 0 Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) No obligation to answer anyone on here. Or is there a rule that I have to respond to a particular Coventry poster? I only responded to Colin Cooke because he completely over stepped the mark. but i speak the truth which is far more than we've heard from you. Answer the question that you are afraid of. I'm off to enjoy our celebration, bye ,bye loser. Edited October 15, 2010 by colincooke Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfsbane 12,944 Posted October 15, 2010 No obligation to answer anyone on here...... Totally agree Steve But the next time someone doesn't answer one of yours then........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted October 15, 2010 Totally agree Steve But the next time someone doesn't answer one of yours then........ I can happily live with it. Seems Colin Cooke isn't capable of a proper debate or difference of opinion but would rather go name calling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
