BluTiger 21,701 Posted August 19, 2015 Can't imagine the Bees team spirit is great tonight with Andersen trying to wipe out anyone he was on track with - and people call Nicki Pedersen dangerous!! The difference is Hans didn't do it on purpose 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whippy 100 Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) Firstly, I'm not a Coventry or Kings Lynn fan....... Heat 12 James Sargeant did not move before the tapes went up from his 15m handicap, so exclude Garrity for his move on the first corner, rerun with all 3, Garrity exc, Sargeant still off 15m... End of. You absolutely cannot exclude someone for a false start when the race has started, and after you've excluded a rider for a first bend incident! Absolute shocking decision..!! I was informed by a spectator that Sargeant dropped his clutch before tapes went up in re - run and that is why he was excluded, and was told that the decision was probably made after ref had looked at video replay as the exclusion didn't happen immediately. Hope this helps the confusion if that is what happened. don't shoot me I am only the messenger !!! Edited August 19, 2015 by whippy 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tellboy 3,662 Posted August 19, 2015 And using Lindgren for a rider who's not injured isn't? King's Lynn were made stronger tonight than they will be when they have Lambert & Milik back for play offs. King is a much better rider than Hans or Kus at King's Lynn and Garrity was already in pain so why would we withdraw King otherwise. Would you rather see him race and make it even worse. Whilst I agree about Milik,would you like to have seen him race and make his injury worse .King also managed to complete the meeting last night and even done ht 15. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) I was informed by a spectator that Sargeant dropped his clutch before tapes went up in re - run and that is why he was excluded and was told that the decision was probably made after ref had looked at video replay as the exclusion didn't happen immediately. Hope this helps the confusion if that is what happened. don't shoot me I am only the messenger !!! If that was the case he still couldn't exclude Garrity as he had deemed the race as an unsatisfactory start by excluding Sarjeant. However whichever angle they showed the replay from, at no time did it show Sarjeant jump the start. Edited August 19, 2015 by mdmc82 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CB252 1,376 Posted August 19, 2015 I was informed by a spectator that Sargeant dropped his clutch before tapes went up in re - run and that is why he was excluded and was told that the decision was probably made after ref had looked at video replay as the exclusion didn't happen immediately. Hope this helps the confusion if that is what happened. don't shoot me I am only the messenger !!! The problem is, the video replay suggested that the referee was wrong to exclude Sarjeant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) Whilst I agree about Milik,would you like to have seen him race and make his injury worse .King also managed to complete the meeting last night and even done ht 15. Thank you, that's what we are saying thay he aggregated the injury in tonight's meeting which is why he withdrew. I have only seen a couple of meetings from king's Lynn this year but noticed it has become very gate and go. Is it always like that as have seen more racing at Leicester this year than here? Edited August 19, 2015 by mdmc82 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tellboy 3,662 Posted August 19, 2015 Thank you, that's what we are saying thay he aggregated the injury in tonight's meeting which is why he withdrew. Milik looked fine in the SEC. Luckily for you he will be back IF you make the play offs. Milik did look fin,but he may have simply have done what King done tonight and aggravated it in Poland on Sunday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Woz01 3,589 Posted August 19, 2015 The 2 key moments was Harris losing it when a possible 5-1 was on the cards and that heat 12. Adam Ellis was extremely lucky to only get one warning after 2 jump starts and delaying a heat along with Garrity. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,824 Posted August 19, 2015 I was informed by a spectator that Sargeant dropped his clutch before tapes went up in re - run and that is why he was excluded, and was told that the decision was probably made after ref had looked at video replay as the exclusion didn't happen immediately. Hope this helps the confusion if that is what happened. don't shoot me I am only the messenger !!! This view won't go down well. You aren't allowed an opinion unless you disagree with the ref! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DizzAssStar 203 Posted August 19, 2015 The difference is Hans didn't do it on purpose Clearly you need a trip to Specsavers! Blatantly deliberate esp his move on Porsing .......... and you can make all the excuses you like about it being "just racing"............. good riders leave room to race! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wackie 938 Posted August 19, 2015 The difference is Hans didn't do it on purpose Really? I've seen him pull moves like he did tonight for years. If it's not intentional maybe it's time he called it a day as he's obviously not fully in control of the bike. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trees 2,814 Posted August 19, 2015 Was that Hans' first pass of the season?!That cut back, brilliant! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sommelier 1,118 Posted August 20, 2015 Just can't agree with Garrity being excluded, big gap left on inside, he didn't move off his racing line! 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BritPete 625 Posted August 20, 2015 I think that Coventry was unlucky last night, and that the meeting should be re-run with a proper referee, and the proper Kings Lynn team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sommelier 1,118 Posted August 20, 2015 I think that Coventry was unlucky last night, and that the meeting should be re-run with a proper referee, and the proper Kings Lynn team. Why should it be re-run?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
