Skidder1 7,637 Posted July 24, 2016 Not sure that proves any argument other than mine. Well done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heathen chemistry 660 Posted July 24, 2016 (edited) does it really hows that then? you can see from the fixtures poole had no matches planned home or away for 28 days - you can understand that carnt you? ALL other clubs had home or away fixtures in those 28 days.... so enlighten me how does it prove you right? i'll repeat it again becuse you seem a lttle slow as are others on the fact that poole had no fixtures at all for 28 days in june planned from beginning of the season, all other clubs had matches , if other clubs went a few weeks without home matches that was due to the weather , but they still had away matches.....nothing to do with the euro's as you try to imply Edited July 24, 2016 by heathen chemistry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Starman2006 2,355 Posted July 24, 2016 Not sure that proves any argument other than mine. Well done Don't respond to the child mate. He's just hanging out bait.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,637 Posted July 25, 2016 (edited) does it really hows that then? you can see from the fixtures poole had no matches planned home or away for 28 days - you can understand that carnt you? ALL other clubs had home or away fixtures in those 28 days.... so enlighten me how does it prove you right? i'll repeat it again becuse you seem a lttle slow as are others on the fact that poole had no fixtures at all for 28 days in june planned from beginning of the season, all other clubs had matches , if other clubs went a few weeks without home matches that was due to the weather , but they still had away matches.....nothing to do with the euro's as you try to imply We're talking mainly about home fixtures - you know that's where clubs take the majority of their income from - not away meetings!! If Poole had no away meetings it was because the home club did not want to risk a lesser crowd and reduced income than would normally be the case for a Poole visit, if there was a clash with the Euros!! As I've said before, something similar is likely to happen every other season (in the even numbered years) when there is either a Football World Cup, Euro Championship, Olympic Games in the same time zone etc etc. Edited July 25, 2016 by Skidder1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
damosuzuki 696 Posted July 25, 2016 At least you won't need to worry about clashing with England games going forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heathen chemistry 660 Posted July 25, 2016 We're talking mainly about home fixtures - you know that's where clubs take the majority of their income from - not away meetings!! If Poole had no away meetings it was because the home club did not want to risk a lesser crowd and reduced income than would normally be the case for a Poole visit, if there was a clash with the Euros!! As I've said before, something similar is likely to happen every other season (in the even numbered years) when there is either a Football World Cup, Euro Championship, Olympic Games in the same time zone etc etc. you seem to find it hard to understand that poole were the only club with no fixtures for 28 days in june all the other clubs had home or away matches , so your arguement about the euro's just doesnt work Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,637 Posted July 25, 2016 At least you won't need to worry about clashing with England games going forward. Not so!! Under the new Allardyce regime England are looking at a 'friendly on September 1st - the rearranged date for Poole v Belle Vue. Unlike the planned Poole v Leicester meeting on June 20th which didn't go ahead due to an England clash, the September 1st meeting should be one of the meetings of the season with a good crowd whatever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites