Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Beowulf

Rye House v Wolves 25.04.18

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, colin wood said:

I think the point Mark was making was that he'd rather see the rider who breaks the tapes go off 15m and not be replaced by a reserve.Not the reserve go off 15m lol!

But what if the rider who breaks the tapes is a reserve?

Heat 9 is the home team 3 & 4 and the away team 5 & 6.

If the away number 6 breaks the tapes then what do you do.? Mark says put them off 15 metres but that wouldnt be fair as chances are the reserve would never catch up. There would be exceptions , Bewley being one of those. Yet in the same heat if the home number 3 breaks the tapes he could in all theory catch the number 6 of the away side off of 15 metres.

Cant see how you can just have the rule that all riders go off of 15 metres.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mark said:

I can't be bothered , it's simple as that.    Nothing to do with strife. 

Correct.  Thank you.    Unfortunately Bwitcher didn't understand my point.    No point me continuing the discussion.

You haven't had a point from the beginning.

You've decided after 70 odd years of league speedway that suddenly the team with the best reserve will win the league. It's garbage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Gavan said:

But what if the rider who breaks the tapes is a reserve?

Heat 9 is the home team 3 & 4 and the away team 5 & 6.

If the away number 6 breaks the tapes then what do you do.? Mark says put them off 15 metres but that wouldnt be fair as chances are the reserve would never catch up. There would be exceptions , Bewley being one of those. Yet in the same heat if the home number 3 breaks the tapes he could in all theory catch the number 6 of the away side off of 15 metres.

Cant see how you can just have the rule that all riders go off of 15 metres.

My point is a simple one.     If a rider breaks the tapes why should the team manager have an easy option of putting another (reserve) rider in his place.    This reserve, and he has the choice of two in most races, could be a better option for a rider who is out of form.     It's open to abuse by deliberately breaking the tapes too.

If a rider brakes the tapes he is trying to gain an advantage over the three other riders in his heat.   Penalise him by putting him off 15 metres.  No reserve replacement allowed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BWitcher said:

You haven't had a point from the beginning.

You've decided after 70 odd years of league speedway that suddenly the team with the best reserve will win the league. It's garbage.

There is a point but you fail to grasp it.    

Edited by Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mark said:

My point is a simple one.     If a rider breaks the tapes why should the team manager have an easy option of putting another (reserve) rider in his place.    This reserve, and he has the choice of two in most races, could be a better option for a rider who is out of form.     It's open to abuse by deliberately breaking the tapes too.

If a rider brakes the tapes he is trying to gain an advantage over the three other riders in his heat.   Penalise him by putting him off 15 metres.  No reserve replacement allowed.

 

I'm afraid the part in bold shows you really don't understand. There is nothing 'open to abuse' as the rider could have just been replaced anyway.

 

Edited by BWitcher
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BWitcher said:

I'm afraid the part in bold shows you really don't understand. There is nothing 'open to abuse' as the rider could have just been replaced anyway.

 

If you say so.  Bye.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mark said:

If you say so.  Bye.

Yes I do say so. 

Now an adult answer would have been, "I didn't realise that, thanks for pointing it out."

The child storms off in a huff.

Edited to add: Actually that's unfair on kids....

Edited by BWitcher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mark said:

If you say so.  Bye.

He is correct though. You could have replaced the rider anyway, regardless of whether or not he broke the tapes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mark said:

My point is a simple one.     If a rider breaks the tapes why should the team manager have an easy option of putting another (reserve) rider in his place.    This reserve, and he has the choice of two in most races, could be a better option for a rider who is out of form.     It's open to abuse by deliberately breaking the tapes too.

If a rider brakes the tapes he is trying to gain an advantage over the three other riders in his heat.   Penalise him by putting him off 15 metres.  No reserve replacement allowed.

 

So why get a rider to break the tapes? Just replace the rider with the reserve in the first place. 

And again what would you do in the scenario i mentioned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The crux of his point is, he doesn't think reserve changes should be allowed under any circumstance.

I fail to see any benefit whatsoever to this idea, it hasn't been an issue in the past 60+ years of the sport and it isn't one now. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is breaking the tapes classed as a ride. If so in certain circumstances a rider off form may be told to do it in order to fulfil his quota as the the reserve couldn't automatically replace him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, BWitcher said:

Yes I do say so. 

Now an adult answer would have been, "I didn't realise that, thanks for pointing it out."

The child storms off in a huff.

Edited to add: Actually that's unfair on kids....

I couldn't care less if your right of wrong.    I'm not a kid who goes off in a huff, just bored, got some paint I need to watch dry.     I know you'll reply to this as your desperate to have the last word.     Try not to reply, see if you can resist, self discipline is good..

Edited by Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Call me wolfie said:

Is breaking the tapes classed as a ride. If so in certain circumstances a rider off form may be told to do it in order to fulfil his quota as the the reserve couldn't automatically replace him

No it isn't, otherwise some No 7's would be breaking tapes in all their heats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Call me wolfie said:

Is breaking the tapes classed as a ride. If so in certain circumstances a rider off form may be told to do it in order to fulfil his quota as the the reserve couldn't automatically replace him

It only counts as a ride if he either goes off 15metres or isn't replaced and doesn't take part in the heat and is therefore declared as a 'non starter' which counts as a ride.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy