Correct.

Always good for a laugh the "SCB" you could not make it up , they were incompetent when I attended speedway and haven't improved.    Their grammatically incorrect statement  shows the completely amateur disorganised shower that are allegedly controlling the sport.   "The SCB Referee at the Kent fixture had been informed that Mr Foord was unavailable for this fixture and having consulted the SCB had at that time had correctly allowed a facility, however on further investigation this should not have been authorised and the score of the guest for Cooper Rushen will be deleted from the meeting result."  So referee consulted the SCB and they had allowed the facility. (they repeated HAD twice for avoidance of doubt !)  "on further investigation" they changed their mind ! you cannot do that !!! amateur hour !!!  the score of the guest for Cooper Rushen  ???? what ???? I thought Cooper Rushen was THE guest rider ??           

This 100%. And in this case it would make score 43-44 or 43-45 (depending in whether Crewe could be lapped by a non-existant rider)

Poole should be able to beat Redcar whoever is in the Bears team. 

That makes zero sense. There would be no point doing that. And when they report it off due to the forecast to you really think no one checks it at the time? If Poole really wanted it off they could have just left the hose on like BV did that time when Zagar missed a flight.  Next time take the second leg. 

Wow... Poole messed up the chance to race yet again against a weakened side using a guest !!!! No wonder Dan isn't happy.  Will their luck hold in the rearranged fixture ?  p.off fixtures are usually a lottery dependent on the depth of mud.