foreverblue

No i am not superior at all but just because i think you should spell a riders name correctly so it is not confused with another rider who sadly is no longer with us doesn't mean you should lower yourself to calling me names.

Rickardsson was better in my opinion, i loved watching Gollob too especially at his home track.

If you are going refer to someone by name you should at least spell his name correctly.

Nothing to do with blue tinted glasses just a little joke not taking the piss, given me the benefit of the doubt how gracious of you!

I don't back as some on here, i didn't see Fundin, Mauger, Collins etc, i did see Neilsen and remember him saying his knew he was in trouble when Rickardsson was behind him, they couldn't stand being beaten by one another. Loram was amazing to watch but i have to say Rickardsson was a different level to anyone i have seen on a bike probably typified by his wall of death ride at Cardiiff.

At least you could spell his name right even if you are not a big fan of his!

Yep and anyone could have signed the two poles

The issue we Poole fans have is that it always seems to be Poole who are slated for using the rules to their advantage because I don't remember many saying last season that it was wrong to bring in Musielak on a previous average that wasn't relevant to his form. On the other hand if the riders Poole have brought in were re-assessed it wouldn't be worth the risk of using them.

We always struggle at Wolves, the only times we haven't is when Wolves have had injuries. I think Wolves will struggle this season unless there are changes. Poole's team looks strong but if one of the Poles got injured early on we would struggle to replace the rider with a reasonable alternative whereas if that same rider got injured later in the season his average should have gone up enough to get a comparable rider.

As with any team its not the team you start with that counts its the team you finish with and it would be very unusual for most championship winners to have the same team from start to finish of the season.

Obviously mistaken about Josh G but Wolves have a weak bottom 3 and at Poole they should get hammered but at Monmore probably get beaten we usually do but certainly fancy our chances over two legs.

Holder is always bad at Wolves but I think Josh G is ok there so who knows what to expect, just they all have to appreciate none of them will beat Thorsell.

Personally Steve i think Brady improved at the smaller tracks last season, obviously the Poles may struggle but one of them is at reserve how difficult can that be even at Wolves and they have ridden here before which will help.

Yes i did think KK would be good but potentially with or without KK this team is much stronger in nearly every department. That said it may take a few meetings to gel but it going to be exciting.

No it looks much better than last year. I don't remember saying last year's team was title winning considering the changes we made amazing we made the play offs, theres a world of difference between the teams

Praised us!! Condescending comments its a good team then saying its no better than last year's haha!! It is miles better you know it just won't admit it.

No better than last year haha!! this years team looks amazing.

Difference is we don't have KK.

I would agree but probably Sundstrom has more potential to improve his average and now confirmed that we can proceed with signing him now they have lifted the 3 league rule.

Yep he did my opologies.

Of course winning is important, not saying it is everything. Most people will except the odd loss but if you lose regularly crowds drop.

With punctuation in the correct places and spelling corrected I think it would make sense!

It isn't very entertaining being beaten every week! Crowds tend to dwindle when your not winning.

No fair enough he wasn't wrong on the Thorsell point but he was wrong on the Ellis point.

That's the second fact Gavan's got wrong on one page! He said earlier we dumped Ellis after he helped us win the league!