szkocjasid

Peterborough is a very different track to Plymouth

Is it worth giving Bellego another chance instead of Ellis?

It's possible I read the same person commenting about Boughen many many times & just assumed it was a multitude of people "knowing" he was going to Glasgow?

I certainly wouldn't have signed Wojdylo ahead of the Plymouth fixture. Likely to be stronger using r/r

Don't trust Plymouth's posts, they had Gilkes down to race at Glasgow when everyone knew he was racing in SON2

While it's possible they're looking to replace Ellis, if he had been dropped you'd think he'd be going hell for leather to show other clubs what's he's capable of?

Dropping Pickering & Ellis to keep Woffy when Holder returns, leaves 2.87, I'm sure the minimum Prem ave is 3.00? 1 Holder (8.91) 2 Kerr (5.73) 3 Woffinden (7.03) 4 Howarth (5.75) 5 Museliak (8.71) 6 Remaining (2.87) 7 Gilkes (RS)

Maybe Holder's not coming back. But looking at the figures dropping Ellis & Pickering to bring back Holder & a 3.00 reserve, is still over the limit!

They could do whatever if it fits under 39. Holder for Woffinden is the only change that doesn't have to come in under the points limit.

I can't believe I noticed & read comments about someone making that mistake, then made the exact same mistake lol!

How where are all the people who were convinced Boughen was going to Glasgow?

Drop Morris & Nielsen & Birmingham could run with this squad lol! Robert Lambert 11.72 Troy Batchelor 7.45 Justin Sedgmen 6.94 Alfie Bowtell 4.93 Paul Starke 4.55 Sam Hagon 2.00 Luke Killeen 2.00 Maybe Niels K Iversen, or Jaimon Lidsey would be more realistic though?

Gotta say I'm surprised Oxford dropped Killeen. Boughen is obviously one for the future, but is he any better now? If he's signed as an asset can understand it though.

That is the crux of many fans frustrations, as we can't understand why they were allowed to cancel a match because they couldn't find ONE guest? Now if Laguta wasn't available, why wasn't that announced as the reason? Otherwise fans have no reason to believe he wouldn't be there (as he wasn't injured). The lack of transparency from Lynn / BSPL is the biggest issue.

Why do Lynn get to demand a suitable replacement or they won't race? If Laguta walked out on them and they can't get a Champ heat leader as a guest, then get a Champ second string instead. No reason for them to be allowed to call off the match imo. Especially if it means other teams can do the exact same thing from now to eternity

Keeping faith with the current 7?

I make that 40.66, above the points limit. 1 Holder (8.91) 2 Kerr (5.73) 3 Woffinden (7.03) 4 Howarth (5.75) 5 Museliak (8.71) 6 Mountain (4.53)

I'm not sure it does, when was the last time an 8+ heat leader couldn't get a team spot because his average was too high? I'd say it allows his team to be stronger (gets extra matches). For riders on 4-6 point averages, I can totally see how it would help them get a team spot the following season.

Nope, Glasgow are well over the points limit.

It almost seems Premiership sides can do that i.e Pearson, but Championship clubs can't (once riders race 8 matches they become an asset).

No chance, would have to make a multitude of changes & would certainly lose their strong reserve

Tbh now (some) riders are slowing up to avoid race wins, it makes sense to include bonus points again, apart from fairness also for safety, as a rider shutting off before the line could cause a collision.

I'm not sure it's Plymouth's decision not to use a guest for Barker, in the last couple of weeks Berwick, Edinburgh & Redcar have all used r/r for heat leaders as they've not been able to get any guests

So these rules mean when Rew had a 5.00 assessed Prem average, he'd be available on a 5.00 ave in the Champ? But when his Prem ave dropped to 4.00, his Champ ave would rise to 6.00? Can someone explain the logic of that?

Especially useful if the spare points allowed them to sign a 10+ rider for Morris