Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

szkocjasid

Members
  • Posts

    9,182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by szkocjasid

  1. I don't understand the BSPL's attitude towards the NL / Nora / Mildenhall / Kent either. I can only assume they are absolutely positive they know what's best for Speedway & if clubs don't toe the line, they are happy for them to disappear. Certainly makes no sense to me, it's as if they are oblivious to the problems with Speedway in the UK & think everything is all peachy (that they won't miss Mildenhall & Kent)?
  2. I partly agree with that, but also feel if they said to the other 6 Prem teams, we'll join up for the league only, they'd have bitten their hands off for a 7th team.
  3. I agree, which I why I said a "weak" signing, it's not a gamble if you sign the best available remaining rider, which could be Joe?
  4. I wouldn't call it a huge gamble, just a weak signing (sorry Joe)
  5. You've confused me, do you mean Champ spot? If Dan T wanted to race for Leicester, I would have had him in a heartbeat, maybe he wanted to be loyal to Ipswich after Leicester dropped him?
  6. Kerr has a higher Prem & Champ average than MPT, who is surely Lynn's 6th best rider?
  7. That makes zero sense to me, they could very easily race either one of the teams seeded to the semi finals. However I have no issue whatsoever with them sitting out the KOC as they are competing in 3 leagues.
  8. Why are the Pawlicki's being called has beens? Maybe they are not at their peak (former GP riders) but they're still Extraliga riders & you don't get to race in that league without a hell of a lot of talent.
  9. Hope not. Birmingham could really do with a rider who is willing to turn up at every match. That being said, maybe it's cheaper to use Laguta, use him at home to get a big crowd, then he can sit out away matches with Brummies using a cheaper guest?
  10. Janowski must have a re-assesed average (don't know why) but these things are kept secret from fans (don't know why)
  11. Looks a good team to me, can't agree with the very odd poster who thinks it looks poor. Great number one, solid throughout & possibly the best reserve in the league. Bringing riders back to the UK, using 4 Brits, what's not to like? Ok one thing, that there is only ONE Spire / Cheetah doubling up is odd to me.
  12. That's not really the case, Lambert could have replaced any of the Lynn team. It's just that they wanted to have a 5 point reserve, Lambert isn't strong enough to make the team. Had they run with a 4.00 reserve (just under the limit) then yes, I'd agree he was "too good" last year.
  13. Don't be daft, that "5 year plan" only lasted one year in the Championship. Credit to the Prem for keeping it.
  14. You don't have to include an RS at reserve, but Harrison would be a decent signing at number 7 (for Scunthorpe, Redcar or Workington).
  15. I don't think Lundgren would reach a 9.3 average, but it would certainly be better to sign him than go with a 7 point number one.
  16. Sounds like the rules regarding eligibility have changed, but nothing has been announced officially (no surprise there). Guess 4.01 must be the cut-off if Flint (4.00) can be a RS but Kemp (4.04) can't.
  17. Looks a good team to me, Lewis Kerr should be a strong reserve.
  18. What if Oxford went for Dillon Ruml instead of Heeps. Heeps was only preferred to Ruml because of the limit last year, so does it count as loyalty, giving Ruml another go? Obviously I don't know if they asked, or if he wants to come back to the UK.
  19. Think they have made a howler there, there's gotta be a stronger option than Heeps with a point to spare, so couldn't believe they'd stick with him. Reminds me of Lynn & Ipswich, these teams have good looking squads, but could've been even stronger if using up the available points.
  20. If Jenkins is no longer eligible to be a rising star, then he'd be due a 25% reduction and signs on a 3.16 average. That would mean a change to the RS eligibility, but I haven't seen anything announced about that?
  21. Don't think clubs or riders can afford to hold grudges, not enough riders / teams to go around for either to be
  22. Decent looking team, should do better than last year (won't be hard) certainly got a good number one & a decent reserve (plus a good RS). Can't help but think they could've been even better with a stronger rider in place of MPT. Yes I've read comments about riders agreeing, then changing their minds, but without reading anything official, can only comment on the signed riders.
  23. Can't see Iversen adding to his average. In a stronger league, he will have done well if he keeps his average imo. Still a decent second string on his current average though. Similar thoughts with Tarasenko, looks like there will be plenty of strong top 2s so Vadim will struggle to up his average imo.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy