norbold

Interview with Brenda Craven In Howard Jones's book, "Belle Vue Aces Hyde Road Special": "Howard Jones: Rumours suggest Brenda that 1963 may well have been his last season. Is that right? Brenda Craven: Yes, I think it possibly might have been. He was always talking about it at the time, although he may well have ridden one more season in 1964."

From Brian Burford's book, "Peter Craven The Wizard of Balance": "In what would prove to be his final season, Peter Craven seemed to be riding as well as ever. However, it was said that Peter wasn't very happy with the reduced number of meetings at Belle Vue, and he was considering a move. In the issue of Speedway Star dated 13 April, it says that Craven wanted a move because there were only scheduled to be twenty home meetings for club riders that year. In the following week's issue, Frank MacLean reported that the Aces' management had turned down his request. Norwich were said to be keen to engage his services if he did decide to leave the famous club. "Although Peter began the season with the Aces, the transfer saga eventually went into arbitration. A court of arbitration met in London where they heard the points of view expressed by both the Aces' manager Ken Sharples, and the rider. The court then ruled that it wasn't in the best interests of speedway that PC's request for a move south was granted. "There was also talk that he had planned to make the 1963 season his final one, and one source - who was close to Peter - revealed that it was felt he would make it his last year. After all, what was there to prove? "Talk of his possible retirement is given credibility when Brenda confirmed reports that he had been in negotiations with Charlie Oates about possibly buying his business from him.....John Gibson, who was a sports journalist for the local Edinburgh paper, said that Peter had confided in him when he was in the pits during that fateful night at the Old Meadowbank Stadium that he was considering buying a motorcycle business in the Lancashire area......The Manchester Evening News sports journalist, Duncan Measor, also said that Peter had confided in him that he was considering his future., "I believe that in a year or two I will have to think about another job. I never want to go on until I am a has-been", he told Measor."

The sadly missed speedway historian, Keith Farman, who was an absolutely devoted Ove Fundin fan, made a comprehensive study of all Ove's races. He found that although Fundin beat all his main rivals more times than they beat him, Craven was the one who beat him the most times.

Sorry, anecdote alert! Your link also shows all the BH winners as well. Some years ago, when I was writing my Speedway in the South East book, I interviewed Wally Green, who had ridden for Hastings in 1948. I asked him how he felt winning the Bronze Helmet from Bert Roger at his own track of Exeter. He told me he had never won the Bronze Helmet. I tried to assure him he had but he absolutely refused to believe me. When I saw him again, I took a copy of Speedway World to show him he had definitely won it. He said he had no recollection of it at all! So, I wasn't able to get a scoop on how he felt to put in my book!!! Mind you, I suppose finishing runner-up in the World Championship Final in 1950 does put the Bronze Helmet victory into the shade a bit!

Another second division rider, Bob Leverenz, also qualified for the 1951 final, finishing 8th, while Geoff Mardon, a third division rider, qualified as reserve.

In 1951, Jack Young began the year as holder of the Silver Helmet and then went on to defend it against Arthur Forrest, Derek Close, Bob Leverenz before losing it to Tommy Miller.

I don't think he beat Jack Parker. He won it from Ronnie Moore in 1952 and then held it against Moore, Freddie Williams and Split Waterman. He later won it again in 1955 when he won by default against Ronnie Moore, who was injured. He was then injured himself and didn't defend it.

Incidentally, just as an observation....Those were the days, eh, when you could get two meetings in successive weeks at a track featuring the top riders in the world in individual competition? I think we all know the chances of anything like that happening at a British track today!

Briggo wasn't great round New Cross. Of course, he was very good and was New Cross's top rider but, apart from 1959, when he didn't ride in England apart from a couple of meetings at the end of the season including the World Championship Final, I think it was just about his worst year in Britain. Fundin and Moore were far better round New Cross. It was the first time his average dropped below 10 points per match since 1954. It was also the only year between 1956 and 1966 that he was ranked outside the Top Five in the end of year Speedway Star rankings. I would agree, Sidney. Notwithstanding Fred Williams's success in 1953, I would say that Jack Young was the dominant rider in the world from 1951-1954 when Ronnie Moore rose to stardom.

He beat Moore, Knutson, Briggs and Craven in the Tom Farndon Memorial meeting. The week before he beat Fundin, Moore and Briggs in the King of the South Cup. So over those two weeks he beat all five of the "Big Five", including Moore and Briggs twice.

Funnily enough, iris, I have that same problem with Peter Craven! I first went to speedway in 1960 at New Cross and there is no doubt that Fundin was the outstanding master of the Frying Pan; Moore was also excellent there and Briggo actually rode for New Cross in 1960. Craven always seemed to me to be some way behind those three. In fact I think Jack Young rode New Cross better than he did, even though he was past his best. It always seemed to me that Craven couldn't quite master such a small track and it did actually colour my view of him.

Just another comparison. Fred Williams was never ranked higher than no. 4 in the World in Stenner's end of year rankings, a position he achieved twice. Peter Craven was ranked no. 2 once, no. 3 four times and fourth once in the successor Speedway Star end of year rankings . This in a period, as Sidney points out, included Fundin. Moore, Briggs and Knutson.

They're not consecutive. The first was from speedyguy, the next was from gustix.

I wasn't criticising, merely making an observation and asking a question. Anyway, your record has now been broken by Chunky!

Well done, Chunky. You've broken Gustix's record.

Sportspages no longer exists but it was where most of my London books sold when it came out. Mark Loram went in there one day not long after it was published and signed a number of copies quite unbeknown to me!

Yes. I also think there is a difference between the sort of history books I wrote and a book by Tai Woffinden. Because a lot of people "used to go" to speedway and that's why my East Anglia book sold so well in Norwich and my London book in London as people there could wallow in a bit of nostalgia and read about their heroes and relive their younger days when they "used to go" to speedway. I guess to most people, even former speedway supporters, a book about Tai Woffinden would actually mean very little.

When I first spoke to my publisher about producing a speedway book, I said I wanted to write one about Speedway in London. They asked me how many tracks were still open in London and I told them there weren't any, so they said they didn't think they would be able to sell it as they thought that a niche" book about speedway would only sell at speedway track shops. So we agreed that I should write "Speedway in East Anglia" instead as there were four tracks still open. They printed 1200 copies and sold out within two weeks and then sold a further 1200 in just about a month. What amazed them was that most of the sales were in "High Street" bookshops in Norwich where the track had long since closed. They then agreed to my Speedway in London book, which reached no.3 in the Sunday Times Sports Books chart. The moral is you don't need to be a bookshop near a track to sell books about speedway!

Just over 10 years. Is that the record for the longest gap between two consecutive posts on the same thread?

A number of people on here are doubting whether Greg Hancock should be given a wildcard next year by pointing to the fact that Tai missed out on a couple of GPs and racing in general for a while and hasn't been able to reach his former best and that therefore Greg, who has missed out on a whole year, couldn't be expected to get back to GP form. I do think there is one crucial difference in this though and that is that Tai was out injured with a bad injury and may have come back too soon. Greg has suffered no actual bodily injury and therefore will not be in the same position as Tai. Personally, I don't see how Greg can not be given a Wild Card for next year, given his record overall and especially considering where he finished in 2018.

Dennis

Yes, I have the programme. Les Trim won; 2nd C Anderson; 3rd A V Sweby I also have an unfilled programme for 01/09 A V Sweby's Team v. D Gray's Team, so can't confirm it actually took place.

Yes, he did say he would like a wild card for next year.

Do you think it's worth writing to the editor of Stenner's and tell him he's made a mistake!?

Sorry, you were too fast for me. I did delete my second paragraph when I realised what you'd written before!