-
Posts
1,433 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by Roger Jacobs
-
Wolves v Ipswich Monday May 9th
Roger Jacobs replied to racers and royals's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
And a no-lose for the home team, who are guaranteed a point, but could get three - while the away team, after earning two points for a draw could end up with only one thanks to the stupid additional race -
Sheffield vs Peterborough 5/5/22
Roger Jacobs replied to Gasser90's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
SpeedwayGB on FaceBook has posted Heat 7, by CleanCut ... -
Ipswich v Belle Vue 5th May
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
The Aces haven't broken any Regulations. No idea why you think they're throwing averages? Fricke has a poor record at Foxhall. If the Regs allowed some flexibility, team managers could actually set their teams up for the tracks they are visiting. Just because Fricke is #1 in the averages, doesn't mean he's the ideal #1 at every track. -
Ipswich v Belle Vue 5th May
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Not sure if Zagar has ridden on the remodelled track? -
Ipswich v Belle Vue 5th May
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Except of course Heeps' average is higher Allen is available, if needed -
Unless I've missed a match or two in the fixture list, I make it that (without postponements), the 15th & 16th matches take place on Thursday, 2nd June. At that stage the teams will have ridden: Home Matches Away Matches Total Matches Belle Vue 2 4 6 Ipswich 4 1 5 King's Lynn 3 3 6 Peterborough 2 3 5 Sheffield 2 2 4 Wolverhampton 3 3 6
-
Ipswich v Belle Vue 5th May
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
While Batchelor and Heeps conceded 2 x 5-1, so it was a marginal gain. I agree with King being moved from 5, and Batchelor is the only option - I don't think a King/Batchelor pairing at 3&4 would work any better than Barker/King. King has escaped scrutiny so far, but has an inconsistent record in Heat 13 (and 15). A poor performance at Plymouth last night too, where he has normally ridden well. -
"A Premiership Transfer Window opens after 25% of the League fixtures are complete and closes when 75% of League fixtures are complete. This permits changes to the team on 2 occasions, except for proven long term injury." So ... given that I haven't read every single reply ... is that 25% of all League fixtures or 25% of each team's League fixtures? Either way, the % works differently for each team, depending on matches completed (home/away and postponements). Another rule that's not thought through. If it's 25% of all League fixtures, has anyone worked out the current scheduled date?
-
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
You are of course correct, under "012.4.4 Tactical Substitute (TS)" in the Regs. -
Newcastle vs Berwick SGB Championship 1 May 4pm
Roger Jacobs replied to StevePark's topic in SGB Championship League Speedway
Blimey! The dust has hardly settled on this match. If you want to check on possible guest options, the current Green Sheets are available on the BSPA's web page. -
Newcastle vs Berwick SGB Championship 1 May 4pm
Roger Jacobs replied to StevePark's topic in SGB Championship League Speedway
If anyone has the race times please, the Speedway Updates team needs them to complete the record of the match. Thanks. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Only the #7 is protected - the #6 can replace the #2. Indeed, it's not clear if a T/S can or can't be used for the #2. I've asked the SCB and BSPL why the regulation is hidden under: "012.6 RACE FORMATS 012.6.1 15 Heats In all Premiership Team competitions the #7 is protected in heats 2 and 8 and no replacements are permitted unless injured and confirmed in writing by the MO" -
But is it 25% of all fixtures, or 25% of each team's fixtures? The fixture list is so patchy (without including postponements), 25% overall means some teams will have had less matches than others. By the same token, 25% for each team (without including postponements) means different times depending on when they complete their 25% ...
-
I did get the irony. My quote was directly from a dictionary (italics included). Football has Laws, which, in theory, cannot be broken. Speedway has Regs, many of which are vague, and often seem to be stretched in the interests of the BSPL/Sport (delete as inappropriate).
-
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
"Racing Doyle"?! They are team mates. The whole point of that pairing, no matter how strange it seemed, was that they would score heat advantages - which they did. Riss also covered Heat 8. The big question is will they risk Heeps at 2 for the match against Belle Vue ... if they do, and he fails to race Doyle (LOL!), at least Starke will be available to cover Heat 8. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
The point I made is that if you stage the match again with the *same* line-ups you would get a different result. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
That's the whole point. Some fans saying, if, if, if - it applies to both teams. Lawson normally rides very well at Foxhall, scored 3! -
"Regulation is the controlling of an activity or process, usually by means of rules."
-
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Another night, on a different track. In fact, stage the Witches v Stars at Foxhall again with the same line-ups, and you'll get a different result. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
The only gate choice in league racing is Heat 15, and riders such as King and Batchelor are experienced enough to deal with whatever gate they agree with Doyle. The main thing is for them to have a plan for likely first bend scenarios. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Indeed - thought I'd let people work that out - can't spoon feed everyone Heeps is bound to be given more chances ... after all, he's only just returned from the illness break. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
But none of his interviews ever say anything specific. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that Rider X is struggling, and e.g. he's getting help with machinery or advice about the track. There is a lack of meaningful content in Press releases. -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Klindt is 7.43 - the Green Sheet as used by Ipswich when he was originally named in the team last season: https://britishspeedway.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/p21_issue_1.pdf -
Ipswich v Lynn 28/4 LC
Roger Jacobs replied to Arch Stanton's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
I don't think they'll be in attendance, unless of course they are still undecided and it's another poor performance? I'll be fast asleep. -
King's Lynn v Ipswich. League Cup 25/4/22
Roger Jacobs replied to Bald Bloke's topic in SGB Premiership Speedway League
I said "if". Even you reckon they scored pretty well for an away meeting. Maybe they scored pretty well for an Ipswich away meeting ... but that just reflects a complete lack of ambition. There's no spark, or even vitality - the whole aura of the club is one that's just going through the motions.