BackInTheDHSS

Careful. Toady will argue with you next…

I’ve already addressed your Cook for Kerr narrative. You say that’s not the case, so fair enough, I will respect that. Not sure you’re telling the truth, but I haven’t tried to force it like you are doing with Harris, so stop going on about it. My change at any cost agenda is not quite as extreme as you’re saying, but is also fair in some points. I’ve admitted it and I stick by it, but only if the right riders can come in. I have never said anything different, so what’s your point? Finally, for some reason, you are trying to claim I have a Harris agenda. I don’t, I’ve said so, and have never once claimed to have one - so why are you continuing to go on about it? Have you run out of other Oxford fans to argue with?

I singled out Harris? Haha. You mentioned him and I responded, using Harris as an example. It's not hard to go back and look at previous posts before you spout this agenda nonsense. You're fixated with him!

You must have missed the bit where I said I'd like to keep Chris Harris. It's just before the bit that you put in bold. What a clown! I've no issue with Harris. I'd swap out whoever works with the averages, be that Harris, Wright, Janowski, etc. Oxford should be making the most of the points they have available to improve the team - if there's a rider(s) who want to actually come.

But he's one of the best Italians isn't he? Or should Italy just give up all their spots? There are plenty worse than Paco in the qualifiers. More a question of whether the format of that is right in my opinion. Can't blame him for trying.

Has he said he 'thinks' he should be? Or is he just trying to qualify?

When Craig Cook was in the side, you clearly said you were happy and didn't want any changes. So either, so you didn't care about Lewis Kerr coming back, or you wanted an eight-man team. Which was it?

I don't recall saying Chris Harris should go. Can you show me where I said that please? I said I wanted changes, and still do. Would I like to keep Chris Harris, yes. But would I swap Chris Harris for Robert Lambert, etc., yes. Perhaps this is a topic for the Spires thread, however.

As much as I hate to say it, they are probably the most disliked team due to their success. Not because of the nonsense you’re pointing out.

But I'm certainly not a Poole fan!

Some pretty positive results in the BSN Series perhaps? It was a good start to the season, and I certainly thought Edinburgh had improved. A draw with Glasgow and you're in the semi-finals, which is more than can be said of Oxford.

No...they have 2.

Two riders got injured, but this thread has been turned into a farce. Trackrat exists solely to wind up the Poole fans, and all the Poole fans keep biting. It'll never end.

Oxford have 2.

Possibly didn't understand his agenda, but all very valid points.

Ha ha. He was talking about loyalty in regards to Lewis Kerr, someone you were happy to kick to the curb!

Oxford win, but it won't be a thrashing. 50-40.

What exactly are you looking for? A big pat on the back? Some people great predictions right, and some get them wrong...that's why they are predictions. Nobody can see into the future.

Don't think this is happening. Seems like Cook will remain, Kerr goes and everything else stays the same. Toady will be pleased.

As the saying goes, 'don't try and reason with an idiot'. Lesson learned. I'll let you get back to drinking.

1) I never went week in week out. 2) I never went with the intention of supporting the opposition of Swindon. I went with the sole purpose of watching some speedway. But I never ‘converted’ to becoming a Swindon fan just because they were now my local club. They had been Oxford’s rivals for years, so I naturally didn’t want them to win. Some people find that weird. Go figure? i thought the above two points were abundantly clear from previous posts.

Sigh... well done for letting it go. You suggested a different alternative to something szkocjasid said directly to me. It therefore makes you culpable. Deal with it....I'm trying to.

So you wouldn't care if Birmingham folded? I find that incredibly strange that you therefore care so much when they do exist. Let's hope there are other Birmingham fans who would be more interested in saving the club. And you calling me immature for no reason and completely unprovoked isn't victimising someone? It's not what the world is coming to, it's simple English, and the correct use of the word. Anyway, as you're happy for me to have the last word and I presume you won't be responding, let's try and get this thread back on track. Did anybody else notice that Peter Schroeck seemed particularly uncomfortable when asked about Lewis Kerr's return at the Chargers match on Sunday? Almost like he didn't want to answer the question. Seemed to me like Kerr won't be coming back.

Spelling mistakes are exactly that....mistakes. At the end of the day I was interested in what makes you so passionate about Birmingham, but so happy to let them go as soon as they had gone (let's hope that never happens). But you didn't want to answer, which says a lot. You seem to have victimised me because I still stood by and supported Oxford after they left, I was an active member in trying to help them return and I didn't switch to supporting Swindon as a result. At least other people I have disagreed with have been civilised and not resorted to calling me immature because of this. Arnieg took offence, but I'm not sure we fully understood each others' points correctly - I've always had a lot of respect for him and I still don't think we resorted to being unkind as far as I can tell.

The question marks are a give away. They usual are.