Subedei

But here's the result from the re-scheduled meeting: Simon Cross..2,3,3,3,2 = 13 Kelvin Tatum..3,1,3,3,3 = 13 Simon Wigg..3,2,3,3,2 = 13 Chris Morton..2,2,3,2,3 = 12 Marvyn Cox..3,0,1,3,3 = 10 Mitch Shirra..3,1,2,1,3 = 10 Richard Knight..0,3,2,2,1 = 8 Sam Ermolenko..0,3,2,2,F = 7 John Davis..2,2,1,1,1 = 7 Andy Smith..1,3,1,0,1 = 6 Mike Faria..1,2,1,0,2 = 6 Robert Pfetzing..1,0,F,2,2 = 5 Rick Miller..0,1,2,0,1 = 4 Bobby Schwartz..2,0,0,1,0 = 3 Neil Evitts..1,1,F,1,0 = 3 Craig Hodgson..0,0,0,0,0 = 0 Ht 1..Shirra, Morton, Evitts, Knight..63.2 Ht 2..Wigg, Cross, Pfetzing, Ermolenko..62.6 Ht 3..Tatum, Schwatrz, Faria, Hodgson..62.7 Ht 4..Cox, Davis, Smith, Miller..63.6 Ht 5..Ermolenko, Davis, Evitts, Schwartz..63.4 Ht 6..Cross, Morton, Tatum, Cox..63.1 Ht 7..Smith, Faria, Shirra, Pfetzing..64.0 Ht 8..Knight, Wigg, Miller, Hodgson..68.1 Ht 9..(Re-run)..Cross, Miller, Faria, Evitts [F/Ex]..65.8 Ht 10..Morton, Ermolenko, Smith, Hodgson..65.7 Ht 11..Wigg, Shirra, Cox, Schwartz..65.7 Ht 12..Tatum, Knight, Davis, Pfetzing [Fall]..65.2 Ht 13..Cox, Pfetzing, Evitts, Hodgson..66.6 Ht 14..Wigg, Morton, Davis, Faria..66.8 Ht 15..Tatum, Ermolenko, Shirra, Miller..65.6 Ht 16..Cross, Knight, Schwartz, Smith..65.9 Ht 17..Tatum, Wigg, Smith, Evitts..64.8 Ht 18..Morton, Pfetzing, Miller, Schwartz..65.1 Ht 19..Shirra, Cross, Davis, Hodgson..64.9 Ht 20..Cox, Faria, Knight, Ermolenko [Fall]..Awarded Ht 21..(run-off 10th place)..Smith, Faria..64.6 Ht 22..(run-off 1st place)..Cross, Tatum, Wigg

Well, that's an easy one - postponed due to weather.

Have to admit, that's a heck of a good reply. But I'm not deluded - I know that it will be hard to bring Babylon down, but it must be achieved in order to bring forth the New Jerusalem.

But at least with testicles and not terminally deluded.

I'd rather chop off my testicles than give one penny to the discredited BSI nevermind £60.

Does that surprise you? It doesn't surprise me. Increasingly, people only ever talk to me about the "atmosphere" and the social side of the fixture. That's hardly surprising, since the product on track is appalling.

Ooooooer Missus.

Schumi has seen the light, while the terminally deluded fumble around in the darkness, bound by chains of chauvinism.

You see, the no longer lusty, but still young, Schumi understands that you need a strong foundation for when the winds of changes shift. I'm always righteous, I stand up and I'm strong, I am forever young.

I'm in the construction industry - major building and civil engineering projects are my playground. The most important thing is foundations (as, incidentally, Multiplex found out to their cost at Wembley). And if you want British speedway to prosper on such limited and flawed foundations as the beggar I see no future for the sport. You let compromised foundations stay in place (in the GPs), then the whole structure is compromised.

You weren't one of the complainees then?

I reckon about 10th, but with Gollob and Adams likely to be retiring, so the terminally deluded will conclude, that'll be enough to justify an inclusion in 2007 for the beggar on the road to nowhere.

But, dear fellow, when is the END? Will all you delusional types suddenly start celebrating and boasting of how wrong I was when Nicholls finally manages to make it on merit? When will that be say the bells of Stepney? And like the great bell of Bow, you don't know. But you all thought it would be in 2005 - whoops, wrong. And then it would be 2006 - whoops, wrong again. Unlike everyone arguing for the beggar, I'm not bound by chauvinism - the shackles that bind you all to the serial failure have no hold over my spirit. I'm as free as I was all those years ago when, together with Holy Genghis, I bestrode the central Asian steppes with the mighty imperial tumens. And I shall remain a free man, albeit probably banned from the forum, while you are all slaves to dogma and revisionist claptrap. Not only is the Mongol innocent, he's also free.

And nor should he. I shall carry on campaigning for as long as the terminally deluded keep coming up with their revisionist nonsense - so they can keep complaining (sixteen complaints in two days got me a warning). Is speedway really in such a dismally sorry state that its future hinges on a rider of such blantently obvious and crude limitations? I'd like to believe speedway is stronger than that.

Correct. Ah happy, halycon days, roaming through Russia with Batu and the imperial tumens.

That's quite correct - he shouldn't be in the GPs. And he knows it. If he had any dignity, honour, integrity or shame he'd do the decent thing.

A bit like...a bit like...no Subedei, don't corrupt another thread.

It's all a dream, a delusion now. When will Olsen realise his temporary tracks are an abomination and an abortion?

Yes and that's a woman's prerogative.

What's worse is that the terminally deluded around here will still try and justify Nicholls' inclusion - you just wait. It's always next year with Nicholls. But next year is like tomorrow: it never bloody comes. In 2006 they were sure that "next year" Nicholls wouldn't just qualify, he'd be in the top three. Nicholls fed by the delusions of people around here believes he is British speedway.

Well, lusty young Schumi, you're heading in the right direction.

But it isn't valid. Nor is it particularly true. How many British fans will be supporting Crump, Nicki P, Hans Andersen and the like in 2007?

Oh woe is speedway - dependant on the inclusion of a serial failure with such obvious, crude limitations. And that isn't a valid reason either, is it?

That would be my guess - miserable little pleader.

Neither valid or justifiable. And what a truly woeful job BSI are doing if everything hinges on a rider of such obvious limitations as Nicholls.