Kent Vs Birmingham 7/9/25

[IainB]

On 9/9/2025 at 10:40 PM, old bob at herne bay said:

Always good for a laugh the "SCB" you could not make it up , they were incompetent when I attended speedway and haven't improved.   

Their grammatically incorrect statement  shows the completely amateur disorganised shower that are allegedly controlling the sport.  

"The SCB Referee at the Kent fixture had been informed that Mr Foord was unavailable for this fixture and having consulted the SCB had at that time had correctly allowed a facility, however on further investigation this should not have been authorised and the score of the guest for Cooper Rushen will be deleted from the meeting result." 

• So referee consulted the SCB and they had allowed the facility. (they repeated HAD twice for avoidance of doubt !) 
• "on further investigation" they changed their mind ! you cannot do that !!! amateur hour !!! 
• the score of the guest for Cooper Rushen  ???? what ???? I thought Cooper Rushen was THE guest rider ?? 

 

 

 

 

 

100% spot on, most people seem to have missed this, the SCB are basically admitting they messed up (not for the first time).

[Son of Shaleman]

48 minutes ago, IainB said:

100% spot on, most people seem to have missed this, the SCB are basically admitting they messed up (not for the first time).

SCB should have revoked the guest facility for Foord the moment Workington’s match was off. However, SCB is not structured to work that way. Its modus operandi is after the event.

[IainB]

1 hour ago, Son of Shaleman said:

SCB should have revoked the guest facility for Foord the moment Workington’s match was off. However, SCB is not structured to work that way. Its modus operandi is after the event.

SCB are basically saying we messed up, so we're going to punish Kent! Unbelievable!