Fromafar Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 17 hours ago, szkocjasid said: Can someone explain the logic behind the rule. If most heat advantages decide the tie, what's the reasoning behind two 4-2s being better than a 5-1 & a 3-3? Because 3-3 is not a heat advantage 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soupy Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 18 hours ago, szkocjasid said: Can someone explain the logic behind the rule. If most heat advantages decide the tie, what's the reasoning behind two 4-2s being better than a 5-1 & a 3-3? 3-3 is a draw for the second time so null points Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 5-1 & 3-3=8points to 4 4-2 & 4-2=8points to 4 as all points were equal over the two legs they went to heat advantages. 2advantages to 1advantage. Simples 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago They could deduct a point from the team whose rider caused the abandonment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, tyretrax said: They could deduct a point from the team whose rider caused the abandonment. Scunthorpe 😂 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.