Vincent Blachshadow 2,938 Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) They don't seem too bothered that Dryml is on loan continuously to Eastbourne, so can't see the difference. See Crump99's post #2385. There's your answer. Edited February 11, 2013 by Vincent Blackshadow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigcatdiary 3,175 Posted February 11, 2013 They don't seem too bothered that Dryml is on loan continuously to Eastbourne, so can't see the difference. Of course you don't, Dryml has never ridden for your team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,715 Posted February 11, 2013 Depends who the assett is really. If they are quiet and no trouble then you may have a point. However, if they are a pile of grief then the borrowing club gets what they want and can get rid when it suits whereas the owners have to clear the mess up every time. Who does a loan agreement suit best in such circumstances? Id say that means sake price for Troy should be around £5k.If he is such a problem his market value diminishes dramatically. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A ORLOV 8,628 Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) Do not forget there is a Supporters Club Quiz night this tues Feb 12th, 8pm at the Moonrakers. Eddie Kennett and Nick Morris are on the guest list.. Edited February 11, 2013 by A ORLOV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EnglishRoundabout 1,752 Posted February 11, 2013 How refreshing ORLOVSKI....a different topic!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orion 7,641 Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) And Peterborough fully intended to use Batch last year too, remember? He went missing until Peterborough gave up trying to contact him and built a team without him. He then resurfaced and signed for Swindon. So this current situation, taking last year into account, is exactly the same. Did they ? they sure gave up pretty quick as there team was the of the first to given out to the public if i remember,.hardly a massive effort to include him in the side . Glad to see that you see the Boro side of the story as gospel . Edited February 11, 2013 by orion 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barney Rabbit 732 Posted February 11, 2013 Did they ? they sure gave us pretty quick as there team was the of the first to given out to the public if i remember,.hardly a massive effort to include him in the side . Glad to see that you see the Boro side of the story as gospel . Maybe they were quick in working out why Batch wasn't answering his phone and changed tack before it was too late. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orion 7,641 Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) Maybe they were quick in working out why Batch wasn't answering his phone and changed tack before it was too late. They were quick getting there team out that's for sure, what makes it even more amazeing is how they got it out so quick seeing that Batch was so say in the side The bottom line is that Boro were more than happy not to have him in there side . Edited February 11, 2013 by orion 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barney Rabbit 732 Posted February 11, 2013 They were quick getting there team out that's for sure, what makes it even more amazeing is how they got it out so quick seeing that Batch was so say in the side The bottom line is that Boro were more than happy not have to him in there side . The team they declared after Batch ruled himself out contained six Panthers' assets (including a pair of double-uppers). Maybe it's quicker declaring a team with so many of your own assets. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YerRopes 3,009 Posted February 11, 2013 How refreshing ORLOVSKI....a different topic!! Good to see Jason and Zengi added to the Bob Kilby meeting alongside the 2013 Robins too 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
orion 7,641 Posted February 11, 2013 . Maybe it's quicker declaring a team with so many of your own assets. Well judgeing by your efforts this year maybe not ? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevebrum 6,835 Posted February 11, 2013 Of course you don't, Dryml has never ridden for your team. Nor would want him too. But i guess the message is clear - it is ok for an asset you don't want in the side to go out on loan season after season, but not allow another asset the same luxury. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crump99 4,487 Posted February 11, 2013 Id say that means sake price for Troy should be around £5k. If he is such a problem his market value diminishes dramatically. Well you can't really value Australia's no1 more than Andersen can you, although Batch'll think he's worth 7k at least. I'm sure the Panthers pair will be impressed that your valuation of them both would get you half a Linus Sundstrom, well it would have two years ago! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barney Rabbit 732 Posted February 11, 2013 Well judgeing by your efforts this year maybe not ? No, the hold-up was a non-asset. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,125 Posted February 11, 2013 Well you can't really value Australia's no1 more than Andersen can you, although Batch'll think he's worth 7k at least. I'm sure the Panthers pair will be impressed that your valuation of them both would get you half a Linus Sundstrom, well it would have two years ago! Batchelor aussie no.1? Are you mad he's not even in the top two Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
