Belle Vue National Stadium

[StevePark 2,783]

Maybe you are right iris123.

 

But crucially it doesn't help Speedway's credibility does it?

 

So you would rather deny young riders the opportunity to ride and have them not run a team?

[iris123 20,994]

Maybe you are right iris123.

 

But crucially it doesn't help Speedway's credibility does it?

I don't think anyone will really notice the damage to its credibility on this one

[foamfence 2,917]

Maybe you are right iris123.

 

But crucially it doesn't help Speedway's credibility does it?

Neither do a thousand and one other things, like in a TV meeting when there's practically no-one there and you saw half of the riders riding for another team, a week or two before.

[Little Thumper 528]

I don't think anyone will really notice the damage to its credibility on this one

 

You can only damage something that actually exists!

Neither do a thousand and one other things, like in a TV meeting when there's practically no-one there and you saw half of the riders riding for another team, a week or two before.

 

Two wrongs don't make a right!

[foamfence 2,917]

 

Well, I thought a big money man was taking over at Belle Vue?

At this rate, they'll be asking Buxton if they can run there!

 

I'm sure there must be some logic to this.........................but it is very well hidden!

And I thought a temporary promoter was to be put in place for up to three years, as agreed between the BSPA and the council. Unless you know something I don't.

[The White Knight 9,039]

 

You can only damage something that actually exists!

 

Two wrongs don't make a right!

Very true Little Thumper - very true.

[foamfence 2,917]

 

You can only damage something that actually exists!

 

Two wrongs don't make a right!

They don't indeed. what I mean is Speedway has no credibility whether this (joint) enterprise goes ahead or it doesn't.

[False dawn 2,298]

This is a kind of job sharing. Neither club clearly thought they could justify / support a full home programme so they take half of the "home" fixtures each. Once you get passed what we call the team it makes sense. Fans who are already supporting a Premier League club (we can hope) can support their junior side without going to 2 matches a week, every week.

[Little Thumper 528]

This is a kind of job sharing. Neither club clearly thought they could justify / support a full home programme so they take half of the "home" fixtures each. Once you get passed what we call the team it makes sense. Fans who are already supporting a Premier League club (we can hope) can support their junior side without going to 2 matches a week, every week.

 

Who do you think is going to want to watch this band of wandering minstrels?

[foamfence 2,917]

 

Who do you think is going to want to watch this band of wandering minstrels?

Personally I don't watch it anyway, too many old crocks and career NL riders.

[iris123 20,994]

 

Who do you think is going to want to watch this band of wandering minstrels?

Fans of the Harlem Globetrotters

[The White Knight 9,039]

I submit the following proposed names for said Team:

 

1) Covvue 'Acees'

 

2) Bellentry 'Beces'.

 

Just a thought.

 

:rofl:

[Little Thumper 528]

I submit the following proposed names for said Team:

 

1) Covvue 'Acees'

 

2) Bellentry 'Beces'.

 

Just a thought.

 

:rofl:

I don't think they need trouble themselves opening the track shop.

They ain't exactly going to be rushed off their feet.

[foamfence 2,917]

I submit the following proposed names for said Team:

 

1) Covvue 'Acees'

 

2) Bellentry 'Beces'.

 

Just a thought.

 

:rofl:

Couldn't 2) be Bellentry Feces?

[iris123 20,994]

Couldn't 2) be Bellentry Feces?

That is a crap name