sommelier 1,118 Posted February 15, 2015 Nice to see Peterborough had a stand at the paradise park today, fair play to you 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shadders 4,135 Posted February 15, 2015 Nice to see Peterborough had a stand at the paradise park today, fair play to youThey had one last year too. Sadly nothing from the local team Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maneacat 473 Posted February 15, 2015 I see from Post 1219 on the Coventry 2015 thread posted by Chris BART Simpson that Horton has been chucking toys out of the pram again and upsetting the Bees fans in the process - not a good way to kick off the new season - don't imagine there will be many Panthers fans surprised by this latest development. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hans fan 1,001 Posted February 16, 2015 I see from Post 1219 on the Coventry 2015 thread posted by Chris BART Simpson that Horton has been chucking toys out of the pram again and upsetting the Bees fans in the process - not a good way to kick off the new season - don't imagine there will be many Panthers fans surprised by this latest development. the only surprise is it took this long 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Noodles 1,337 Posted February 19, 2015 Ipswich/Mildenhall/neither who cares. The important thing for Peterborough is that he isn't an asset of his EL club and won't be missing any fixtures. Â SCB regulations state that if he is a NL rider then EL takes priority when neither club owns him. So if he is Mildenhal asset Wolves get priority, if he's an Ipswich asset then Peterborough get priority. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smod 145 Posted February 20, 2015 (edited) SCB regulations state that if he is a NL rider then EL takes priority when neither club owns him. So if he is Mildenhal asset Wolves get priority, if he's an Ipswich asset then Peterborough get priority. Â Not necessarily. Â Rule 16.1.2 states that, if he's an NL rider "an arrangement can be made", only if that isn't "arranged" would the EL club take priority. Â Having said that, I'd guess CVS might just be quicker to "arrange" things than Peterborough. Edited February 20, 2015 by smod Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BluTiger 21,701 Posted February 20, 2015 Â Not necessarily. Â Rule 16.1.2 states that, if he's an NL rider "an arrangement can be made", only if that isn't "arranged" would the EL club take priority. Â Having said that, I'd guess CVS might just be quicker to "arrange" things than Peterborough. Blackbird has already tweeted that Panthers will get priority on his services in 2015. One must presume he should know... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SCB 0 Posted February 20, 2015 Blackbird has already tweeted that Panthers will get priority on his services in 2015. One must presume he should know... Which suggests he's an Ipswich asset. If he's Mildenhalls, then Wolves can claim priority if they like. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Noodles 1,337 Posted February 20, 2015 Blackbird has already tweeted that Panthers will get priority on his services in 2015. One must presume he should know...He tweeted he is a Mildenhall asset, therefore he is wrong when he then says Panthers get priority. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crescent girl 1,907 Posted February 20, 2015 The poster above quotes rule 16.1.2 which says that an arrangement can be made to give Panthers priority if he belongs to an NL club. Â What's not to understand here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crump99 4,476 Posted February 20, 2015 The poster above quotes rule 16.1.2 which says that an arrangement can be made to give Panthers priority if he belongs to an NL club. Â What's not to understand here? Â Where speedway rules are concerned, everything. Rules only apply depending on who's asking and what day of the week it is. 16.1.2a can quickly be agreed at the next BSPA meeting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,706 Posted February 20, 2015 Which suggests he's an Ipswich asset. If he's Mildenhalls, then Wolves can claim priority if they like.or that PBoro have made the 'arrangement' in their favour. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SCB 0 Posted February 20, 2015 or that PBoro have made the 'arrangement' in their favour. You really think Wolves would agree to that? They'd be mad to. If he's riding for Peterborugh then one of two things is true. He is owned by Ipswich/Louis or CVS has gone mad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,706 Posted February 20, 2015 You really think Wolves would agree to that? They'd be mad to. If he's riding for Peterborugh then one of two things is true. He is owned by Ipswich/Louis or CVS has gone mad.does the rule state who has the say in the arrangement?Is it the EL club? Is that specifically in the reg? The 'arrangement' could be rider choice if not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdmc82 2,878 Posted February 21, 2015 I'm gonna take it that Blackbird has found out and knows what he's talking about so Peterborough will get priority. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
