Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

Every time we have gone down the No1 route in the last few years, we are in the bottom 3, last year a team in depth 4th. Time listen to the facts and not pander the the pleas of certain fans.

 

Going down the No1 route is fine, if you have one and probably two of the best reserves around, that is where they went wrong when putting that kind of team together. Last season the strength in depth approach worked, hopefully they will stick to what works, time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going down the No1 route is fine, if you have one and probably two of the best reserves around, that is where they went wrong when putting that kind of team together. Last season the strength in depth approach worked, hopefully they will stick to what works, time will tell.

Considering they started with only 1rider over 7 last season doesn't look promising for strength in depth team if the Aussie is a 7. Edited by Fromafar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not much mention of Vissing? Surely he'd be a no brainier on that average riding at 5 where Barker would take most of the pressure off him... Would've been a decent top two imo

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not much mention of Vissing? Surely he'd be a no brainier on that average riding at 5 where Barker would take most of the pressure off him... Would've been a decent top two imo

Im sure most Berwick fans have the same thoughts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like its between ourselves and Newcastle to pick the best of the remainder hopefully we get our 7 before Diamonds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every time we have gone down the No1 route in the last few years, we are in the bottom 3, last year a team in depth 4th. Time listen to the facts and not pander the the pleas of certain fans.

Didn't do Edinburgh any harm

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Going down the No1 route is fine, if you have one and probably two of the best reserves around, that is where they went wrong when putting that kind of team together..

that and injuries doesnt help Edited by abyassinian bandit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Plymouth have built there team round Ben Barker on a few occasions and look where it has got them

 

Absolutely nowhere.

Isn't that what I am saying, perhaps less direct

Why not much mention of Vissing? Surely he'd be a no brainier on that average riding at 5 where Barker would take most of the pressure off him... Would've been a decent top two imo

If they didn't kill each other in the pits, no love between those two

a lot of pressure on barker though he will be used to it riding for Plymouth

Remember!, one rider does not make a team

Didn't do Edinburgh any harm

That line up was a bit of a rarity, and well deserved for assembling a team like that. Looks like Glasgow may have achieved something similar, but via a different route, MONEY,MONEY. MONEY

that and injuries doesnt help

Injuries, weather etc. etc. always used as an excuse, it's generally the same for every team. You cannot run a team on IF,IF,IF, it always comes down to management. It's like saying in my shop, what IF I run out of watch batteries, it won't happen as I always make sure I havve enough stock to cover, with back up suppliers, just in case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't do Edinburgh any harm

 

Edinburgh build there team based on having a strong reserve and some middle order riders that can improve there average

 

They don't just sign Cookie and go from there

 

He was the 6th rider to put pen to paper for them this year

 

They build from the bottom.

 

 

Isn't that what I am saying, perhaps less direct

 

 

Yeah I was just being a bit more blunt :lol:

Edited by Hamster00

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Barkers average isn’t even that excessive for a Number 1. It will take a hell of an argument to convince me that signing him is a bad idea, it is an argument that I haven’t read on here yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Barkers average isn’t even that excessive for a Number 1. It will take a hell of an argument to convince me that signing him is a bad idea, it is an argument that I haven’t read on here yet.

 

I'm not saying it's a bad idea I just think it's a better idea to build the team differently build it around riders that can improve there average

 

Edinburgh have seemed to build around Wolbert, Sedgmen and the reserves and then fit Cookie in from there rather than sign Cookie and work from there as we have done with Barker

 

Maybe it is just my perception of how they do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Barker was signed as one of the riders who can improve his average?

 

Do you actually need an excessive gain in average to win the league now, or have a good season? Berwick ended last season 4th, with a team average of 43.16, over the course of the season they didn’t even add a point to their team total.

Edited by sparkafag

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy