Red Panda 366 Posted December 9, 2015 take your last paragraph though and replace 'pensioners' with "under 35s' or '35 to50' or '50 to 65' and broadly the same points apply. The majority do not haves loads tucked away A fair few live in poverty. Those stuck in the middle fear about how than can afford to run their homes and are plodding along. Im sure that SCB would also point out that at least they have homes to sell to fund care. Many current under 35s wont and also face the prospect of having to make compulsary payments during their working lives to plan to fund those costs. In those circumstances can a special discount be justified for any one group? As someone who is in the later of the three groups you mention I do have to agree with you.........we just happened to get on the property ladder at the right time.................we are not on a high income and have no savings...............my 25 year old daughter and her boyfriend have little or no chance of doing so................she has a steady job and he is self employed and does not have much work at the moment............... I got a life..... just get your facts right in future , and if you not sure about something dont pretend to know the 'facts ' when you dont - simple really i also have an opinion , and mine is that your trolling nature support for your team sometimes backfires when your caught out! that will most likely change - Only one troll around here and that is you............and your constant snipe against everything and everyone related to Poole............I have already stated several times that I had not seen the article in question but you obviously did not read that..............I stand by what I believe in..............just remember when I state a fact which is 100% accurate next time not to bite my head off..................and tell me I am wrong............I do not like being accused of things that I have not said................... RP 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E I Addio 15,845 Posted December 9, 2015 (edited) Coming from one the biggest and most predicable hypocrites on here - who generally posts and never fails to make others give up half-way through yet another tedious and long-winded observation - Thanks for the laugh! Also for a complete change, keeping it short this time! Unlike you, I will only make comment on any future positive Poole Speedway information etc which many like you fail to appreciate or prefer to ignore Up The Pirates! EDIT: Nice to see and also highly predicable you got a "like" from one of the usual suspects " BWitcher " Coming from one the biggest and most predicable hypocrites on here - who generally posts and never fails to make others give up half-way through yet another tedious and long-winded observation - Thanks for the laugh! Also for a complete change, keeping it short this time! Unlike you, I will only make comment on any future positive Poole Speedway information etc which many like you fail to appreciate or prefer to ignore Up The Pirates! EDIT: Nice to see and also highly predicable you got a "like" from one of the usual suspects " BWitcher " Pity the poster who pontificates about the alleged playground behaviour of others resorts to attacking the poster and not the post, but insults are like water off a ducks back, so I shan't be losing sleep. Pity you can't deal with a post on its merits. Edited December 9, 2015 by E I Addio 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,035 Posted December 9, 2015 PM sent Lisa. Received, thanks PQ7. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chris4gillian 1,832 Posted December 9, 2015 Same s**t - just another day with a few posters trying to win an argument with pathetic "play-ground" nonsense within posts displayed purely trying to get one over someone when in fact it only displays a lack of personal class as they fail to see they are an embarrassment. The most pathetic thing is most are of an age to know better and blame "Starman etc when really, take a dam good look in the mirror Guys Are you Starman's best mate? Come on, he posts childish drivel, name calls and is an embarrassment and it's starting to wear a bit thin on some of us fellow Pirate supporters as it hogs all of our threads. Most playground nonsense emanates from one source. I fail to see how that's 'trying to get one over' someone!?! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Poole Quay 7 616 Posted December 9, 2015 (edited) Pity the poster who pontificates about the alleged playground behaviour of others resorts to attacking the poster and not the post, but insults are like water off a ducks back, so I shan't be losing sleep. Pity you can't deal with a post on its merits. One of the many reasons you are indeed a hypocrite and which I have in the past proved is the way you continually criticise others ( particularly starman) You only have to ask and I will yet again show who " pontificates" but to be fair, most on here know when it comes to that - Then yes, you are a two-faced hypocrite and the way you deny it and attempt to deflect from what is so obvious - says even more about you then any further words. Are you Starman's best mate? Come on, he posts childish drivel, name calls and is an embarrassment and it's starting to wear a bit thin on some of us fellow Pirate supporters as it hogs all of our threads. Most playground nonsense emanates from one source. I fail to see how that's 'trying to get one over' someone!?! I suggest you read my post a few days ago in criticism of Starman and which we discussed in private and addressed and which I think on reflection, you actually "liked" To be fair while my criticism was observation, yours and a few other's are actually boarding on obsession!? Let it go man or get off that cloud you falsely sit on! ( Joke before perhaps you may take it the wrong way!?) Edited December 9, 2015 by Poole Quay 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chris4gillian 1,832 Posted December 9, 2015 One of the many reasons you are indeed a hypocrite and which I have in the past proved is the way you continually criticise others ( particularly starman) You only have to ask and I will yet again show who " pontificates" but to be fair, most on here know when it comes to that - Then yes, you are a two-faced hypocrite and the way you deny it and attempt to deflect from what is so obvious - says even more about you then any further words. I suggest you read my post a few days ago in criticism of Starman and which we discussed in private and addressed and which I think on reflection, you actually "liked" To be fair while my criticism was observation, yours and a few other's are actually boarding on obsession!? Let it go man or get off that cloud you falsely sit on! ( Joke before perhaps you may take it the wrong way!?) I have explained my reasoning about it getting very tiresome that every Poole thread goes down the same route and one poster is at the centre of it every time. That's not obsession, it's merely pointing out a fact - not a personal opinion on this occasion. Oh and we've discussed nothing privately so I have no idea what you're referring to there fella...have you been on the Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillipsr 2,057 Posted December 9, 2015 Just shoot people at 65 abd the problem goes away, there pretty useless after that anyway Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E I Addio 15,845 Posted December 9, 2015 One of the many reasons you are indeed a hypocrite and which I have in the past proved is the way you continually criticise others ( particularly starman) You only have to ask and I will yet again show who " pontificates" but to be fair, most on here know when it comes to that - Then yes, you are a two-faced hypocrite and the way you deny it and attempt to deflect from what is so obvious - says even more about you then any further words. Whether I am a hypocrite or not is completely irrelevant to the discussion since the forum rules are that one should attack the poster and not the post. My posts are on the record to be pulled apart by anyone who can demonstrate that they are factually incorrect. Thats what a discussion forum is about. The fact that you seem only able to attack me and not factual accuracy of my posts indicates that they are generally well founded, which is perhaps more than can be said for your name calling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Poole Quay 7 616 Posted December 9, 2015 I have explained my reasoning about it getting very tiresome that every Poole thread goes down the same route and one poster is at the centre of it every time. That's not obsession, it's merely pointing out a fact - not a personal opinion on this occasion. Oh and we've discussed nothing privately so I have no idea what you're referring to there fella...have you been on the When I was discussing a PM I actually meant to Starman - Sorry for any confusion! If it's an opinion that you continually say most days. then sorry, but that seems boarding on " obsession" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Poole Quay 7 616 Posted December 9, 2015 (edited) Whether I am a hypocrite or not is completely irrelevant to the discussion since the forum rules are that one should attack the poster and not the post. My posts are on the record to be pulled apart by anyone who can demonstrate that they are factually incorrect. Thats what a discussion forum is about. The fact that you seem only able to attack me and not factual accuracy of my posts indicates that they are generally well founded, which is perhaps more than can be said for your name calling. "My goodness, there are some blinkered thickos on the South Coast" "the usual trolls andStarman and a few others take th bit every time. If rvryone with a grain of common sense recognised the thread for what it has now become, and simply stopped taking the bait the trolls wouidnt have anyone to bait and if would die off." ( Talking of drinking! ) "Steve was the self styled "Porn Baron and Number One Poole Fan ( or it might have been the other way round ) .He ran a respectable porno film establishment from the flat over the Post Office in Cheatford Muddlo, near Blandford Forum called Sexy Steve's " Nasty I could go on but please give up the false pretence. You are a total hypocrite regardless how much you find comfortable back-tracking and actually NOT denying it. Pathetic and to be fair, rather embarrassing Edited December 9, 2015 by Poole Quay 7 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E I Addio 15,845 Posted December 9, 2015 (edited) "My goodness, there are some blinkered thickos on the South Coast" "the usual trolls andStarman and a few others take th bit every time. If rvryone with a grain of common sense recognised the thread for what it has now become, and simply stopped taking the bait the trolls wouidnt have anyone to bait and if would die off." ( Talking of drinking! ) "Steve was the self styled "Porn Baron and Number One Poole Fan ( or it might have been the other way round ) .He ran a respectable porno film establishment from the flat over the Post Office in Cheatford Muddlo, near Blandford Forum called Sexy Steve's " Nasty I could go on but please give up the false pretence. You are an total hypocrite regardless how much you find comfortable back-stepping. All factually correct . Its how Steve styles himself on twitter ! https://twitter.com/steve_shovlar Edited December 9, 2015 by E I Addio Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Poole Quay 7 616 Posted December 9, 2015 (edited) All factually correct . Its how Steve styles himself on twitter ! https://twitter.com/steve_shovlar Twist and turn as much as you like to get yourself out of a public problem embarrassment but I'm satisfied we can now see you for what you are and in future, I suggest you don't start what you unable to finish. Edited December 9, 2015 by Poole Quay 7 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Starman2006 2,354 Posted December 9, 2015 Are you Starman's best mate? Come on, he posts childish drivel, name calls and is an embarrassment and it's starting to wear a bit thin on some of us fellow Pirate supporters as it hogs all of our threads. Most playground nonsense emanates from one source. I fail to see how that's 'trying to get one over' someone!?! And you have the nerve to call me blinkered... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
E I Addio 15,845 Posted December 9, 2015 (edited) Twist and turn as much as you like but I'm satisfied we can see you for what you are and in future, I suggest you don't start what you unable finish. And how you attempt to twist and turn to get yourself out a problem Its not twisting and turning to use a description that someone actually uses to promote himself on twitter. That is simply stating fact. Shot yourself in the foot again there I am afraid. Bit of a whoosh in other words. Edited December 9, 2015 by E I Addio 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paulsmith 14 Posted December 9, 2015 When you can match the standard of of statmans posts then you can reply chris g .intill then know your roll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
