james1234 49 Posted December 22, 2017 If Holder is not in the team I can see possibly the last 3 being Doyle,Andersen and a 3 pointer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DunRobin 465 Posted December 22, 2017 4 hours ago, Steve0 said: Dream On!! Don't take any notice of someone who has a user name otherwise used for dirty underpants! Perhaps that's why his posts are all sh**te! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Agrotron 955 Posted December 22, 2017 40 minutes ago, poole keith said: not sure about the 50p valuation lol,however any promoter would be totally insane to pay anywhere remotely close to the supposed asking price What about a BOGOF offer by one get the other sister free! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dump that clutch 630 Posted December 22, 2017 6 hours ago, Steve0 said: This means absolutely jack! A few years ago, Swindon were looking to use Miedzinski and he went to Poole. Swindon demanded that this was a full transfer and Poole said no - a loan only. It went to arbitration and on loan he went - turning a valuable asset on a really low average into a worthless asset on a much higher average. So Poole can demand a fee but the precedence has been set and the boot is on the other foot now! just shows you what a hypocrite MF is... like above, it was good then it still stands now. 6 hours ago, Skidder1 said: Maybe in the 6 seasons that have passed since then, the rules have been changed?! oh yeah, we forgot, it's Poole.. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,033 Posted December 22, 2017 54 minutes ago, DunRobin said: Don't take any notice of someone who has a user name otherwise used for dirty underpants! Perhaps that's why his posts are all sh**te! Actually his posts are pretty informative. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,033 Posted December 22, 2017 23 minutes ago, dump that clutch said: just shows you what a hypocrite MF is... like above, it was good then it still stands now. oh yeah, we forgot, it's Poole.. You Swindon fans are a moody lot... 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dump that clutch 630 Posted December 22, 2017 so what's different then Lisa..? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gavan 5,050 Posted December 22, 2017 1 hour ago, lisa-colette said: You Swindon fans are a moody lot... Not moody at all...................just hoping that a rule Poole used to get AM can be the same rule that means Holder goes to Somerset. Funny how some Poole fans dont like it when it happens back to them! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,033 Posted December 22, 2017 17 minutes ago, Gavan said: Not moody at all...................just hoping that a rule Poole used to get AM can be the same rule that means Holder goes to Somerset. Funny how some Poole fans dont like it when it happens back to them! Not bothered about it, as long as Somerset seeked permission to speak to Chris then it's fine! You can't blame Matt for trying to get a full transfer if there is no TV money and if it's true Chris isn't interested in riding for Poole again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,033 Posted December 22, 2017 1 hour ago, dump that clutch said: so what's different then Lisa..? Rules change every year, why can't this one? Though he will prob end up being loaned out in the end! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,637 Posted December 22, 2017 2 hours ago, DunRobin said: Don't take any notice of someone who has a user name otherwise used for dirty underpants! Perhaps that's why his posts are all sh**te! Somewhat uncalled for but each to their own I guess?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pirates Of Poole 761 Posted December 22, 2017 (edited) 12 hours ago, Gavan said: Not moody at all...................just hoping that a rule Poole used to get AM can be the same rule that means Holder goes to Somerset. Funny how some Poole fans dont like it when it happens back to them! Think some on here have a very short memory!! December 2011!!!!! Um sounds similar to Adrian M but at that point he had not signed for Poole at that point!!! http://www.peterboroughpanthers.co/news.php?extend.1470 So just to confirm 5th Dec Swindon announced Batch 2011 - Adrian was announced 19th January 2012 - so who set the ball rolling then????? Robins?? Funny how some people forget this little chestnut! Edited December 23, 2017 by Pirates Of Poole Update 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,096 Posted December 23, 2017 12 hours ago, Pirates Of Poole said: Think some on here have a very short memory!! December 2011!!!!! Um sounds similar to Adrian M but at that point he had not signed for Poole at that point!!! http://www.peterboroughpanthers.co/news.php?extend.1470 So just to confirm 5th Dec Swindon announced Batch 2011 - Adrian was announced 19th January 2012 - so who set the ball rolling then????? Robins?? Funny how some people forget this little chestnut! What! The squeaky clean Robins made an illegal approach! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve0 5,517 Posted December 23, 2017 13 hours ago, Pirates Of Poole said: Think some on here have a very short memory!! December 2011!!!!! Um sounds similar to Adrian M but at that point he had not signed for Poole at that point!!! http://www.peterboroughpanthers.co/news.php?extend.1470 So just to confirm 5th Dec Swindon announced Batch 2011 - Adrian was announced 19th January 2012 - so who set the ball rolling then????? Robins?? Funny how some people forget this little chestnut! So is this another example showing that Somerset should get Noddy on loan rather than a full transfer or just you muddying the waters? The example I used was justification for Poole not getting a transfer fee - no Swindon involvement and no dates about who did what first! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theblueboy 960 Posted December 23, 2017 (edited) http://www.swindonrobins.co/news.php?extend.1576 So, Miedzinski was offered personal terms in November but chose not to accept them as he was tapped up elsewhere. Swindon say no communication from Miedzinski from the beginning of December. So, it’s clear that Swindon had not named their side at this point as AM was still being considered. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/sport/speedway/speedway-who-s-who-in-the-panthers-squad-for-2012-1-3290264/amp Then, according to the BBC website Peterborough announced their line up in the last week of November 2011 but were looking to use Troy in the first week of December? http://www.peterboroughpanthers.co/news.php?extend.1470 I am hoping you lads on the South Coast aren’t policeman with this sort of detective work. Edited December 23, 2017 by theblueboy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites