False dawn 2,298 Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Aces51 said: Nobody on here knows the grounds of appeal, nobody knows the evidence that was adduced Perhaps a bit more transparency would avoid wild speculation. It always better to tell the truth rather than people making up something worse. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Skid 425 Posted September 26, 2019 He certainly leads a charmed life, must have friends in high places. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tyretrax 2,253 Posted September 26, 2019 16 minutes ago, Lord Skid said: He certainly leads a charmed life, must have friends in high places. Just a good lawyer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Skid 425 Posted September 26, 2019 Must of had him quite a while then. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
proud panther 1,505 Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Lord Skid said: He certainly leads a charmed life, must have friends in high places. Buster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
waytogo28 2,054 Posted September 28, 2019 On 9/26/2019 at 9:25 PM, proud panther said: Buster Cook is not enough of a Yes Buster, No Buster, Three Bags Full Buster - kind of man to counter Buster as his friend. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
proud panther 1,505 Posted September 28, 2019 2 hours ago, waytogo28 said: Cook is not enough of a Yes Buster, No Buster, Three Bags Full Buster - kind of man to counter Buster as his friend. It helped Kings Lynn. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
uk_martin 1,606 Posted September 29, 2019 On 9/26/2019 at 6:23 PM, False dawn said: Perhaps a bit more transparency would avoid wild speculation. It always better to tell the truth rather than people making up something worse. Compare and contrast this to the verdict from the Rugby World Cup citing committee, over the Piers Francis high tackle. https://www.englandrugby.com/news/article/disciplinary-francis-cleared-to-play?fbclid=IwAR3sXcQsmrdiK-VIx_m7mWWPla7G7PSEOJbFcrreIiD49pe5Y9PDDHwnf-Q Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
woofers 467 Posted October 1, 2019 On 9/29/2019 at 3:04 PM, uk_martin said: Compare and contrast this to the verdict from the Rugby World Cup citing committee, over the Piers Francis high tackle. https://www.englandrugby.com/news/article/disciplinary-francis-cleared-to-play?fbclid=IwAR3sXcQsmrdiK-VIx_m7mWWPla7G7PSEOJbFcrreIiD49pe5Y9PDDHwnf-Q One is a successful and professionally run organisation that understands and respects it’s players, sponsors and supporters.......the other seems to be the complete opposite, and doesn’t appear to care what anyone thinks either. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites