Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Witches v Aces Play off Semi Final 1st leg 29/9/22

Recommended Posts

Surprised no thread started already

Would've called this one as too tight to name a favourite a month or so ago but the potential fragility at reserve since Danyon's injury tips it now towards the Aces

Witches haven't shown the ability to pick up regular big home wins but this would be the perfect time to pull one out

Even a 20 point lead wouldn't make then favourites but would make it very interesting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Surprised no thread started already

Would've called this one as too tight to name a favourite a month or so ago but the potential fragility at reserve since Danyon's injury tips it now towards the Aces

Witches haven't shown the ability to pick up regular big home wins but this would be the perfect time to pull one out

Even a 20 point lead wouldn't make then favourites but would make it very interesting

You got a thing about a 20 point lead! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully expect Belle Vue to take a lead to Manchester, the reserve pairing for Ipswich isn't going to be good enough not for the want of trying!  42-48 Aces

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, lisa-colette said:

You got a thing about a 20 point lead! ;)

Yeah it's a nice round number :D

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest,,, I don't care,,,I won't be going,,, washing my hair.  How anyone can take this meeting seriously is beyond me,, you can't have a play off system of who faces who on where you finish in league when all league meetings haven't taken place.  Would be funny to now have a few rain offs before the Sheffield Ipswich meet,, with Ipswich then finishing top and then facing Wolves,, 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before Mikebv gets to excited about Chris Harris guesting  his average is to high for Fricke if hes out injured by 0.01 it seems for September 

Edited by scoobydoo
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Baldyman said:

To be honest,,, I don't care,,,I won't be going,,, washing my hair.  How anyone can take this meeting seriously is beyond me,, you can't have a play off system of who faces who on where you finish in league when all league meetings haven't taken place.  Would be funny to now have a few rain offs before the Sheffield Ipswich meet,, with Ipswich then finishing top and then facing Wolves,, 

The rules have been clear all season on the completion date for meetings, it’s beyond me why promotions don’t do more to ensure this happens. Far too many unused dates leading to trying to cram them in the last couple of weeks. To be fair though had we not had the cancelled days for the queens mourning it may have just been possible.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another playoffs Belle Vue going into with a heatleader out injured, happens every year. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DazS said:

another reason lemon might keep his job.

As he's the CEO is he going to sack himself?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Rob B said:

Another playoffs Belle Vue going into with a heatleader out injured, happens every year. 

At least you can book Harris or Klindt for both legs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TTT said:

At least you can book Harris or Klindt for both legs.

Can't book either as Klindt riding for Kings Lynn and Harris average too high by 0.01

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rob B said:

As he's the CEO is he going to sack himself?

he should do:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rob B said:

Can't book either as Klindt riding for Kings Lynn and Harris average too high by 0.01

Would you be allowed to sign a rider under an injury replacement rule hidden somewhere? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy