GiveusaB 1,145 Posted July 13, 2023 Guest facility it is then! Bugger....Nicholls and Harris both in action next Wednesday Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barabas 69 Posted July 13, 2023 If u don't want to take the test your obviously taking drugs simple as that so that's why it's regarded as a failure ...its his own stupid fault 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,030 Posted July 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, GiveusaB said: Guest facility it is then! Bugger....Nicholls and Harris both in action next Wednesday Ha. Pickering or King best options. Nick ave with extra 5% allowed at home is 9.26 and Dougie is 9.29!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lbw 869 Posted July 13, 2023 19 minutes ago, Najjer said: Utter rubbish - regardless of whose fault it was, you put on a sub standard product then you can’t expect people to pay for it… and if you do expect that, don’t expect them to return in the future, which has for a long time been speedway’s biggest issue. I myself provide a service to my customers on a daily service and if I provided a poor product or service, then I wouldn’t expect people to pay me just because it might mean my business would close. It’s down to me to keep my customer’s happy. U are correct but like I've been told before on another scenario by a former promoter when.refused a goodwill gesture........"You're a speedway supporter so you have to accept it!" I never went to that track again while he was the promoter! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,030 Posted July 13, 2023 1 minute ago, lbw said: U are correct but like I've been told before on another scenario by a former promoter when.refused a goodwill gesture........"You're a speedway supporter so you have to accept it!" I never went to that track again while he was the promoter! Name and shame!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marky_Mark 55 Posted July 13, 2023 Why was no facility granted last night when both clubs can now (rightly) have a facility for the next 30 days? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lbw 869 Posted July 13, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, lisa-colette said: Name and shame!! Rick Frost Peterborough Edited July 13, 2023 by lbw Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MartinBSN 617 Posted July 13, 2023 34 minutes ago, Najjer said: Utter rubbish - regardless of whose fault it was, you put on a sub standard product then you can’t expect people to pay for it… and if you do expect that, don’t expect them to return in the future, which has for a long time been speedway’s biggest issue. I myself provide a service to my customers on a daily service and if I provided a poor product or service, then I wouldn’t expect people to pay me just because it might mean my business would close. It’s down to me to keep my customer’s happy. Again, at no point have I suggested Birmingham should expect people to not want a refund. I’m simply making a suggestion that those that can afford to could maybe look at the bigger picture Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StephenMiller 75 Posted July 13, 2023 15 minutes ago, lisa-colette said: Ha. Pickering or King best options. Nick ave with extra 5% allowed at home is 9.26 and Dougie is 9.29!! Josh Pickering if he's available surely ? Most exciting rider around Perry Barr apart from Harris Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lbw 869 Posted July 13, 2023 9 minutes ago, Marky_Mark said: 10 minutes ago, Marky_Mark said: Why was no facility granted last night when both clubs can now (rightly) have a facility for the next 30 days? Guess because he was in the team declared to ride that night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
michanekman 14 Posted July 13, 2023 5 minutes ago, MartinBSN said: Again, at no point have I suggested Birmingham should expect people to not want a refund. I’m simply making a suggestion that those that can afford to could maybe look at the bigger picture Actually Martin that's exactly what you were suggesting ... or it certainly came across that way. No contact or apology from Birmingham Speedway so far - that's the most annoying thing. Speedway promoters haven't got the first idea about customer relations. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MartinBSN 617 Posted July 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, michanekman said: Actually Martin that's exactly what you were suggesting ... or it certainly came across that way. No contact or apology from Birmingham Speedway so far - that's the most annoying thing. Speedway promoters haven't got the first idea about customer relations. It’s definitely not exactly what I said. At no point was expected used. I have no affiliation with Birmingham or their stream. I’m making a suggestion of “wouldn’t it be nice as it wasn’t the clubs fault, those that could afford it could leave their money in and help a club in need out” Your answer to that could easily have just been no 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GiveusaB 1,145 Posted July 13, 2023 14 minutes ago, StephenMiller said: Josh Pickering if he's available surely ? Most exciting rider around Perry Barr apart from Harris Probably a bit premature to be discussing a guest for next Week v Poole.....but I'm not sure whether Pickering has fully recovered from his recent injury, so, with that in mind, I'd go for Danny King or Craig Cook !! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lbw 869 Posted July 13, 2023 1 minute ago, GiveusaB said: Probably a bit premature to be discussing a guest for next Week v Poole.....but I'm not sure whether Pickering has fully recovered from his recent injury, so, with that in mind, I'd go for Danny King or Craig Cook !! Either way u Brummies better watch out for the Magnificent 7 on board the Pirate Ship! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigcatdiary 3,165 Posted July 13, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Marky_Mark said: Why was no facility granted last night when both clubs can now (rightly) have a facility for the next 30 days? Because they followed the rulebook and that’s what it states. 8.2.1 I) A refusal to undergo Anti Doping testing will be regarded for the purpose of application of penalties, identical to a positive test. 8.2.1 j) A rider who refuses to submit themselves prior to the start f heat 1to Anti Doping testing will be automatically excluded from further participation in that particular event. 8.2.1 z) If the outcome of the test(s) result is an immediate exclusion from the event, reserves or TS may be used to take the programmed rides where the excluded rider may have ridden Seems to have been followed to the letter. Edited July 13, 2023 by bigcatdiary 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
