Think your number 2 needs to be a 4.00 rider and hope they improve,that top4 will win plenty of meetings,you don’t need your reserves to be good at the start of season it’s the end that they need to be.

Same here,but I think Castagna is not at Edinburgh so will be interesting to see where he ends up as he’s definitely better than his average.

In charge of what? Coleman is in charge of Ipswich and nothing else.    He’s not trying to get around anything and people who have used the word “loophole” on here clearly have no idea what that actual word means.    The regulations for assessing averages are there for all to see, its black and white., no grey.    The only thing we don’t currently know, is whether those regulations have been altered for 2027.

In charge of what? Coleman is in charge of Ipswich and nothing else.    He’s not trying to get around anything and people who have used the word “loophole” on here clearly have no idea what that actual word means.    The regulations for assessing averages are there for all to see, its black and white., no grey.    The only thing we don’t currently know, is whether those regulations have been altered for 2027.

Unless you have a Rushen/Cairns starting on a 2pt average, going with 2 normal 2 pointers will not get you anywhere, Surely if you have 2 top heat leaders already, the need for another is not there, build to get an at least half decent reserve.

They used his latest Rzeszów average at the time from poland league 2 of 1.919 per race (x4 = 7.676) Falls into the 6.00 bracket: "Polish league 1 (Metalkas 2) with a published average of 6.00 or above" Kvech in 2024 for Lynn wasnt a GP 8 even though he was in the series. First GP year so they used his polish league conversion in same way  By the 2026 rules hes a 4.50 but its still a guess till they publish 2027 rule book