I kind of find it worrying that you lot aren't worried that a club that includes the chairman backed an other club into a corner to agree to have a guest that they shouldn't have. If it was Poole's idea then fair enough but KL should have let us use Ellis.
Okay, so there was contact. It's a shame you don't get to hear the ref's reasoning for making that decision. Maybe he thought MPT could have stayed on?
For your info Gavan I didn't say that the ref made the right decision. I said from the back and side angle it looked 50/50 and the front angle looked like there was contact.
Poole couldn't do that as last time I looked greyhounds had all those days.
Edit - looks like they've changed the Friday for a Tuesday! So potentially Poole could do a Friday. Would actually suit me better too, no after school activities that day!
Unbelievable! You want someone banned for an accident, not like he just completely rode into him. From the side and back angle it looks 50/50. What if MPT didn't get injured? Would you still want Jakobsen banned? Or is it purely based on if someone picks up an injury, not actually the incident?
Why don't you lot stop talking to him. Having the last word isn't everything!
Now someone mentioned Leicester going down? Surely the league can't continue with just 6 teams?
A lot of talk on Twitter about not having a points limit. If they did that would that mean we would have to use squads? If not how would it even work??