szkocjasid

Jack Holder didn't get a ban when he missed a match due to a family illness. Seems like if his wife or kids had to go to hospital no ban, but if a rider was unwell & had to go to hospital gets a 7 day suspension. Doesn't make sense.

Have you seen Zach's FB page, full of fans congratulating him on his performance. Although tbf you see that on all riders pages, even when they are awful, fans will always be like "you did your best", "you win as a team & lose as a team", "you'll be better next time". Kinda like they are talking to a child tbh. I'm not saying they should be cruel obviously, but wonder if that's the best motivation for a rider?

Vinnie Foord missing again, Dayle Wood guests.

While I agree with that, I would have said the same about Ben Cook & look what happened with him. Rider missing matches while racing abroad happens more & more these last few seasons, it's gotten to the point fans may wonder if their Polish club will "allow" them to race over here.

Except for your number one.

Sounds very poor from Berwick not to add an insert into the programme

If Lasse did indeed cause Joe T to fall, then I'd exclude Lasse for being the cause of the stoppage & Kerr for not being under power after his fall. Can't see Lasse being at fault for Kerr's fall.

I did wonder if Lasse caught Joe & caused him to lift, but I think they just missed, so appeared that Kerr caused Joe to fall.

Tate seems to be going better away than at home, Vuolas the opposite. One match fans will comment Annti needs to do better, the next night it'll be Tate needs to do better.

Just to be picky, Plymouth didn't lose a heat leader, they lost a second string riding at number 3. ps Get well soon Lasse

Just seen a video of heat 3. Looked like Fredriksen picked up on his own & crashed, but then Kerr clipped Joe T & they both came down. Could have excluded both Fredriksen & Kerr imo.

I guess that means if a rider was genuinely ill, but his club couldn't find a similar averaged rider to guest & best option was actually 75% of his average, the club could then say "he's not ill, he just can't be bothered" so he doesn't get a 7 day suspension for a non-speedway injury / illness?

I'm wondering why Barker got the IRR ride in heat 3. In normal circumstances it would be used in heat 12 - to avoid both reserves having to go out together. While Barker win the heat, so it looks like it worked, as Plymouth knew Kerr was excluded from the re-run, I wonder if they would've put Spencer out, guaranteed at least a 3-3 using your weakest rider? As it turns out, with Kerr excluded from heat 12, they've got a guaranteed at least a 3-3 using their weakest rider in that heat anyway.

Berwick had the opportunity to swap either rider for Trigger. I would've brought him in for Smith.

While I agree Hagon should have done better, perhaps the reason his average is so low, is that he's a reserve riding at number 2 & sometimes 3? Progress would've been keeping his average in a tougher position, but even that didn't happen. Of course this now means he's got a better chance of finding a team place next year.

Looking forward to Scunny fans being forced to praise Lambert lol!

Quite a lot of rules need sorting out.

Fair point, Poole could be back at Glasgow in later competitions. In which case, do Glasgow want to be giving him paid practice?

Don't think it's anything to do with that, Nicholls only rode 1 match before the August averages were declared. If he scored a 15 max in every match since then, Nicolai would still be number one (till September).

I see Tobias Thomsen is guesting for Glasgow's rivals for top spot! Conflict of interest? Or knows Glasgow would win anyway?

VP missed Oxford's match last night, 7 day suspension would start then.

Just because he failed to win doesn't automatically mean he wasn't a good manager, it's the riders on track that need to perform. Maybe GB were just never THAT good? While GB were always amoungst the favourites, don't think they were ever out & out favourites.

I never realised he hadn't ridden a match yet, seems like he signed quite a while ago?

According to the Ipswich post it's r/r for Tungate, McDiarmind for Palovaara. But Palovaara has a higher average than Tungate, why not use r/r for him, gives Lawson an extra ride?

While I totally agree with that, it's not really a track where it's easy to block someone, there would also be no harm in trying, if Bewley lost first place by slowing up, it wouldn't have cost them anything.