szkocjasid

Especially with Glasgow having the weakest reserves (on paper) in the league. Both have upped their averages, but would still look like Tigers weak link. Last night was a impressive by them, Tigers fans will be delighted, but Bandits fans would've been expecting Smith to have the better of them. While play-offs are still possible, I'd give Trigger a shot.

It can change each week, but Workington already had 2 points deducted, so weren't favourites for a top 4 spot (at least in my opinion) so a home defeat was very costly for them. I rated Berwick's chances higher, especially since their changes & a great result at Glasgow, all undone by dropping points at home in the return leg. All the teams bar Scunthorpe & Plymouth can still make the play-offs, but I feel a gap has appeared below the "top 4" & challengers.

Perhaps make the rule clubs don't get a "facility" when a rider races abroad, clubs would have to choose between a rider who puts GB first, or risk having to use a 75% guest all the time?

Have to agree, Klindt doesn't get a ban because Plymouth don't mind being weakened! Turns out their guest did well, but doesn't sit right with me.

Only about 3 points over the points limit lol!

Yeah agree, I'd have Hagon at 2.

With Workington, Berwick & Oxford having a poor day, think the top 4 looks to be, Poole, Glasgow, Edinburgh & Redcar.

If Plymouth aren't allowed a guest for Klindt, would be not get a 28 day ban then?

Yeah, that's an odd one, r/r must be stronger than Thomsen you'd think?

Looking at the August averages, Birmingham will be 8.97 below the points limit!

Kerr's 2025 Prem average is 5.33 (6.20 with bonus points). That's very decent. A couple of poorer matches doesn't mean he's struggled all year. You could argue his Poole average should be much higher, compared to his Sheffield one!

Well JJ won heat 8 & 12, don't know if that proves my point or yours lol!

Actually it could be, if Morris was worse than guest scores!

Heat 7 was the best I've ever seen Kyle Thompson ride, bouncing off the fence to beat Luke Harrison & Jake Allen.

If Birmingham announced that in their press release, no-one could blame them. But they announced it was a mutual decision i.e Edwards wanted to leave, they wanted to keep Hagon. Now Hagon had improved on his Leicester form, but still not the rider Edwards was. Since then Edwards has done brilliantly against Birmingham & made them look even more daft! Maybe his scores are logical, it's easier to get bigger scores riding against Birmingham than for them, due to the strength of the opposition.

Palovaara has a higher average than Cook, so possibly better guest options if he misses any matches.

Heard the same comment before this year, but the RS system continued. Not popular with some on the forum, but I don't hear the clubs themselves arguing against it (unless I've missed that).

Should have said riding at 3 (or not riding at 2). In general Hagon hasn't been good since moving up from reserve, so is put him in the "less pressure" number 2 position.

Can anyone explain why Birmingham preferred to keep Hagon over Edwards?

After thinking on Wednesday, would a good performance from Edwards for Oxford harm Redcar's top four hopes, I'm now thinking the same about Zischke / Vuolas. From a Workington perspective it would be better if Poole won, so if they help Redcar win, hurting Comets top 4 bid!

As a team with 4 "heat leaders" I don't understand Hagon riding at 3?

Agreed, the changes looked to totally transform the team.

It's odd, some riders will drop down & score loads. Maybe at home he will (but that won't be enough for Plymouth to move up the table).

Who would Berwick sign for Cook. No point making a change, unless they new rider is better than guest options. Missing an 8+ number one isn't a bad thing in the Champ. Of course you want a full team, but on paper Berwick should be able to cover till Cook returns.

Makes a real difference to the Workington team if Bowes can keep up the heat leader scoring.