szkocjasid

Good point, personally I'd give Connor Coles a go, who's available under 6.96? Jonas Jeppesen, Matthew Wethers, Thomas Jorgensen, Claus Vissing? Justin Sedgmen 7.35 Remaining 6.95 Paco Castagna 6.92 Kye Thomson 5.53 Jonatan Grahn 5.00 Victor Palovaara 5.00 Connor Coles 3.25

Not that I think this would be a strong team, more a case of riders willing to ride in Britain. Would wait till Palovaara was about to move out of the reserve berth if making these changes though. Edinburgh Justin Sedgmen (7.92) Paco Castagna (7.11) Kye Thomson (6.53) Jonatan Grahn (5.00) Victor Palovaara (5.00) Bastien Borke (4.69) Connor Coles (3.25) Total (39.50) When the averages change could line up like this: 1. Victor Palovaara (8.85) 2. Bastien Borke (4.57) 3. Paco Castagna (6.92) 4. Kye Thomson (5.53) 5. Justin Sedgmen (7.35) 6. Jonatan Grahn (4.00) 7. Connor Coles (3.25)

The advantages of using guests for Dan T is if one doesn't go well, try another the next time. Make a signing & you're stuck with them, unless you make a second change. If they go for a temp replacement, there's been a few impressive newcomers / riders returning to the Champ, Victor Palovaara, Mitchell McDiarmid, Declan Kennedy, I would've added Oskar Polis before he walked out. Also would Francis Gusts be worth a shot?

Not necessarily, could come back & score as of they'd never been away. Can never tell with Speedway riders. Witches still the best looking team imo, but don't look the dominant team they were 2 days ago.

I remember before that, in the mid nineties Paul Hurry, Ben Howe, Scott Nicholls & Savalas Clouting fighting over U21 gold, all top league riders - when the best in the world still competed in Britain. While there are a few strong riders at U21 level, there's not the strength in depth, with NL reserves capable of qualifying now.

Saw this on Ashton Boughen's FB "Not the best of results today but I had to make do with what we had taken as my normal engines are in for service. We try again next weekend for the sgp2 qualifier back on my normal engine" Seems an odd thing to say, why wouldn't you have your best / normal engines available for such an important meeting? What would Boughen's sponsors think or meeting sponsor (if there was one) seeing a rider say "but I had to make do with what we had taken". I realise he's only 17, but doesn't strike me as a professional approach.

I guess technically Sam is a deserving winner, as he won under the rules of the meeting. Not quite sure I agree with your second point as a fair way to do it, everyone meeting once & top scorer wins sounds fair to me? I don't understand the desire to give riders a second chance, or why heat 22 should be more important than heat 1, but I know not everyone will agree.

I know semi finals & finals to finish meetings have gone on for decades now, but I can't understand why having an "exciting final" is preferred to having a "deserving winner" 1st Sam Hagon 15 (7) 2nd Joe Thompson 16 (6) 3rd Luke Harrison 16 (7) Just doesn't sit right to me.

I must admit, I just assumed he must've finished 10th on 6 points. Only once before can I remember 6 points being enough for the top 8.

Big shame, should be an opportunity for less experienced riders to get racing on unfamiliar tracks

As long as Dan is back for the "big matches" Glasgow should be fine. Ipswich will miss him more. Biggest loss is Dan's SGP2 chances. Is there a later qualifying round he could be moved into?

While I agree what Polis did was very wrong & out of order towards the Monarchs. How can you have a punishment for a rider but not a team. Sam Hagon, Bastien Borke & Danyon Hume all dropped after riding a couple of fixtures. If a rider can be let go at the drop of a hat, why can't riders leave clubs giving the same "lack of notice".

If Plymouth have priority & Klindt wants to ride elsewhere, just say he's "withholding his services" Klindt gets a ban & Plymouth get a facility. Klindt probably won't want to miss out on King's Lynn fixtures, so faced with the threat of a ban may ride for Plymouth instead of Poland? What pays better, one meeting in Poland vs 28 days at Lynn & Plymouth?

Bad news for both Jason & Dan, hope they both recover sharpish. Oddly enough the reserve is a bigger loss than the heat leader, while Dan's average is going up, it's going up slowly due to the rolling aves. Ipswich should still easily make the top 4, so no harm done as long as they return before the play-offs. As a neutral makes the league more interesting, not that I'd ever wish bad luck on any team. Get well soon Jason & Dan.

Why did Edinburgh get a 28 day facility for Polis, yet a day later Birmingham get a 14 day facility for MJJ?

Using r/r at one I'd keep the same riding order. Heat 1: Brennan Heat 5/6: King Then if Dan T is going better than Ellis Heat 10/11: Dan T Heat 13: Sayfutdinov If Ellis is going better than Dan T Heat 10/11: Sayfutdinov Heat 13: Ellis Get well soon Jason

Thought it was a bad decision to exclude Lindgren, if they touched it was so minimal. Just encourages riders to lay it down & get a re-run. Lambert was far harder on Bewley in the British final! Should Bewley have laid it down to get Lambert excluded? Get well soon Jason Doyle.

Plymouth have 3 more matches with Klindt on his starting average, after that they could replace Cluff with a heat leader. Cluff will be at reserve for those 3 matches, so could give him a chance to pick up his scoring at number 6?

He was signed on a 6.23 average, so don't know how you can expect 8 points as a minimum? I'd agree it was a disappointing score but sometimes 6+ riders will score 4 points. Wether Poole were lucky or not, they got the win & will be in the play-offs. Edit. I think I misread the post I applied to. Mind you as Kerr was signed on a sub 8.00 average I don't know why you'd expect 8 points minimum. Between 7-9 would be what (from 4) would be what you could expect of him, but obviously hoping for more.

Don't really understand how it can be considered a moral victory? It was the sort of performance that will win the league title (aggregate wins). But a defeat nonetheless. Maybe if someone like Birmingham or Oxford lost by 2 points at Ipswich or Sheffield it could be considered a moral victory?

As a cycle speedway rider I thought it was terrible team riding, obviously riders wearing helmets & racing 500cc engines won't heat shouts from the pits, so I hold Speedway riders to a different standard, but can't understand why Brennan didn't look back at all to see who was behind him? Either to block his opponent or give his partner room.

Yes Palovaara could've ridden for an 8th time had there been a "stupid heat"

Average is too high, can't really see Scunny making a double change.

Plymouth, Edinburgh & Workington could be considered weaker possibly?

Peter Kildemand has a 4.00 average after 6 matches. He'll be at reserve soon.