szkocjasid

I'll suggest Monarchs scoring at least 8 more points than Glasgow at reserve. Is that heavily outscoring, down to personal opinion I guess?

I find Birmingham very difficult to predict, a fair few times last year I predicted decent performances when they had Nicholls guesting or had a strong reserve only for them to be awful. So now even if they look strong, I just expect them to lose.

I think Edinburgh's reserves will heavily outscore Glasgow's, so expecting a home win.

I'm not a fan of the extra 5% rule tbh. It's supposed to help the home team as most riders are better at home, I don't see why that's necessary. Like you say, why have so many complications to the rulebook?

If Oxford thought they were bound to lose, may have been an opportunity to give Heeps, Gilles or Knudsen the guest booking, some track time ahead of the Cheetahs season? But Oxford wouldn't publically admit they had given up on the win.

Bellego was already in their squad, they had 3 senior foreigners for 2 spots in the team.

Is Martin Vaculik still pals with Simon Stead? Could he be tempted to come over, even till the GPs start? As is always in the back of my mind though, get well soon Tai

It's very confusing, because if you read the article, sounds like Ablitt for Muff was a straight swap. But that doesn't fit!

Regarding the RS or weakest reserve not having 3 rides when injured. This isn't a new situation it's happened before, it'll happen again, I think there's been so much said about because Chris Harris has been riding so well. Would we get the same reaction if Kemp replaced Hagon or Vuolas replaced Edwards I think not! Was it not only last year that Dan T was injured & Ipswich used r/r for him meaning they didn't have to use a RS in that match at all? I do feel having 3 rider races because of an injury should be avoided if at all possible.

Actually this stage of the season is when Witches can be complacent, just don't do it in the play-offs lol!

Can only see a big Ipswich win here. Biggest away win so far this season maybe?

I can't see the match score posted on Lynn's FB, I'm curious were they this slow to post the results of their wins over Oxford?

Mind you if they had a true number one, Harris wouldn't be getting 6 or 7 rides a meeting. I guess maybe they won't be strong enough to win when things go against them, but if they can avoid multiple efs should be able to beat anyone bar Ipswich.

I still don't understand how that team finished so low down in the table.

Edinburgh were probably the last team to win the league based on a string top 5 & weak reserves in 2015. So it can be done, but Clegg & Branford were both 3.5 riders (minimum 3.00 aves then) can Glasgow's reserves approach those figures? If they can would put Glasgow as title favourites.

I see William Cairns "only" scored 9+1 (5) at Birmingham today. I guess as he has been so heavily hyped that if he doesn't score a maximum you start to wonder why? Which is a bit harsh for a 15 year old. But when was the last time a 2.00 rider got announced for the following July, you even have many Belle Vue fans saying he'll replace Mulford as RS for the Aces when he's 16. Hopefully he doesn't put too much pressure on himself & maybe ignore fan expectations.

I have to question the use of Chris Harris in heat 15. If Lynn have decided he's one of their top 2 riders, would it not be better for him to take a ride from the 5th best (Cook) to allow the 3rd best (Kvech) an extra race in heat 15? May not have been easy to plan this week with Boughen's injury, they wouldn't want Harris to go out in heats 12,13&14. I guess Harris could've replaced Cook in 10 & left Cook in 13? But that's still 3 on the trot (10,11,12). When was the interval lol!

Naturally my first thoughts are for Tai Woffinden to make a full recovery. While it seems the wrong time to think about replacements the truth is Sheffield will have to do that, they are probably privately thinking about their options. They cannot ride with only 6 riders (unless they use r/r) and cannot delay the start of the season until Tai is in better shape. I'm 99% sure Sheffield will get a 28 day facility. They'll really need to make a change before 1st May as Rowe's rolling ave will then lose it's 25% reduction & the team will be over the limit. Like others I assume a double change, two second strings replacing Tai & Hume may be most likely. Very unfortunate for Danyon, but if he can score well, can put himself in the shop window in case other teams make changes later in the season. Sometimes as fans we are so used to riders making miraculous comebacks from injuries it takes it out of you when they appear more serious. Get well soon Tai.

Why would anyone post a video of the crash, makes me feel sick even thinking about it. If people are really that desperate to see it, could they not wait for official news of Tai's injury before posting?

Really should be a Lynn win. Think Belle Vue's bottom end will struggle against Lynn's strength in depth.

The top part of the Tigers team looks very strong. Only concern should be the reserves, but they may not have to score much for the team to be successful.

Ben Morley (8.32) Kent Vinnie Foord (6.29) Kent Sonny Springer (5.60) Lion Cubs Jacob Clouting (5.04) Oxford Darryl Ritchings (5.01) Oxford Mickie Simpson (4.49) Steelers Cooper Rushen (3.00) King's Lynn Total 37.75

I would normally suggest it's far too early to be thinking about changes, although Oxford dropped Klindt after only 3 matches last season. Mind you, that was to get Riss into the team, who seems to be Schroeck's golden boy. Normally you'd drop a lower averaged rider to strengthen up, but Gusts has started well & there's no chance Schroeck would drop Riss. Who would be willing to come over that would be a stronger rider than one of the top 4.

Comment from Gusts on the match report “There were reasons why we lost today, such as Peter Kildemand being injured. We will learn from it as a team and do better next time.” IRR scored 3,0,2. I don't think they can blame Kildemand's injury for the loss. I honestly think Schroeck & the promoters believe they have a decent team. So it may take a while for them to understand why they lost home & away?

I've never understood this, when promoters, riders or team managers belittle any competition that isn't the league, sometimes they'll even suggest the league isn't that important until you get to the play-offs. Even if they believe that, do they not realise how these comments could affect the crowd? As a fan, I'd want my team to win every competition. Certainly put in the same effort each time, after all fans aren't given a discount because it's "only" the KOC or a challenge match etc & I'm sure riders won't get paid less.