Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,555

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv last won the day on June 4

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv had the most liked content!

About dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  • Birthday 07/24/1971

Previous Fields

  • Marital Status
    Married
  • Age
    46

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ipswich
  • Interests
    Bell ringing, horn blowing Massif member
    Snidey banter on pussycat threads
    Campaigner for fair average assessment and team declaration protocol
  • Team
    Ipswich

Recent Profile Visitors

8,657 profile views

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv's Achievements

Rising Star

Rising Star (9/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

11.2k

Reputation

  1. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    More than slightly frustrating - I'd say completely galling!!
  2. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    The words Birmingham and Full Strength don't really go together though do they...
  3. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    Very true - I misread the table!
  4. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    Already completed 75% of their fixtures so past cut off for changes.....
  5. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    Same applies to all meetings really and not just the TV ones Unfortunately in recent years option 3 has been most popular , closely followed by option 2 with option 1 a distant back marker
  6. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    Those calling for one big league will surely be turning out in their droves as the 6 heat 2nd half is exactly what half a meeting in that type of set up would be if 7 man teams were to be retained........
  7. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    Yes when it is the RS position
  8. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    Then perhaps don't ask/listen to the riders when it comes to track prep in these circumstances....
  9. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    100% agree Perhaps another example of a poorly written regulation as I would presume that it was meant to cover teams eliminated in prior rounds but it doesn't state that After all the plan was for the 2 semis to gave each leg on the same nights which would've prevented this situation I believe the play offs is different and the regulation is written to ensure a rider only turns out for 1 team at any point in the 'mini series'
  10. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    That's a very good point Bash I'm very disappointed in myself for letting that one slip past me!
  11. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    If he had turned earlier surely all that is happening is that Kerr is wiping him out! Could Kerr have pulled out of that move he had committed to?
  12. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    A point worth making about heat 14 last night though is that the reason there was no contact is purely down to self preservation from Dan T Should you have to take a hit from an incoming missile in order to benefit from exclusion decision? Certainly being in one piece is far more important than the result.......
  13. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    That sums up perfectly the prevailing thought process in Speedway at present - how can we manipulate/cheat to get an advantage....
  14. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    I understand the reasoning was that the guest regulation states the rider must have previously achieved an official CMA and that because that was the case despite Lamberts average being considered assessed he was allowed to guest!! Until there is no possibility of a different answer depending on who is asking and when the sham will continue....
  15. dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
    One thing would be guaranteed IF it was Chris Louis involved and that is it would be done correctly.....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy