Joseq7

Including the referee.

I make you right. Perhaps I should have said "very" decent return. As I've mentioned before..... I wonder what his own expectations and motivations are, returning to the saddle after all these years?

I'm happy we have an experienced rider at No.6 I don't think two rookies was the way to go. Back in the day........ well he was just fantastic. Now? Well anything above 5 would be a decent return.

To be fair, we've signed some pish.

IMO I hope not. That's too many rookies.

Never "technically" retired Sir Les.

Complin hasn't set the heather on fire since his return from a 10+ year absence. I did note a 15 point score from 7 rides at home for Plymouth against Poole. I wonder what his own expectations are? If we do sign him then I'd be very happy with +1.5 points on his average.

How would you described is 2022 season? "Meh just kinda average"

Northern? Glasgow is in the Central Belt.

8.76

https://glasgowtigers.co.uk/chris-harris-returns-with-a-point-to-prove/ Fighting talk......

I'm going to give the lad the benefit of the doubt. Welcome back Bomber. The guy is on a career high and there's no reason, today, why that can't continue. Good team building IMO also not to have Basso at 1.

To be honest, off the top of my head, he'd be the only rider that if we ever signed him I wouldn't watch Glasgow whilst he was still in the team.

Now now

I'd never accept him riding for Glasgow. His infantile behaviour at previous derby meetings, riding for them, he'd be beyond the pale for me.

If it is Harris, Basso, Nowak and Complin all in the same team then just take my money! That's entertainment right there.

Oh right. This is still a speedway forum.

What does this even mean?

Harris, Basso, Nowak and Complin! Oooft, it'd be entertaining. Carnage, but entertaining.

I'm not against Harris per se. I'm against us signing a rider on Harris' average, at Harris' age and with Harris' past weekend commitments. For the avoidance of doubt if Lawson and Harris were on the same average I'd want Harris! I'm genuinely not that bothered about my team winning trophies. I pay my money to be entertained and Harris is more entertaining than Lawson. I just think it makes more sense, as the objective of the management is of course to actually win trophies, to sign Lawson over Harris.

Is Vissing? Aye, of course it's true that we don't really know about either yet but you'd think with Vissing and Nowak that's 10 team building points that should be worth 12ish.

This is why I don't think it's Harris. It's an irresponsible usage of too many points. Lawson makes far more sense.

Ace Pijper signs for Glasgow = 2.00

Waited until the cheques cleared.

Was he retired just one season?