Mick Bratley

Well they’ve just sold the Hilton half built Hotel.

I would love it to be council owned and rented to us. The council would never treat us in such a poor way as the landlord's did. And to be fair here, the landlords, The East of England Agricultural Society, probably, well most likely in fact, would have had no idea that the people who they had employed to manage the day to day running of events at the Showground had treated successive club promoters so dreadfully. There is one exception to this and that is the last venue director prior to AEPG arriving on the scene, he was a lot more fairer, worked with the club, not against it and the club was able to operate a little more comfortably. During the Andrew Mercer era of management, I cannot tell you what and absolute rubbish that man was. He absolutely got pleasure out of treating us so bad.

That’s really good to know. Thanks.

Our door has always been open for dialogue. Chairman of the Planning Committee has been seen today on video saying better or equal provision must be made for Speedway.

Just ignore him. Attention seeker.

If Carlsberg made councillors. . . . . She has been 100% with us since day one, we cannot thank her enough for her unwavering support.

Oh yes, just when you think he couldn’t get any lower he does. You wouldn’t have seen it on the livestream but when they came in he turned around in his chair and just stared at me and smirked for the whole of their speeches, he wasn’t looking at them he kept looking in my eyes, he was trying to goad me. Of course I ignored it, but hey we had the last laugh.

There’s a lot of scenarios now how a satisfactory conclusion can be achieved. We are certainly in a better position now than we were 24 hours ago. It is an amazing achievement from a group of seven blokes who got together to fight this one year ago. Supporters should rightly celebrate this moment, let’s face it they haven’t had a lot to celebrate in the last year, but it’s important to understand we have only won a battle not the war.

One quick story. At the World Cup event we held in the early 2000s, we obviously rented the track to stage the event, a sponsor of the event had his banner placed over a banner for the Showground, because they hadn’t sponsored the event. After heat 3 I was called to a crisis at the back of the grandstand, the CEO of the Showground was holding the join of the tv feed (to the world) and said if you don’t take the banner down covering our advert, in five minutes, I’m ending this and everyone can go home. I got a ladder and removed it. Also a lot of people don’t realise that even though we paid rent to run Speedway the Showground wouldn’t allow us to hire in and receive payment for food and drink vendors, they took all of that money themselves. More recently our supporters even had to cut the grass in the car park and spectator areas and do the maintenance on the Grandstand as well, just to operate. They were not good landlords.

You won’t like this, but I’m going to defend Buster. You have to understand how difficult it has been to race speedway for the last 20 years at the Showground. The owners and latterly AEPG have made things so difficult, step out of line and you have the threat of being kicked off, you have to bow down to them. Any disingenuous comments would have seen the club kicked out mid season. I always felt the Showground enjoyed putting pressure on the club, they liked this master/servant approach. So Buster could never say what he really thought, just as I couldn’t when I was promoter there. His hands were somewhat tied.

You all need to forget this ownership issue. There is no ownership because there is no operating club. There is no licence because there is no track. The licence has reverted to the BSPL. Ownership and Licence is irrelevant to the campaign. It is no different to the Coventry situation.

Yes.

Giving this a bump. It actually takes less than a minute to do.

We would be eternally grateful if you could register your support in the quest to preserve Speedway in the City of Peterborough. It will literally take you two minutes. https://tinyurl.com/bdfjn6hr

Just back from what was an entertaining meeting. Got to feel for Ipswich who were on the end of some quite baffling refereeing decisions, certainly no allowances were being made for the pretty poor track conditions, especially early on and yet, Ipswich almost nicked it, they’ve had some terrible luck this season. The crowd motivator Leicester brought in was a new one on me, and I actually think it was a pretty good idea and it actually seemed to work and get the crowd up for it. Good luck to Leicester in the final, but I fear they will have to perform a heck of a lot better than they did in the two semifinal meetings.

They still count/include previous objections, this is just a further opportunity to object.

It’s fortunate I had £10 in my wallet that’s been in it for about three years.

Cracking meeting this, thoroughly enjoyed it. Decent crowd (I think) with many club’s supporters other than those competing in attendance. Met five Panthers fans! The meat pie was excellent. Only gripe from me, cash only for refreshments. Only gripe from my Grandson, no track souvenir shop.

Peterborough is way above the national criteria requiring the number of houses to be built per year currently. It’s all very well building affordable houses but affordable houses are no longer affordable for a high percentage of people who are the target buyers, even in Peterborough which is supposedly cheaper than a lot of parts of the country.

The track could be returned to an ‘as was’ state in five weeks, there are people standing by who would do this. AEPG are not willing to sit round a table with anyone to discuss Peterborough Speedway’s future despite what the Peterborough Local Plan and specifically policies LP30/36 state or the National Planning Policy Framework. I have said all along that this is a watershed moment for Peterborough City Council and its planning department, the outcome of the planning applications will set the direction of travel for the city’s future.

That is sad news. No one, and I mean no one, got by Anne on the gate if they weren’t supposed to. They don’t make ‘em like her anymore. RIP.

Would you have expected them to say anything other than that! The main problem with developing the Showground with 1500 houses is that the road infrastructure isn’t there to support it, the Showground has two entry and exit points, one of which I’m pretty certain they don’t own the land and are currently leasing it. The Showground is surrounded by houses, offices, factories and the A1. 3000+ additional cars will cause carnage to the Ortons and Alwalton. That’s before we discuss doctors, dentists and schools who are all currently over subscribed and under pressure. The Showground should have been developed 15/20 years ago when Southgate and Northgate was built, they’ve missed the development boat, they just don’t realise it yet.

The information we have is that with the ongoing house building in Peterborough and especially Haddon where circa 10k houses are being built puts the city well over the government’s current quota and whatever is likely to be introduced. As for what colour field the Showground is, I don’t know, probably a bit of each. It’s important to note though that it’s absolutely not just the Speedway club objecting to the development, there’s a myriad of other organisations and of course very many local residents, who would be affected for 12 years.

There is no Greens/AEPG alliance as far as I know. Kirsty Knight (Independent ex Greens) does seem to be in AEPGs pocket though.

3500+ local residents who don’t want 12 years of upheaval.