Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Glasgow Tigers 2027


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Bagpuss said:

The Championship being too strong is part of the problem, makes the jump too big for a lot of riders.

The jump has always been pretty big but the dropping of minimum average to 2.00 has seen a lot given places / chances that wouldn't have been if it was 3.00. 

The reality is the gulf between the top at bottom at CL has been to high for a while, 10 point and 2 point riders in the same race is always going to create a big disparity...doesn't mean i know what the solution is though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gmarsbar2 said:

The Championship isn't too strong, it's the Premiership that's got weaker.

It would help young riders develop if the Championship had rising stars.

Yes, I really think they need to dictate a dedicated development place at #7 for each team. I would insist they must get 4 rides too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gmarsbar2 said:

The Championship isn't too strong, it's the Premiership that's got weaker.

It would help young riders develop if the Championship had rising stars.

It's probably a bit of both in reality but the jump from NDL to Champ is too big; as I've said elsewhere doubling up also needs to be brought under control and be a means of bringing on young brits and not topping up the salaries of Masters, Harris, Pickering etc. People find it hard enough to identify with their team and riders without doubling up/down.

As for Championship RS's, absolutely agree.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Noelinho said:

Yes, I really think they need to dictate a dedicated development place at #7 for each team. I would insist they must get 4 rides too.

I would be ok with them getting four rides if it was two in the meeting and two in second half events against the home teams number eight and nine. It is important to down grade the reserve function as there is a wide disparity in abilities which resulted in uneven team strengths in the top tier in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Sings4Speedway said:

Irritates the life out of me the Grmek is available on 3.56. The fact that assessed foreign riders can drop under their assessment figure ridiculous and detrimental to British riders. 

That said why are so many Brits failing to make any real impression in the CL? Foord and Hodder lack some technical basics and blow hot and cold, Perry always gets mentions but rarely delivers. Hagon and Smith have all the backing but miss something to progress.

I question the 2.00 lower limit encourages riders to be signed but with a green light for failure rather than be aspirational it has an approach of anything scored is a bonus.

I would've raised the minimum average of foreigners to 5, rather than lowering it to 3.

I'd also support Brits minimum average returning to 3, now we have situations where having a 2.25 average loses you a team spot to a new 2 pointer.

While I realise that could happen with a 3.25 rider / minimum 3.00 ave rule, feel a 3.25 averaged rider is more likely to get a senior reserve spot than a 2.25 rider ever would.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, flagrag said:

Have a feeling that Seth Norman may be the 2.00 rider that Glasgow will go for has good equipment and already done plenty of laps around Ashfield quite a bit of raw potential with decent equipment and mechanics.

What experience of riding Ashfield? I don't recall him riding in 500cc Youth Championship meetings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/4/2026 at 9:26 PM, Colsimmo58 said:

Leaves 3.92   =  (e,g, SMITH 3.04.FREDRIKSEN 3.48 ,RITCHINGS 3.16, GRMEK 3.56, FOORD 3.24)

Of those 5 , I would take FOORD or SMITH

 

Widely stated that equipment holds Foord back. If Tigers sign him with a sponsored bike/mechanic to sort that then he could increase his average (or prove 'everyone' wrong), especially if the 4 pointer can maintain that average. 

Jack Smith was averaging over 5 in 2024 at reserve for the Tigers (although it dropped after he moved to 2). I'd be happy to see him back at 6. He definitely has some bogey tracks though, so I'd probably take Foord as long as something was done re his equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy