BackInTheDHSS Posted yesterday at 09:21 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:21 AM 1 hour ago, TTT said: 1. S. Masters 8.99 2. S. Hagon 3.71 3. S. Nicholls 7.95 4. L. Killeen 6.03 5. T. Brennan 8.07 6. D. Ritchings 3.17 7. S. Summers 2.00 = 39.92 Yes please! Mainly just to have Nicholls back. Although I reckon I'd rather have Harry Fletcher than Senna Summers. Can see him developing quicker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy The Rebel Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 11 hours ago, TTT said: 1. S. Masters 8.99 2. S. Hagon 3.71 3. S. Nicholls 7.95 4. L. Killeen 6.03 5. T. Brennan 8.07 6. D. Ritchings 3.17 7. S. Summers 2.00 = 39.92 Questionable bottom 3 and having Hagon at a track where you have to turn the bike is a big no no,but that’s a title winning top4 without a doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted 14 hours ago Report Share Posted 14 hours ago 12 hours ago, BackInTheDHSS said: Yes please! Mainly just to have Nicholls back. Although I reckon I'd rather have Harry Fletcher than Senna Summers. Can see him developing quicker. Such a shame!!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted 14 hours ago Report Share Posted 14 hours ago 4 minutes ago, SteveLyric2 said: Such a shame!!? What's a shame? Scott has put he hasn't decided on 2027 yet. 🤷♀️ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 9 hours ago, LisaColette said: What's a shame? Scott has put he hasn't decided on 2027 yet. 🤷♀️ I didn't mention Scotty! It was more about TTT's 1-7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 10 hours ago, SteveLyric2 said: Such a shame!!? I thought the rumours were that the limit was being reduced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago On 10/22/2026 at 6:46 PM, ASpeedwayfan said: The one over 8 rule was a good idea to make the league more balanced, but with there being more riders on 8+ than teams. The rule should be lifted. Let the teams build their sides how they want, not to mention we don’t want riders without jobs because they didn’t manipulate their average Join Leagues They could simply change the 8 point cut-off higher or lower, based on who wants to ride in the Champ in 2027, top 9 riders split amongst the 9 clubs? Of a club opts out & wants to go strength in depth, top 8 riders split amount the other 8 teams? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.