Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Badge said:

Our strength this season has been strong reserves, Danyon and a 3 pointer no thanks. 

With that top 4 you don't need strong reserves. They should get 40 points on their own!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Summers & Covatti fit if two riders do have to be replaced that would still be a very solid side. 

I can't see Holder coming in as he would still want good money and the Witches are built to a specific Budget where Doyley gets the biggest chunk.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Baldyman said:

What's the betting we get whoever the Stars release 

Jorgensen getting the favourites odds on this one although it could be a smokescreen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, lisa-colette said:

With that top 4 you don't need strong reserves. They should get 40 points on their own!

Err..Wolves have quite a strong top 5,and should easily get to 40 points,but having the weakest reserves in the league,it don't always work out like that.Infact that's the mistake Adams made when he built the side.

Edited by Tommy Sweetman
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, lisa-colette said:

With that top 4 you don't need strong reserves. They should get 40 points on their own!

I doubt there has been one meeting this season when our top 4 have got 40 between them 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Baldyman said:

I doubt there has been one meeting this season when our top 4 have got 40 between them 

This time last week.....:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

This time last week.....:D

Yeah but we can't have Tom Brennan every week :lol:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, blue witch said:

A "non negative" result?

Is that different from a "positive" one?

Is it "a possible" rather than "a definite"..?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Louis can have a word with Timi Salonen, the way he was raving about him last night and get Mad Croc Timo Lahti to come with him

Edited by Bash
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Bash said:

Maybe Louis can have a word with Timi Salonen, the way he was raving about him last night and get Mad Croc Timo Lahti to come with him

In blackjack terms we are holding 16

It's time to stick or twist

Stick we will definitely lose , twist and you could draw a 5 and win

So long as its not a squid game and busting means 'elimination' then surely the only choice is to twist

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, mikebv said:

A "non negative" result?

Is that different from a "positive" one?

Is it "a possible" rather than "a definite"..?

Terminology used until confirmed (or not) in laboratory.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Baldyman said:

I doubt there has been one meeting this season when our top 4 have got 40 between them 

I didn't mean the current top 4! But King, Batch and Doyle should be getting 10 each. So should Chris Holder if he came in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy