All Activity

I’d be happy with Jonas and Troy back personally.

It should be a high Points Limit because the CHAMP shouldn't be close to PREM standard like Coleman is saying. Problem is, Northampton's 1-7 very much sounds like -> Musielak, Morris, Lidsey, Thomson, Iversen, McDiarmid and a Rising Star which comes to just under 37.00.

Why is nobody mentioning Jeppesen? Is he not coming back?

GP rider...Wroclaw link...Magic?

Yes but the Champioship won't vote for that as they want their cake and to eat it Less doubling up and/or a change in the multiplier is required There was a plan to move it gradually from 1.5 to 2 but as with so many positive proposals it was soon dropped

Can’t see Klindt (although I’d welcome him) other commitments and obviously the costs required to sign pay him would be high I imagine. Grahn… seems a good rider and enjoys our track ?

Sportowefakty reporting that the deal for Lublin to use Tarnow in '27 and '28 while their own stadium is renovated is far from done. In fact, it could well collapse. Local councillors in Tarnow are unhappy at having to spend up to 6 million zlotys to upgrade their stadium for another team to use it, especially given that Orlen (with their VERY deep pockets) sponsor Lublin.

That's a given.

I actually think Simon Lambert improved quite a bit towards the back end of the season and looked relatively fast so still think there's something there for him

I'm hearing Northampton.

You've pulled some absolute clangers on here, but this one tops the lot. I've always thought you were a 🤡 but that's actually being generous now. 🤦‍♂️

Id have been tempted to set the championship at 36 personally.

If the limit is 37 for 6 on average each team will increase by 2 points ish even with no real improvement from anyone Utter madness continues To start the ratchet of improvement it needs to be at least 40 for the top 6

Seen some riders mentioned there above but unsure on. Edwards - I would take for sure decent rider and change of track may push him on. Juul Pedersen - not for me watched him quiet a few times follow my leader with this guy got very limited passing ability. Lambert - no no backwards step this for sure they guy has been around all the track but the last 2-3 seasons he has been on a backwards step. Cluff - no again wins one race and has about 4-5 lasts very weak rider. Jake Allen - similar rider to Batchelor been around the blocks but very limited in what he scores last resort for me. Couple riders to consider - Klindt - obviously a name on everyone’s lips but will cost a lot and Saturday at 7pm will not suit. Wood - I would take a punt on Dayle Wood progressed at reserve at Oxford and a decent gater. Mulford - again decent number 2 or if the team built correctly could be a very strong reserve.

Absolutely. The Championship is too strong in terms of top riders. None of those riders at Number 1 and 5 should be able to ride if they're already Premiership heatleaders. Turkeys and Christmas though.

Most of the prospective teams being cited on here look hardly any different to last season's starting seven - and they won't, not with the same points limit. All you can hope for is that most riders live up to their average and one or two increase theirs.

agreed its ridiculous that the championship has got even stronger by the looks of it, yet certain teams are scared to step up for some absurd reason. It also leads to bigger mismatches between the championships number 1 & 5 and the 6 & 7s.

He does, but looks like nobody has listened to him shock horror. If anything, it looks like the leagues have got CLOSER 🙄

What you say makes very reasonable sense and is practical and logical. Therefore by definition an insurance company lawyer would go no where near that. They just want a certified date to cover their backsides so if there's a failure it's not their fault.

Can’t see it being anything other than 37. The proposed Northampton team has been built to 37 and hasn’t even quite managed that.

While I completely agree that there should be a wider gap I worry if all clubs will be able to afford to build teams up to very high averages. Could lead to a very uncompetitive league?

While I completely agree that there should be a wider gap I worry if all clubs will be able to afford to build teams up to very high averages. Could lead to a very uncompetitive league?

looking like the champ are building to 40 points, coleman wants a bigger gap between leagues so i very much doubt it will be 37 points for 6 riders, i really hope its 42 for 6 riders

dont think morris is at leicester

Josh Pickering 10.64 Edward Kennet 4.62 Michael Palm Toft 6.05 Connor Mountain 5.25 Tate Zischke 6.54 Vinnie Foord 3.30 Ryan Ingram 3.55 39.95